{"id":225904,"date":"2020-02-19T14:48:44","date_gmt":"2020-02-19T09:18:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=225904"},"modified":"2020-02-24T17:56:03","modified_gmt":"2020-02-24T12:26:03","slug":"bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Bombay High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog, CJ and Bharati Dangre, J. while allowing the present appeals with regard to failure in showing sufficient cause to seeking review with a delay of 2680 days, stated that,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u201cIt needs no rocket science for anyone to infer that probably the respondent got a premonition that it might lose.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Facts pertinent to the issue<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An agreement was entered between the appellants and respondent, wherein the respondent was to supply bunker fuel to the appellant\u2019s vessel M.T. Antikeros at Mudra Port.\u00a0 After the respondent supplied the same, 12 days later a dispute arose between the parties regarding the quantity and quality of the fuel. After about a month, the appellant claimed for damages. Respondent denied the liability and raised a counter-claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant on 19-03-2009, invoked the arbitration clause, with a view to save arbitration costs, proposed a sole arbitrator. Appellant appointed R.S. Cooper as its arbitrator and called upon the respondent to do likewise. Respondent failed to respond to appoint an Arbitrator. Later Single Judge of the Bombay High Court pursuant to an application filed by the appellant for appointment of an arbitrator on behalf of respondent disposed of the same by appointing J.K. Bhatt as an Arbitrator on 21-04-2011.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The above-stated arbitrator\u2019s appointed T.V. Shanbhag as the Presiding Arbitrator.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On 19-09-2013, Arbitral Tribunal settled the issues which arose for determination.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Respondents challenged the Jurisdiction of the tribunal. Later on 03-08-2018, respondents while filing an application seeking to recall the order passed by the tribunal on 03-07-2013, as also the order dated 19-09-2013, by which order issues were settled.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Though, the tribunal rejected the above application. Further, the respondents challenged the order passed by Single Judge of the Bombay High Court regarding the appointment of J.K. Bhatt as an Arbitrator.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On 30-8-2018 the respondent filed a petition seeking review of the order dated 21-04-2011 passed by this Court. It also sought 7 years delay in filing the Review Application to be condoned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On 22-03-2018, the impugned order was passed condoning delay of 7 years in seeking review of the order dated 21-04-2011 and simultaneously recalling the said order of appointment of J.K. Bhatt as an Arbitrator on behalf of the respondent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u201cTorpedo shot by the respondent on 30-08-2018 hit its target. The Arbitral Tribunal came to be hit, in that, its constitution was blasted by the torpedo fired by the respondent.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On noting the stated facts, Single Judge noted that the subject matter of the application being an international commercial arbitration the appropriate fora was the Supreme Court of India and thus, the order dated 21-04-2011 was a nullity and is <em>non-est.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Where a Court acts under an appealable provision of law and passes an order, a party is not deprived of the right of appeal, though on the facts the order should not have been passed under that provision<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>High Court noted<\/strong> that the impugned order being passed in exercise of the review jurisdiction by the Single Judge both the appeals are maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Court observed<\/strong> <strong>that<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">prior to the amendment of the Act by the Arbitration &amp; Conciliation (Amendment) Act 2015 brought into force with effect from 01-01-2016 when in sub-section 4, 5 &amp; 6 of Section 11 of the Act the words <em>\u2018the Chief Justice or any person or institution designated by him\u2019 <\/em>wherever they occur were replaced by the words<em> \u2018the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High Court or any person or institution designated by such Court\u2019, <\/em>the position was that under the Act the procedure for appointment in case of sub-section 3 being applicable was to file an application before the Chief Justice of a High Court or any person or institution designated by him, in a case of domestic arbitration and before the Chief Justice of India or any person or institution designated by him in International Commercial Arbitration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Section 11 of the Arbitration Act was a Judicial Power was held in 7-Judge Bench decision of the Supreme Court <em>S.B.P. &amp; Co. v. Patel Engineering Ltd<\/em>., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/oxIlsYSp\">(2005) 8 SCC 618<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, on perusal of the above-stated analysis and facts, Bench held that Single Judge had no jurisdiction to entertain the petition seeking review of the order dated 21-04-2011.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Further, Court stated that, the impugned order is vitiated when it proceeds to condone the delay by not considering whether the sufficient cause was shown to condone the delay of 2680 days in seeking review of the above-stated order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cWhilst it may be true that an order passed in a lis or an issue which cannot be taken cognizance of by a Court or an authority is void and non-est, but that does not mean that a party can sleep over its rights and participate in further proceedings and one fine day approach the Court or the authority to rectify the error.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, respondents failed to show sufficient cause entitling it to 2680 days delay in seeking review of the order dated 21-04-2011 to be condoned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>The torpedo fired by the respondent is declared to be a dude and it sinks without hitting its target.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant would be entitled to costs incurred before the Single Judge as also in the instant appeals which bench quantified at Rs 5 lakhs. [Antikeros Shipping Corpn. v. \u00a0Adani Enterprises Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/050g2Pvh\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Bom 277<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-02-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog, CJ and Bharati Dangre, J. while allowing the present appeals with regard to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[39667,3226,27604,3755,39668],"class_list":["post-225904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adani-enterprises","tag-arbitration","tag-counter-claim","tag-damages","tag-single-judge-order"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog, CJ and Bharati Dangre, J. while allowing the present appeals with regard to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-19T09:18:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-24T12:26:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-19T09:18:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-24T12:26:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise","og_description":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of Pradeep Nandrajog, CJ and Bharati Dangre, J. while allowing the present appeals with regard to","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-19T09:18:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-24T12:26:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/","name":"Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2020-02-19T09:18:44+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-24T12:26:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/bom-hc-a-party-seeking-rectification-cannot-sleep-over-its-rights-rs-5-lakhs-costs-imposed-on-adani-enterprise\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | A party seeking rectification cannot sleep over its rights; Rs 5 lakhs costs imposed on Adani Enterprise"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":294853,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/17\/allahabad-hc-refuses-quash-fir-against-congress-leader-over-modi-adani-love-affair-remark\/","url_meta":{"origin":225904,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court refuses to quash FIR against Youth Congress leader over his \u2018love affair\u2019 remark against Modi and Adani","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court opined that the offence alleged in the impugned FIR would definitely fall within the ambit of Section 153-A and Section 505(2) of IPC which are cognizable offences. Thus, refused to quash the FIR against Secretary of UP Youth Congress, Sachin Chaudhary","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290359,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/22\/adani-power-entitled-to-change-in-law-for-100-of-contracted-capacity-which-is-70-of-installed-capacity-of-the-phase-iv-extension-of-mundra-project-supreme-court-legal-resear\/","url_meta":{"origin":225904,"position":1},"title":"Adani power entitled to Change in Law for 100% of contracted capacity which is 70% of installed capacity of Phase IV extension of Mundra Project: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court opined that it is unjust on the part of Haryana Utilities to say that 70% of the installed capacity should be further bifurcated and the Change in Law benefit should be restricted only to 70% of the installed capacity.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"adani power","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/adani-power.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/adani-power.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/adani-power.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/adani-power.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343261,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/08\/bomhc-permits-adani-cementation-to-cut-158-mangroves-trees-for-jetty-construction\/","url_meta":{"origin":225904,"position":2},"title":"Bombay HC permits Adani Cementation Ltd. to cut 158 mangroves trees for jetty construction to transport cement","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Ensure that any activity though aimed at as a commercial activity, does not deplete the available natural resources and even if it does so, in any minimized way, its loss shall be compensated.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/22\/delhi-high-court-dismiss-petition-seeking-probe-over-invoicing-adani-essar-group-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":225904,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses plea by Centre for PIL and Harsh Mander seeking probe into alleged over invoicing by Essar Group, Adani Group among others","author":"Arunima","date":"December 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitions are premised upon a show cause notice issued by DRI promulgating that the intelligence has indicated that various entities of Adani Group and Essar Group were indulging in gross over-valuation of imported goods (zero or low duty rated) to siphon off money abroad from Public Listed Companies.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/explained-why-supreme-court-dismissed-appeal-filed-by-msedcl-and-passed-an-order-in-favour-of-adani-power-legal-news-legal-research-updates-change-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":225904,"position":4},"title":"Explained| Why Supreme Court dismissed MSEDCL&#8217;s appeal against compensation to Adani Power and GMR Warora Energy due to \u2018Change in Law\u2019?","author":"Editor","date":"March 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court upheld the judgement passed by the APTEL after observing that the generating companies were entitled to compensation so as to restore them to the same economic position, if the Change in Law had not occurred.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Adani","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-699.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-699.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-699.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-699.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279853,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/17\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reiterates-that-principle-that-governs-compensating-a-party-for-the-time-value-for-money-would-be-applied-for-grant-of-interest-on-carrying\/","url_meta":{"origin":225904,"position":5},"title":"Principle that governs compensating a party for the time value for money would be applied for grant of interest on carrying cost on account of a change in law event; Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"December 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The interest in \u2018carrying cost' is nothing but time value for money and the only way a party can be afforded the benefit of restitution in every which way.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-511.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225904\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}