{"id":226285,"date":"2020-02-27T13:26:21","date_gmt":"2020-02-27T07:56:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=226285"},"modified":"2020-07-03T15:17:23","modified_gmt":"2020-07-03T09:47:23","slug":"tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/","title":{"rendered":"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties"},"content":{"rendered":"

Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): <\/strong>Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) rejected the review application stating that the proceeding held and orders passed are on the basis of audit and other relevant materials for which sufficient opportunity was given to the parties.<\/p>\n

In the present application, the respondents were represented by counsel Kunal Tandon, Shashank Shekhar and Amandeep Singh.<\/p>\n

The main contention raised on behalf of the applicant by the counsel A.K. Parsaniya, AR is that the payments required to be made by the petitioner on the basis of order dated 24.1.2020 should be indicated as payments \u201con account\u201d subject to any errors in the claim raised by the non-applicant and subject to outcome of a comprehensive audit by BECIL as ordered by this Tribunal itself in the order under review dated 24.1.2020.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal observed the contentions to be meritless because the applicant\/petitioner has already been subjected to audit which noted substantial non-compliance with Regulations. The applicant was under the wrong impression that audits are subject to further audit by BECIL as per orders of TDSAT. The BECIL audit as per TDSAT, has a definite purpose of finding out the exact period since when the petitioner\u2019s system can be treated to be totally compliant with the Regulations and, therefore, its reports may safely be relied upon for the purpose of raising invoices by the broadcasters. The Tribunal further observed that the method of calculating the dues on estimation is not to be relied on indefinitely.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal also assured that if the BECIL audit report reveals some new facts that can have a favorable impact on the petitioners, they are free to move the Tribunal.<\/p>\n

The Tribunal stated that the proceeding held and orders passed are on the basis of audit already held and is not be associated with the BECIL\u2019s audit and other relevant materials for which sufficient opportunity was given to the parties. The Tribunal refused to review only on the ground that there may be some errors in the accounts as they are always subject to reconciliation and can be a subject matter of the appropriate petition.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the Review Application is rejected.[Multireach Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Zee Entertainment Enterprise Ltd, 2020 SCC OnLine TDSAT 126<\/a>, <\/b>decided on 24-02-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) rejected the review application stating that the proceeding held and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":31441,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[22394,39783],"class_list":["post-226285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-review-application","tag-sufficient-opportunity"],"yoast_head":"\nTDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) rejected the review application stating that the proceeding held and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-27T07:56:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-03T09:47:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/\",\"name\":\"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-27T07:56:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-03T09:47:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties","og_description":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) rejected the review application stating that the proceeding held and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-27T07:56:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-03T09:47:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/","name":"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","datePublished":"2020-02-27T07:56:21+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-03T09:47:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/27\/tdsat-review-application-cannot-be-accepted-only-on-the-ground-that-there-may-be-some-errors-in-accounts-when-sufficient-opportunity-already-been-given-to-parties\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TDSAT | Review application cannot be accepted only on the ground that there may be some errors in accounts when sufficient opportunity already been given to parties"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":221817,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/tdsat-super-channels-directed-to-pay-the-amount-due-for-supply-of-signals-to-sony-pictures\/","url_meta":{"origin":226285,"position":0},"title":"TDSAT | Super Channels directed to pay the amount due for supply of signals to Sony Pictures","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 6, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh (Chairperson) while allowing the petition directed the respondent to pay the decretal amount within six weeks of the order failing which the petitioner will be entitled to realize the amount through execution application. Petitioner, Sony Pictures Network India Pvt.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214320,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/04\/tdsat-disconnection-notices-upheld-against-reliance-communications-in-case-of-wrongful-routing-of-calls\/","url_meta":{"origin":226285,"position":1},"title":"TDSAT | Disconnection notices upheld against Reliance Communications in case of wrongful routing of calls","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 4, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): This matter was brought before Justice S.K. Singh (Chairperson) and A.K. Bhargava (Member). Facts of the case were such that an Interconnect Agreement was entered between the parties. This dispute occurred due to the bill raised by respondent alleging petitioner that it had\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/28\/tdsat-migration-of-cellular-mobile-telephone-service-license-to-unified-license-of-aircel-ltd-held-should-not-be-rejected-on-grounds-of-misrepresentation-of-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":226285,"position":2},"title":"TDSAT | Migration of Cellular Mobile Telephone Service license to Unified License of Aircel Ltd; held, should not be rejected on grounds of misrepresentation of authority","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 28, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal: Justice S.K Singh (Chairperson), while hearing a petition regarding the dispute relating to the procedures to be followed by the telecom companies for obtaining the Unified License (UL), ordered in the favour of the petitioner, Aircel Ltd. The issue in the present case arose\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245698,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/17\/tdsat\/","url_meta":{"origin":226285,"position":3},"title":"TDSAT | A dispute between two service providers may be maintainable even in absence of a subsisting agreement; Totality of facts to be considered","author":"Editor","date":"March 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. Facts The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is a Multi-System Operator i.e. MSO and Respondent 1 is a Local Cable Operator i.e. LCO in Andhra Pradesh within the area\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":237347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/12\/del-hc-why-was-broadcast-audience-research-council-of-indias-new-algorithm-to-mitigate-the-impact-of-landing-page-on-viewership-data-across-television-channels-challenged\/","url_meta":{"origin":226285,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Why was Broadcast Audience Research Council of India\u2019s new algorithm to mitigate impact of \u2018Landing Page\u2019 on viewership data across television channels challenged? HC\u2019s analysis","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Navin Chawla, J., refused to pass an interim injunction in regard to the communication dated 03-09-2020 along with Press Release dated 03-09-2020 and Frequently Asked Questions issued by the respondent, BARC. Jurisdiction to adjudicate the present dispute The basis of the present petition was that the disputes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":222357,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/21\/tdsat-trai-cannot-frame-regulations-with-retrospective-effect-in-the-absence-of-any-provision-to-that-effect-in-trai-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":226285,"position":5},"title":"TDSAT | TRAI cannot frame Regulations with retrospective effect in the absence of any provision to that effect in TRAI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT): Justice Shiva Kirti Singh, (Chairperson) while not granting any interim relief to the petitioners upholds that the amendment Regulations 2018 cannot have retrospective operation. The two respondents, Tata Communications Ltd. and Bharati Airtel Ltd., are owners of facilities called Cable Landing Operations. For\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/TDSAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226285\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}