{"id":225946,"date":"2020-02-20T15:00:42","date_gmt":"2020-02-20T09:30:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=225946"},"modified":"2020-02-24T17:58:19","modified_gmt":"2020-02-24T12:28:19","slug":"raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>Arun Bhansali J., quashed and set aside the order of the trial court since the trial court erred in rejecting the petition seeking to implead them as a party to the suit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The present writ petition was filed by the petitioners being aggrieved against the order passed by the Civil Judge. The respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit for declaration of easementary rights and permanent injunction in relation to the right of way and sought permanent injunction by impleading the State as well as the Tehsildar as party defendants to the suit. They had filed an application with the submission that the land in question was a cremation ground and various mausoleums of their ancestors were situated therein and thus they are seeking to be impleaded as party defendants to the suit. The Trial Court after hearing the parties came to the conclusion that the land in question belongs to the State and therefore there were no necessity of applicants being impleaded as party defendants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The advocate representing the petitioner, Teja Ram submitted that the trial court was not justified in rejecting the application filed by the petitioners, inasmuch as admittedly the land in question was Gair Mumkin Samshan and was being used by the petitioners as the cremation ground.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The advocate representing the respondents, Roshan Lal contended that the trial court was justified in rejecting the application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court upon perusal of the materials available on record stated that the trial court was not justified in rejecting the application on the ground that the land did not belong to the petitioner since the residents of the area had an interest in that land. The Court opined that the trial court should have taken a comprehensive view of the matter and observed that <em>\u201c\u2026the suit was being contested on part of the defendants also was an indicator towards the nature of interest being taken by the State in defending the suit and, therefore, the rejection of application was not justified.\u201d <\/em>[Hansa Ram v. Moda, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/vSkPOv76\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Raj 276<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-02-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali J., quashed and set aside the order of the trial court since the trial court erred in <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[39684,14201,7181],"class_list":["post-225946","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-easementary-rights","tag-permanent-injunction","tag-trial-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali J., quashed and set aside the order of the trial court since the trial court erred in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-20T09:30:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-24T12:28:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-20T09:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-24T12:28:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":358,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Easementary Rights\",\"permanent injunction\",\"Trial Court\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-20T09:30:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-24T12:28:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/20\\\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali J., quashed and set aside the order of the trial court since the trial court erred in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-20T09:30:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-24T12:28:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition","datePublished":"2020-02-20T09:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-24T12:28:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/"},"wordCount":358,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Easementary Rights","permanent injunction","Trial Court"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/","name":"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-02-20T09:30:42+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-24T12:28:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/20\/raj-hc-court-allows-impleadment-of-petitioner-quashes-trial-court-order-of-rejection-of-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Court allows impleadment of petitioner; quashes trial court order of rejection of petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":218666,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/mp-hc-plaint-filed-under-or-7-r-11-cpc-can-be-rejected-based-on-grounds-mentioned-in-rule-11-or-if-the-cause-of-action-has-not-been-disclosed\/","url_meta":{"origin":225946,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | Plaint filed under Or. 7 R. 11 CPC can be rejected based on grounds mentioned in Rule 11 or if the cause of action has not been disclosed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Prakash Shrivastava, J., dismissed the revision petition filed by the respondents under Section 115 CPC where they challenged the order of the Trial Court, whereby their application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was rejected. The respondents had filed the suit for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/08\/grant-of-injunction\/","url_meta":{"origin":225946,"position":1},"title":"Megh HC | Grant of injunction cannot be claimed by a party as a matter of right nor can it be denied by the Court arbitrarily; Court dismisses petition on the question of effective possession","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H. S. Thangkhiew, J., dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court by way of this application under Order 6 of Meghalaya (Jurisdiction over District Council Courts) Order, 2014. The appellant claimed that he was running a hostel in a building\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207231,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":225946,"position":2},"title":"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the petition which challenged the order of the trial court whereunder the application of the plaintiffs filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to implead the wife of Defendant 1 was rejected. The facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":207724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/07\/plea-for-additional-pleas-rejected-as-nothing-new-was-pleaded-in-written-statement\/","url_meta":{"origin":225946,"position":3},"title":"J&#038;K HC | Petition for additional pleas rejected as nothing new pleaded in written statement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 7, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: A Bench of Sanjeev Kumar, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of a Subordinate Civil Judge where the application of the petitioner seeking leave of the court to file additional pleas (replica) was cancelled. The facts of the case are that a suit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215262,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/01\/utt-hc-ex-parte-interim-injunction-satisfaction-for-prima-facie-case-balance-of-convenience-and-irreparable-loss-must-be-recorded-before-grant-thereof\/","url_meta":{"origin":225946,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | Ex-parte interim injunction: Satisfaction for prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss must be recorded before grant thereof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J. allowed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution for quashing the order passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division) while granting an ex-parte injunction in the favour of respondents and the order passed by IV Additional Sessions Judge while rejecting\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":200608,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/24\/suit-not-maintainable-as-matter-to-go-through-arbitration-by-virtue-of-section-8-of-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996\/","url_meta":{"origin":225946,"position":5},"title":"Suit not maintainable as matter to go through arbitration by virtue of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Amit Rawal, J., allowed a revision petition which was filed against the order whereby an application submitted under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for resolution of dispute was dismissed by the Trial Court. The facts\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225946","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225946"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225946\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}