{"id":224565,"date":"2020-01-27T11:30:44","date_gmt":"2020-01-27T06:00:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=224565"},"modified":"2020-01-31T10:49:10","modified_gmt":"2020-01-31T05:19:10","slug":"ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/","title":{"rendered":"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Orissa High Court: <\/strong>Biswanath Rath, J. dismissed the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the quashing of the order whereby the petitioner herein was punished for discharging his duty dishonestly and also sought reinstatement of the petitioner in his service with all the consequential benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant case, the petitioner who was the Branch Manager in State Bank of Hyderabad GCP, Bhubaneswar Branch was handed a charge memo with allegations of his failure of discharging his duty with good faith. Further, an enquiry officer was appointed by the Disciplinary Authority (General Manager) to look into the matter. Subsequently, the petitioner denied the aforesaid allegations and finding it to be against natural justice filed the present writ petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B. Tripathy, the counsel for the petitioner, pleaded that the enquiry report thereafter provided without informing the petitioner suffered on account of non-supply of document applied for. It did not provide the opportunity of examination of the witnesses of the petitioner and of himself. There was no opportunity to show cause before the imposition of punishment of penalty of compulsory retirement. Appeal was not considered on the grounds raised. Further, the procedure followed by the enquiry officer was also unknown to law. Moreover, the General Manager had no authority to impose punishment merely on the basis of the above-said report and thus the counsel requested for the impugned order of punishment to be nullified to restore the petitioner\u2019s original position.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">However, the counsel for the respondent, S. P. Das contended that the petitioner was given the first chargesheet after finding a series of irregularities in his work examined by the Assistant general manager himself. He was also asked to file a show cause thereof. He was given a reasonable time of fifteen days and also an extension of another fifteen days on request. But finding his response unsatisfactory, order for the departmental enquiry was made. Also, the petitioner was given sufficient time to verify his records in the branch office so his claim of non-supply of documents was also false. Further, the benefit of the doubt given by the CBI(Central Bureau of Investigation) Court to the petitioner did not have any bearing on the enquiry. In the context of presenting witnesses, the petitioner himself denied to present any. Further as far as imposition of punishment was concerned, at no occasion, the management made such declaration. So all the allegations made on part of the petitioner thereby fail.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view thereof, the Court found that the impugned order was not passed by an incompetent officer as has been alleged by the petitioner. It also found that the petitioner was given a reasonable time to get his documents verified. It opined that only after the unsatisfactory reply of the petitioner, the enquiry was initiated. It took into cognizance that there was no complain made by the petitioner during the enquiry to present his witnesses. It made it clear that the petitioner had to get a clean-chit not just in CBI enquiry but also in the departmental proceedings. Therefore holding that there is no merit in this present writ petition brought up by the petitioner, the Court dismissed it. [Bansidhar Senapati v. SBI, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/dlPdUTW2\"><b>2020 SCC OnLine Ori 10<\/b><\/a>, decided on 17-01-2020]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Orissa High Court: Biswanath Rath, J. dismissed the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[34698,31981,32552],"class_list":["post-224565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-central-bureau-of-investigation","tag-departmental-proceedings","tag-writ-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Orissa High Court: Biswanath Rath, J. dismissed the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-01-27T06:00:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-01-31T05:19:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/\",\"name\":\"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-27T06:00:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-01-31T05:19:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority","og_description":"Orissa High Court: Biswanath Rath, J. dismissed the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-01-27T06:00:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-01-31T05:19:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/orissa-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/","name":"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-01-27T06:00:44+00:00","dateModified":"2020-01-31T05:19:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/ori-hc-writ-court-is-not-competent-to-appreciate-the-evidence-and-findings-by-the-disciplinary-enquiry-authority\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ori HC | Writ Court is not competent to appreciate the evidence and findings by the Disciplinary\/ Enquiry Authority"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":274588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/manipur-high-court-natural-justice-disciplinary-proceedings-enquiry-officer-presiding-officer-central-reserve-police-force-departmental-enquiry-writ-petition-legal-research-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":224565,"position":0},"title":"Absence from duty without leave under CRPF is a gravest misconduct; Manipur High Court upheld order of Disciplinary Authority of dismissal from service","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Manipur High Court: In a writ petition filed to quash the dismissal order dated 18.1.2005 on the ground that it has violated the principles of natural justice and during the departmental enquiry, the Enquiry Officer proceeded the disciplinary proceedings without the Presiding Officer, thus, not affording a reasonable\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Manipur High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/MicrosoftTeams-image-23-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/16\/jhar-hc-hearing-delinquent-employee-necessary-where-disciplinary-authority-defers-from-finding-of-enquiry-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":224565,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Hearing delinquent employee necessary where disciplinary authority defers from finding of enquiry officer","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. quashed the order which inflicted the punishment of non-payment of the salary of petitioner for a period of time during which a criminal case was lodged against the petitioner.\u00a0 The petitioner filed this writ petition for quashing order whereby the petitioner has been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":241330,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/26\/jhar-hc-service-law-in-a-case-past-two-decade-court-observes-procedural-irregularity-at-the-behest-of-disciplinary-authority-issues-direction-for-consequential-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":224565,"position":2},"title":"Jhar HC | [Service Law] In a case past two decade, Court observes procedural irregularity at the behest of Disciplinary authority; issues direction for consequential benefits","author":"Editor","date":"December 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Deepak Roshan, J., while allowing the present writ application, said, \u201cThis court is having no hesitation to hold that there is a procedural irregularity in passing the impugned order of punishment. As such, the impugned order of punishment and all subsequent orders deserve to be quashed and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":308518,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-disciplinary-actions-against-employees-for-proven-misconduct-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":224565,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds Bank\u2019s right to take disciplinary action against employees for proven misconduct","author":"Ritu","date":"December 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny misconduct on the part of the bank employee\/ officer can be meted out with disciplinary action in accordance with the service rules and regulations.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-irregular-grant-of-bail-may-reflect-upon-competency-of-the-judge-but-does-not-mean-that-he-is-corrupt-compulsory-retirement-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":224565,"position":4},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Irregular grant of bail may reflect upon competency of the Judge but does not mean that he is corrupt; Compulsory retirement set aside","author":"Editor","date":"July 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. allowed a writ petition and issued several directions setting aside the compulsory retirement of the petitioner from judicial services. Petitioner had joined Madhya Pradesh Judicial Services as a Civil Judge Class-II on 25-10-1985. He was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/24\/departmental-proceedings-cannot-be-continued-after-superannuation-of-employee-unless-provided-by-service-rules-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":224565,"position":5},"title":"Departmental Proceedings cannot be continued after superannuation of employee unless provided under the Service Rules: Orissa HC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"May 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court said that even if the Departmental Proceeding was initiated prior to the superannuation of the delinquent employee, the same cannot be continued unless specifically provided under the Service Rules.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-508.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224565\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}