{"id":225854,"date":"2020-02-18T10:27:57","date_gmt":"2020-02-18T04:57:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=225854"},"modified":"2020-02-20T10:09:26","modified_gmt":"2020-02-20T04:39:26","slug":"raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty CJ, and Ashok Kumar Gaur J., dismissed a Public Interest Litigation alleging the online game \u201cDream 11\u201d of committing offence of betting and gambling.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the petitioner filed a PIL with a grievance that the online game \u201cDream 11\u201d should be declared involving betting and gambling. The petitioner prayed in his petition that the Court may pass suitable order\/s to prohibit the stated game and also measures needs to be undertaken in order to prohibit the commission of offences of gambling.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Additional Advocate General representing the respondents, Rajesh Maharshi, filed a reply to the above petition contending that the issues in hand has been discussed by various High Courts and the legality of the game has been upheld. The respondents submitted that as per Section 12 of the Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949, the game involving \u201cmere skill\u201d is exempted from the applicability of the Act\/Ordinance and since \u201cDream 11\u201d game has been held to be a game of skill and not a game of chance.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The advocate representing the petitioner, Mr Sunil Kumar Singh, submitted that the State authorities have miserably failed to discharge their statutory obligation of preventing such game which is played by the innocent people and they indulge themselves in gambling and betting.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court upon analysing the facts and circumstances declared that the online game did not involve elements of gambling or betting and the State authorities have not violated any statutory obligations.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court placed reliance on the directions of the Punjab and High Court decision, <em>Varun Gumber<\/em> v. <em>Union Territory of Chandigarh<\/em> 2017 Cri.L.J. 3827 wherein it was decided: <em>\u201cThe respondent company&#8217;s website and success in Dream 11&#8217;s fantasy sports basically arises out of users exercise, superior knowledge, judgment and attention\u2026. Equally so, before I conclude, I must express that gambling is not a trade and thus, is not protected by Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India and thus, the fantasy games of the respondent-company cannot said to be falling within the gambling activities as the same involves the substantial skills which is nothing but is a business activity\u201d<\/em> The Court also relied on the Division Bench judgment of the Bombay High Court <em>Gurdeep Singh Sachar<\/em> v. <em>Union of India<\/em> Criminal Public Interest Litigation Stamp No. 22 of 2019 which upheld the legality of the game and upon challenge to the Supreme Court, the Apex Court had dismissed the challenge. The Bombay High Court had stated: <em>\u201cOnly if the result of the game\/contest is determined merely by chance or accident, any money put on stake with consciousness of risk and hope to gain, would be &#8216;gambling&#8217; or &#8216;betting&#8217;. There is no merit in the submission that the result of their fantasy game\/contest shall be considered as merely by chance or accident notwithstanding involvement of substantial skill.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Division Bench also held that the game did not involve any form of gambling since the result of the fantasy game also did not depend on winning or losing any particular team in the real world on any given day. The present Court dismissed the PIL being unable to find any merit in the prayers of the petitioner.[Chandresh Sankhla v. State Of Rajasthan, <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/DWqHcX3R\">2020 SCC OnLine Raj 264<\/a>,<\/b> decided on 14-02-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty CJ, and Ashok Kumar Gaur J., dismissed a Public Interest Litigation alleging the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8221,39650,30412,2832],"class_list":["post-225854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-betting","tag-dream-11","tag-gambling","tag-public_interest_litigation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty CJ, and Ashok Kumar Gaur J., dismissed a Public Interest Litigation alleging the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-18T04:57:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-20T04:39:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-18T04:57:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-20T04:39:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty CJ, and Ashok Kumar Gaur J., dismissed a Public Interest Litigation alleging the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-18T04:57:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-20T04:39:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/","name":"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-02-18T04:57:57+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-20T04:39:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/18\/raj-hc-online-fantasy-game-dream-11-does-not-involve-offences-of-betting-and-gambling-court-dismisses-pil\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Online fantasy game -\u201cDream 11\u201d does not involve offences of betting and gambling; Court dismisses PIL"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":365752,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/04\/ban-on-online-betting-games-operating-as-e-sports-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":225854,"position":0},"title":"Supreme Court issues notice in petition seeking ban on online gambling\/betting games operating in the guise of e-sports games","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioners further stated that there are about two thousand Online Apps operating relating to betting and gambling and stated that the government should take immediate action in this regard in larger public interest.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"online betting","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/online-betting.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/online-betting.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/online-betting.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/online-betting.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296257,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/07\/delhi-hc-dismiss-pil-challenging-method-of-empanelment-gov-advocates-representing-uoi\/","url_meta":{"origin":225854,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court dismisses PIL challenging method of empanelment of Government Advocates by calling it a &#8216;Publicity Interest Litigation&#8217;","author":"Arunima","date":"July 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that it seems that the petitioner, who is an Advocate, filed the present petition after being a beneficiary of the very same process only because he has been denied extension or reappointment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":206198,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/04\/sinister-act-of-wife-seeking-remedy-through-pil-to-foster-personal-vendetta-against-husband-not-in-public-interest-petition-declined-karnataka-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":225854,"position":2},"title":"Sinister act of wife seeking remedy through PIL to foster personal vendetta against husband not in public interest: Karnataka HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Dinesh Maheshwari, CJ and S. Sujatha, JJ. dismissed a PIL and condemned the act of petitioner wife who had filed the said petition for her personal interests in the garb of public interest. The instant petition was filed praying for a writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":229416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/05\/13\/del-hc-pil-filed-without-any-ground-work-and-any-thought-to-it-court-dismisses-petition-seeking-effective-measures-for-sex-workers-and-lgbtq-community-during-covid-19\/","url_meta":{"origin":225854,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | PIL filed without &#8220;any ground work&#8221; and any &#8220;thought to it&#8221;; Court dismisses petition seeking effective measures for sex workers and LGBTQ community during COVID-19","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 13, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ., dismissed a petition raising concerns for the welfare of LGBTQI Community, as the same was filed without any ground work. Public Interest Litigation was filed to seek direction to respondent to take effective measures to provide\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":279625,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/14\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-pilagainst-koffee-with-karanfiled-with-the-object-to-gain-publicity\/","url_meta":{"origin":225854,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL against \u2018Koffee with Karan&#8217;, filed with the object \u201cto gain publicity\u201d","author":"Editor","date":"December 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The PIL had alleged that the talk show \u201cKoffee with Karan\u201d, hosted by Karan Johar, was promoting racism, sexuality and obscenity through words or visible representation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":196805,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/08\/participation-of-more-than-one-party-is-necessary-in-order-to-constitute-an-offence-of-gambling\/","url_meta":{"origin":225854,"position":5},"title":"Participation of more than one party is necessary in order to constitute an offence of gambling","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of K.N. Phanendra, J. allowed a criminal petition and quashed the proceedings pending against the petitioner for the offence under Section 78(6) of\u00a0 Karnataka Police Act. The petitioners were accused of betting for an IPL match between Gujarat Lions and Mumbai Indians.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225854\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}