{"id":226223,"date":"2020-02-26T14:30:14","date_gmt":"2020-02-26T09:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=226223"},"modified":"2020-03-12T19:59:07","modified_gmt":"2020-03-12T14:29:07","slug":"pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Patna High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J, disposed the petition directing the respondents to pay the simple interest at the rate 9% per annum as provided under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for three years delay in the amount being paid to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The facts of the case are that a person whose land has been taken in the year 2011, receives the full compensation only in the year 2020, wherein the additional demand of Rs 19,30,03,159 was raised before the respondents on 12-09-2015. However, the said amount was sanctioned by the Ministry of Home Affairs on 09-08-2018 and thereafter sent on 16-08-2018. There was no justification for the non-release of funds for a full three years.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court observed that the part of the delay can be understood in a way that a new Act came into force and thereafter things were re-worked. However, once the amount was quantified and demands rose by the District authorities on 12-09-2015, thereafter, the late sanctioning and sending the money after three years cannot be said to be bona fide<em>.<\/em> The Court, thus, opined that the petitioner is entitled to simple interest at 9% per annum, as has been provided in the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 itself, for three years delay in the amount being paid to the petitioner. [Surendra Das v. State of Bihar,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/514SPD4h\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Pat 268<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-01-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court:\u00a0Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J, disposed the petition directing the respondents to pay the simple interest at the rate 9% per annum <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2728,39761],"class_list":["post-226223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compensation","tag-right-to-fair-compensation-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court:\u00a0Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J, disposed the petition directing the respondents to pay the simple interest at the rate 9% per annum\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-26T09:00:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-03-12T14:29:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-26T09:00:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-03-12T14:29:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted","og_description":"Patna High Court:\u00a0Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J, disposed the petition directing the respondents to pay the simple interest at the rate 9% per annum","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-26T09:00:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-03-12T14:29:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/","name":"Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-02-26T09:00:14+00:00","dateModified":"2020-03-12T14:29:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/26\/pat-hc-delay-of-3-years-in-making-payment-under-right-to-fair-compensation-act-found-not-bona-fide-amount-at-the-rate-of-9-simple-interest-granted\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Delay of 3 years in making payment under Right to Fair Compensation Act found not bona fide; amount at the rate of 9% simple interest granted"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/12\/determination-of-rightful-compensation-entitlement-requires-proper-adjudication-under-section-64-of-right-to-fair-compensation-actmp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":226223,"position":0},"title":"Land Acquisition| Rightful Compensation claim requires proper adjudication under Section 64 of Right to Fair Compensation Act: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"If a person is of the view that the compensation has been paid to a wrong person, then the same can be a ground for making reference under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act, 2013.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305878,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/28\/land-acquisition-compensation-rate-supreme-court-reduces-15-percent-annual-increase-to-8-percent\/","url_meta":{"origin":226223,"position":1},"title":"Land Acquisition Compensation Rate | \u201811 years gap pretty large\u2019: Supreme Court reduces 15% annual increase to 8%","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court considered what would be fair and just compensation to do justice between the parties so that landowners get a fair and reasonable compensation for losing their land.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Land Acquisition Compensation Rate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Land-Acquisition-Compensation-Rate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Land-Acquisition-Compensation-Rate.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Land-Acquisition-Compensation-Rate.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Land-Acquisition-Compensation-Rate.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309803,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/despite-substantial-delay-right-to-property-under-article-300a-supports-compensation-claim-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":226223,"position":2},"title":"Right to property| Calcutta High Court directs payment of compensation under Article 300A despite substantial delay","author":"Ritu","date":"December 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the Municipality's possession without proper acquisition procedures is deemed illegal, and the State is directed to initiate proceedings and pay compensation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313110,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/05\/cal-hc-grants-compensation-under-right-to-fair-compensation-and-transparency-in-land-acquisition-act-2013-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":226223,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court grants compensation after lapse of proceedings and utilisation of land for Flyover Construction","author":"Ritu","date":"February 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the previous judgments and record of rights post-vesting supports petitioners\u2019 claim for compensation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":137711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/20\/trial-court-can-review-its-own-order-under-the-land-acquisition-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":226223,"position":4},"title":"Trial court can review its own order under the Land Acquisition Act","author":"Saba","date":"June 20, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench of the Court comprising Shalini Phansalkar Joshi, J. held that a trial court can review its own award to bring it in tune with the amended provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984. The petitioners had stated that the trial court has no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":302686,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/30\/enhancement-of-compensation-in-motor-accident-claims-case-due-to-wrong-multiplier-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":226223,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court enhances compensation in motor accident claims case","author":"Ritu","date":"September 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court deleted the name of one of the claimants who had passed away, and condoned the delay in filing the appeal.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}