{"id":225175,"date":"2020-02-05T09:30:44","date_gmt":"2020-02-05T04:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=225175"},"modified":"2020-02-12T11:55:59","modified_gmt":"2020-02-12T06:25:59","slug":"chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/","title":{"rendered":"Chh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence"},"content":{"rendered":"

Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Full Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra, Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant and Gautam Chourdiya, JJ., has held that the prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into a cognizable offence. The Court was answering the question formulated by the Single Judge.<\/p>\n

The daughter of the petitioner was married to one Mithilesh Kumar. The petitioner alleged that on account of ill-treatment and demand of dowry, his daughter committed suicide by hanging. He filed an application before the police against Mithilesh and his family members. Since no action was taken by the police, the petitioner filed the writ petition seeking a direction to the police authorities to register FIR and arrest Mithilesh and his family members for committing offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC. The Single Judge before whom the petition was placed, referred the following question for an effective pronouncement by the Full Bench:<\/p>\n

“Whether in a writ petition preferred under Article 226, 227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation against the accused persons alleged to have committed the cognizable offence(s), the said accused persons are necessary or proper party and they are required to be noticed and heard before issuing any such writ\/direction, if any?”<\/em><\/p>\n

Relying on a catena of decisions including\u00a0Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P.,\u00a0<\/em>(2014) 2 SCC 1<\/a>;\u00a0Union of India v. WN Chadha,\u00a0<\/em>1993 Supp (4) SCC 260<\/a>;\u00a0Anju Chaudhary v. State of U.P.,\u00a0<\/em>(2013) 6 SCC 384<\/a>; etc., the High Court observed:\u00a0“In the above view of the matter, it is an absolutely settled legal position that a prospective accused has no right of hearing before registration of FIR and investigation by the police officer or before the Court including the writ court, therefore, in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into a cognizable offence, the prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Full Bench answered the reference accordingly and directed the matter to be placed before the appropriate Bench for further proceedings. [Dhananjay Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh,\u00a02020 SCC OnLine Chh 4<\/b><\/a>, decided on 30-01-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Full Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra, Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant and Gautam Chourdiya, JJ., has held that the prospective <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33741,29497,34190,31299,13551],"class_list":["post-225175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizable-offence","tag-registration-of-fir","tag-section-304-b-ipc","tag-section-498-a-ipc","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"\nChh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Full Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra, Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant and Gautam Chourdiya, JJ., has held that the prospective\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-05T04:00:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-12T06:25:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/\",\"name\":\"Chh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-05T04:00:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-12T06:25:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence","og_description":"Chhattisgarh High Court:\u00a0A Full Bench of Prashant Kumar Mishra, Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant and Gautam Chourdiya, JJ., has held that the prospective","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-02-05T04:00:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-12T06:25:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/chattisgarh_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/","name":"Chh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-02-05T04:00:44+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-12T06:25:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/05\/chh-hc-prospective-accused-is-neither-necessary-nor-a-proper-party-in-a-writ-petition-seeking-direction-for-registration-of-fir-and-investigation-into-cognizable-offence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chh HC | Prospective accused is neither necessary nor a proper party in a writ petition seeking direction for registration of FIR and investigation into cognizable offence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214652,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/guj-hc-plea-seeking-registration-of-fir-allowed-with-instructions-to-police-officials-to-complete-inquiry-in-stipulated-time\/","url_meta":{"origin":225175,"position":0},"title":"Guj HC | Plea seeking registration of FIR allowed with instructions to police officials to complete inquiry in stipulated time","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: A Bench of Sonia Gokani, J., while hearing the grievance of the petitioner regarding non-filing of FIR, ordered the authorities to do a necessary investigation after lodging FIR. A writ petition was made by the petitioner who was aggrieved by non-registration of the first information report on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/1200px-Gujarat-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/17\/no-preliminary-enquiry-needed-for-fir-against-student-leader-for-cognizable-offence-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":225175,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Forcibly entry to school, death threats, scuffles with Police\u2019, No preliminary enquiry needed for FIR against Student Leader for cognizable offence: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that the objective of a preliminary inquiry is to screen out frivolous and motivated complaints, not to ascertain the veracity of the information received.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357120,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/20\/ph-hc-refuses-to-quash-defamation-case-against-tv-today-network\/","url_meta":{"origin":225175,"position":2},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court dismisses petition to set aside defamation case against TV Today Network","author":"Editor","date":"August 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"It remains undisputed on record that the complaint filed by Respondent 2 has disclosed commission of non-cognizable offence by the TV Today Network.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"defamation case against TV Today","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/defamation-case-against-TV-Today.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/defamation-case-against-TV-Today.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/defamation-case-against-TV-Today.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/defamation-case-against-TV-Today.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240253,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/07\/chh-hc-whether-writ-of-mandamus-be-filed-under-art-226-of-the-constitution-of-india-directing-the-jurisdictional-police-to-register-an-offence-under-s-1541-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":225175,"position":3},"title":"Chh HC | Whether writ of mandamus be filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India directing the jurisdictional police to register an offence under S. 154(1) CrPC?","author":"Editor","date":"December 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K. Agrawal J. dismissed the petition based on settled position of law. \u00a0The facts of the case are such that the respondents 5 to 12 and investigate the matter against them through Special Investigation team. Hence, The question for consideration is whether a writ of mandamus\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/","url_meta":{"origin":225175,"position":4},"title":"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The instant petition was entertained by Ravindra Maithani, J. where the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC applied for quashing of the chargesheet and impugned cognizance order for offence under Section 420 IPC, which was pending before Civil Judge.\u00a0 Petitioner had stated that an FIR was lodged in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":201785,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/14\/directions-regarding-the-registration-of-fir-arrest-and-bail-in-cases-under-section-498-a-ipc-reiterated-and-modified-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":225175,"position":5},"title":"Directions regarding the registration of FIR, arrest and bail in cases under Section 498-A IPC reiterated and modified: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 14, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of CJ Dipak Misra and A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ., while disposing of a writ petition related to Section 498-A IPC, modified the directions concerning registration of FIR, arrest and bail under the said section as given in a recent judgment in Rajesh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225175"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225175\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}