{"id":225897,"date":"2020-02-19T11:19:37","date_gmt":"2020-02-19T05:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=225897"},"modified":"2020-03-05T09:36:52","modified_gmt":"2020-03-05T04:06:52","slug":"forged-order-made-in-name-of-justice-g-s-patel-of-bombay-hc-entire-document-is-not-only-a-forgery-but-a-clumsy-one","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/19\/forged-order-made-in-name-of-justice-g-s-patel-of-bombay-hc-entire-document-is-not-only-a-forgery-but-a-clumsy-one\/","title":{"rendered":"Breaking | Forged Order made in name of Justice G.S. Patel of Bombay HC | “Entire document is not only a forgery but a clumsy one”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court: <\/strong>G.S. Patel, J., on 15-02-2020 noted a complaint filed by two Advocates \u2013 Umesh Vasant Mohite and Hetal Arvind Pandya wherein it was stated by the Advocates that,<\/p>\n

An order has been passed by in the name of Justice G.S. Patel on 01-12-2019.<\/p>\n

G.S. Patel Justice in the above regard states that,<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe entire document is a forgery and there is no such order. Several reasons for this One, the document purports to be an order in the High Court\u2019s Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction \u2018In Its Revenue and Property Division\u2019. There is no such Division. It purports to be in a Commercial Succession Petition (L) No. 23520 of 2019. There is no such proceeding and there could be no such proceeding as a \u201cCommercial Succession Petition\u201d. There is no Testamentary Petition with a five-digit lodging number.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cEntire formatting of the documents, including the fonts, line spacing, etc, is not in the manner in which I make my orders. There is no footer of the date and page number which is my invariable practice for the last several years.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Further, he adds,<\/p>\n

\u201cDocument purports to be made on 01-12-2019. That was a Sunday. No such order could have ever been made.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cSince the offending document uses this very file nape \u2018909- CARBPL1501-19-CuDOC\u2019, it necessarily follows that though allegedly dated 1st December 2019, the offending document could have been generated or fabricated only after 23rd December 2019.\u201d<\/p>\n

It seems there are glaring indicators of this document being fabricated, forged and got up.<\/p>\n

Purpose of this forgery is evident from paragraph 7 because it seeks to create rights in favour of the so-called petitioner.<\/p>\n

He further observed that,<\/p>\n

Satishchandra Goradia died just 15 days ago. This order was brought to the notice by the learned Advocates, Mr Umesh Vasant Mohite and Advocate Ms Hetal Arvind Pandya by Mr Parth Goradia, grand nephew (Satishchandra’s brother’s son’s son). Parth states that he obtained this document from his father, and that his father, in turn, obtained it from one Mr Ashok Vageriya.\u201d<\/p>\n

On enquiring with Chamber staff,\u00a0 it was found that there is no Advocate Ashok Vageriya registered with an Advocate\u2019s code in this Court\u2019s System or records, nor is there a registered Clerk of any such person.<\/p>\n

Justice Patel has asked the Registrar (Legal & Research) to take immediately:<\/p>\n