{"id":224360,"date":"2020-01-22T11:00:45","date_gmt":"2020-01-22T05:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=224360"},"modified":"2020-01-22T10:53:34","modified_gmt":"2020-01-22T05:23:34","slug":"fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Appellate Tribunal (FEMA): <\/b>Justice G.C. Mishra (Acting Chairman) allowed the application for the condonation of delay in respect to the substitution of the legal representatives (LRs) of the managing director of the deceased Ramesh Babu Muppalaneni of the company Sanjay Agro Traders (P) Ltd.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>In the instant case, the deceased having died on 26-10-2017, the appellant failed to file an application for the substitution of his legal heirs. Rather the application for its condonation of delay was filed on 27-05-2019, which prayed to condone a delay of 296 days only though there was a delay of 370 days.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsels for the appellant, S.K. Vasudeva Rao and Rabin Majumder pleaded that the delay in filing the application for the substitution of the LRs was not intentional but it happened due to the communication gap between the deceased\u2019s family and the counsel about the death of the deceased which reached the counsel much later on 05-09-2018 as the family was much disturbed from their irreparable loss. Moreover, on 06-09-2018 itself, the Tribunal allowed the appellant to file an appropriate application in that regard when he submitted for it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel on behalf of the respondent, Aagam Kaur, however, contended that even though the family was in grief, the advocate could have moved an application for bringing the legal heirs on record. Also, there seemed no reasonable cause as to how he was prevented from moving a timely application. The Counsel also placed reliance on the judgment of the case <i>N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnanmurthy, <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hQ0XD4m3\">(1998) 7 SCC 123<\/a><i> <\/i>wherein it was clearly held that the law of limitation fixes a lifespan for such legal remedy for the redressal of the legal injury so suffered.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above case, the Tribunal allowed the application of condonation of delay in filing the applications for substitution of legal heirs subject to payment of Rs 25000 in each appeal to be paid within six weeks from the date of the order.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Observing <i>\u201csufficient cause\u201d under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 <\/i>the Court noted the concept of reasonableness as brought out by the case <i>Esha Bhattacharjee v. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur Nafar Academy<\/i>,<i> <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XF6oy3Vk\">(2013) 12 SCC 649<\/a><i>.<\/i>[S. Ramesh v. Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad, MP-FE-476\/HYD\/2019(COD) IN FPA-FE-300\/HYD\/2009, decided on 24-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Appellate Tribunal (FEMA): Justice G.C. Mishra (Acting Chairman) allowed the application for the condonation of delay in respect to the substitution of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":214419,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[8991,2552,33051,30719,32319],"class_list":["post-224360","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","tag-appeal","tag-Condonation_of_delay","tag-legal-representatives","tag-section-5-of-limitation-act","tag-sufficient-cause"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Appellate Tribunal (FEMA): Justice G.C. Mishra (Acting Chairman) allowed the application for the condonation of delay in respect to the substitution of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-01-22T05:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-22T05:30:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":407,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/05\\\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Appeal\",\"Condonation of delay\",\"Legal Representatives\",\"Section 5 of Limitation Act\",\"Sufficient Cause\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/\",\"name\":\"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/05\\\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-22T05:30:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/05\\\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/05\\\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2020\\\/01\\\/22\\\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal","og_description":"Appellate Tribunal (FEMA): Justice G.C. Mishra (Acting Chairman) allowed the application for the condonation of delay in respect to the substitution of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-01-22T05:30:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal","datePublished":"2020-01-22T05:30:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/"},"wordCount":407,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg","keywords":["Appeal","Condonation of delay","Legal Representatives","Section 5 of Limitation Act","Sufficient Cause"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/","name":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg","datePublished":"2020-01-22T05:30:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/fema-appellate-tribunal-delay-of-370-days-condoned-despite-not-being-convinced-of-sufficient-cause-for-delay-as-dismissal-of-application-would-bar-examination-of-merits-of-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"FEMA Appellate Tribunal | Delay of 370 days condoned despite not being convinced of \u2018sufficient cause\u2019 for delay, as dismissal of application would bar examination of merits of appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-UNDER-SAFEMA-ACT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224360\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/214419"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}