{"id":226094,"date":"2020-02-24T09:45:19","date_gmt":"2020-02-24T04:15:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=226094"},"modified":"2020-02-25T16:50:50","modified_gmt":"2020-02-25T11:20:50","slug":"jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/","title":{"rendered":"J&#038;K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court:<\/strong> Sanjeev Kumar, J., closed a contempt petition seeking to initiate proceedings against respondents for non-compliance with the orders of the Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present petition has been filed seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for willful disobedience and non-compliance. The previous Bench had stated that the petitioner had chosen the wrong forum to adjudicate the matter and directed that due <em>\u201c\u2026to the nature of controversy the writ petition was taken up for final disposal at its threshold and is disposed of by providing that writ petitioner shall approach the concerned authority with a representation which shall be considered and decided by the said Authority within a period of one month\u201d <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>\u00a0<\/em>The Senior Additional Advocate General representing the respondent, N. H. Shah had filed a response to the contempt petition and took the stand that the representation filed by the petitioner had been considered and the petitioner had not been found entitled to any compensation on the ground that house damaged is a non-residential house which is not covered by the policy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The advocate representing the petitioner, G. Murtaza Dar, contended that the issue of whether the compensation is payable for the non-residential house had already been decided in affirmative by the Division Bench of the present court and since the respondents had not abided by the stated order of the Division Bench, they are in contempt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court upon perusal of the facts and records stated that respondents had fully complied with the order of the Division Bench. The Court also observed the view of the Division Bench and stated that the writ court had not given any finding with regard to the entitlement of compensation to the petitioner and had categorically stated that the petitioner had chosen a wrong forum for adjudication. [Farooq Ahmad Bhat v. Syed Abid Rashid Shah, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/ru6eckAM\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine J&amp;K 122<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-02-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J., closed a contempt petition seeking to initiate proceedings against respondents for non-compliance with the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2728,13891,39716],"class_list":["post-226094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compensation","tag-contempt-proceedings","tag-non-compliance-with-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>J&amp;K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&amp;K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J., closed a contempt petition seeking to initiate proceedings against respondents for non-compliance with the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-24T04:15:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-25T11:20:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-24T04:15:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-25T11:20:50+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&#038;K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0","og_description":"Jammu &amp; Kashmir High Court: Sanjeev Kumar, J., closed a contempt petition seeking to initiate proceedings against respondents for non-compliance with the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-24T04:15:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-25T11:20:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/","name":"J&K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-02-24T04:15:19+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-25T11:20:50+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/jk-hc-court-dismisses-application-for-contempt-proceedings-against-respondent-due-to-inappropriate-forum\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&#038;K HC | Court dismisses application for contempt proceedings against respondent due to inappropriate forum\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":211662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/jk-hc-stay-application-rejected-considering-that-applicant-already-filed-independent-motion-in-contempt-petition-for-deferment-of-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":226094,"position":0},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Stay application rejected considering that applicant already filed independent motion in contempt petition for deferment of\u00a0 proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Tashi Rabstan, J., dismissed the application filed for seeking stay of contempt proceedings pending in the contempt petition on the ground that the applicants\/respondents had already filed a review petition for review of judgment\/order, implementation of which was sought by the writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":318826,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/30\/rajasthan-high-court-directs-to-establish-separate-cells-to-ensure-court-order-compliance-in-contempt-of-court-case-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":226094,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan High Court directs State to establish \u2018separate cells\u2019 to ensure timely compliance of court order","author":"Ritu","date":"March 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDisobedience of the Court orders strikes at the very root of the Rule of Law and the judicial orders are bound to be obeyed at all costs.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":242479,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/20\/sc-wilful-disobedience-or-wilful-breach-are-these-necessary-requisites-for-bringing-in-action-for-civil-contempt-read-on\/","url_meta":{"origin":226094,"position":2},"title":"SC | Wilful disobedience or Wilful breach: Are these necessary requisites for bringing in action for &#8216;Civil Contempt&#8217;? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 20, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: B.R. Gavai, J., while addressing a contempt petition expressed that: \u201c\u2026contempt proceeding is not like an execution proceeding under the Code of Civil Procedure.\u201d \u201c\u2026contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature and the standard of proof required is in the same manner as in the other criminal cases.\u201d \u201cA\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344006,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/20\/no-fresh-cause-of-action-continuing-non-compliance-consent-decree-delhi-hc-dismisses-contempt-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":226094,"position":3},"title":"No fresh cause of action arises from continuing non-compliance with consent decree; Delhi High Court dismisses contempt petition being time-barred","author":"Arunima","date":"March 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The cause of action to file the present petition arose when respondent 1 failed to pay the balance amount to the petitioner by 31-12-2012 as per clause (vi) of the compromise agreement based on which the consent decree dated 01-06-2009 was passed.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279665,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/madras-high-court-dismisses-contempt-proceedings-against-presiding-officer-of-family-court-imposes-rs-50000-costs-on-the-petitioner-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":226094,"position":4},"title":"Madras High Court dismisses contempt proceedings against presiding officer of family Court; Imposes Rs. 50,000 costs on the petitioner","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court held that the contempt petition is not maintainable and barred by limitation. Thus, dismissed contempt proceedings against the presiding officer of Family Court as he was not the presiding officer when the order was passed.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Madras-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":233261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/01\/madras-hc-schools-violating-court-order-of-40-only-fees-collection-shall-be-subject-to-contempt-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":226094,"position":5},"title":"Madras HC | Schools violating Court Order of 40% only fees collection shall be subject to Contempt Proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 1, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Anand Venkatesh, J., stated that in case the Schools are violating the High Court's earlier Order with regard to collection of only 40% tuition fees by unaided private institutions during the academic year 2019-2020, Contempt proceedings shall be instituted. Petition was filed seeking writ of mandamus directing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=226094"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/226094\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=226094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=226094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=226094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}