{"id":224214,"date":"2020-01-14T14:51:08","date_gmt":"2020-01-14T09:21:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=224214"},"modified":"2020-02-27T16:07:11","modified_gmt":"2020-02-27T10:37:11","slug":"aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL):<\/b><b> <\/b>A Coram of Justice Manjula Chellur (Chairperson) and S.D. Dubey, (Technical Member) allowed<b> <\/b>an appeal filed against an impugned order passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the appellant Anand K. Ganesan, Swapna Seshadri,<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>Ashwin Ramanathan and Utkarsh Singh had submitted that in 2011 the transmission system in issue was not required for the Applicant\/Appellant in view of the Appellant being unable to obtain the Consent for Establishment (CFE) from the Pollution Control Board. This non-issuance of the CFE was beyond the control of the Applicant\/Appellant and therefore a force majeure under the Bulk Power Transmission Agreement was entered into between the parties and further a petition had been filed before the Central Commission seeking directions on the declaration of force majeure and also return on the bank guarantee retained by Powergrid. The Central commission had disposed of the petition holding that the Applicant\/Appellant had acted bona fide aggrieved by which the Applicant\/Appellant had preferred an appeal which was pending before this tribunal and they further submitted that the delay was not deliberate but on bona fide reasons.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal while allowing the appeal condoned the delay of 148 days and found that the reasoning assigned in the application explaining the delay in filing the Appeal was satisfactory. [PEL Power Ltd. v. CERC, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/WH4wYM9d\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine APTEL 115<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): A Coram of Justice Manjula Chellur (Chairperson) and S.D. Dubey, (Technical Member) allowed an appeal filed against <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[8991,3981,39255,2652,15811],"class_list":["post-224214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-appeal","tag-bank-guarantee","tag-bonafide-delay","tag-Central_Electricity_Regulatory_Commission","tag-force-majeure"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-\u2502-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): A Coram of Justice Manjula Chellur (Chairperson) and S.D. Dubey, (Technical Member) allowed an appeal filed against\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-\u2502-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-01-14T09:21:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-27T10:37:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/\",\"name\":\"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-14T09:21:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-27T10:37:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-\u2502-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal","og_description":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): A Coram of Justice Manjula Chellur (Chairperson) and S.D. Dubey, (Technical Member) allowed an appeal filed against","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-\u2502-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-01-14T09:21:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-27T10:37:11+00:00","author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/","name":"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-01-14T09:21:08+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-27T10:37:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/aptel-%e2%94%82-bonafide-delay-can-be-condoned-tribunal-condones-delay-of-148-days-while-allowing-the-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"APTEL | Bonafide delay can be condoned; Tribunal condones delay of 148 days while allowing the appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":251715,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/26\/solar-project\/","url_meta":{"origin":224214,"position":0},"title":"APTEL | Whether there was bona fide delay in commissioning the solar power project? Tribunal answers","author":"Editor","date":"July 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): The Coram of Manjula Chellur (Chairperson) and Ravindra Kumar Verma, Technical Member (Electricity) allowed an appeal which was filed against the Order of Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission) whereby, the Commission has held that the Applicant\/Appellant was not entitled to extension of time for commissioning\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203777,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/15\/appellate-tribunal-for-electricity-reinforces-principles-of-natural-justice-sets-aside-central-electricity-regulatory-commissions-order-for-being-a-non-speaking-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":224214,"position":1},"title":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity reinforces principles of natural justice; sets aside Central Electricity Regulatory Commission\u2019s order","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 15, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi: A Division bench comprising of N.K. Patil, J. and\u00a0S.D. Dubey (Technical Member) allowed an appeal, filed against Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, holding that the order of Commission was a non-speaking order. Appellant, a joint venture company between National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. and Uttar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260935,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/01\/state-commission-disallows-benefit-of-increase-in-the-tariff-based-on-the-change-in-law-provision\/","url_meta":{"origin":224214,"position":2},"title":"APTEL | State commission disallows benefit of increase in the tariff based on the change in law provision; Tribunal directs reconsideration","author":"Editor","date":"February 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): A Coram of R.K. Gauba (Officiating Chairperson) and Sandesh Kumar Sharma (Technical Member) decided on an appeal which was filed by Solar Power Project Developer (\u201cSPD\u201d) assailing order passed by respondent Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission (\u201cthe State Commission\u201d) disallowing the benefit of increase in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334471,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/05\/aptel-denies-condonation-delay-ndmc-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":224214,"position":3},"title":"APTEL denies condonation of delay in NDMC\u2019s Appeal, finding delay due to administrative inefficiencies as insufficient cause","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"APTEL said that the sufficient cause to be shown by an applicant, for the delay to be condoned, would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case, it would not be justified to apply a uniform criterion to determine whether the cause shown is sufficient to condone the delay\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Condonation of delay","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/blog-_30_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/blog-_30_.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/blog-_30_.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/blog-_30_.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214960,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/23\/aptel-maintenance-of-judicial-discipline-is-part-of-judicial-process-tribunal-directs-implementation-of-order\/","url_meta":{"origin":224214,"position":4},"title":"APTEL | Maintenance of Judicial discipline is part of judicial process; Tribunal directs implementation of order","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL): A Division Bench of Manjula Chellur, J. (Member) and S.D. Dubey, (Technical Member) passed an order for implementation of the Tribunal\u2019s order for the payment of the sum of money due with interest. An application for the implementation of the order was made by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Electricity1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/28\/maharashtra-state-electricity-distribution-co-ltd-directed-to-pay-dues-of-rs-2-300-crore-to-the-ratnagiri-gas-and-power-pvt-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":224214,"position":5},"title":"Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. directed to pay dues of Rs 2,300 crore to the Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd.","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 28, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL):\u00a0While upholding the order of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission vide which Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. (MSEDCL) was directed to pay the capacity charges and energy charges as per terms and conditions of the Power Purchase Agreement, APTEL asked MSEDCL to pay dues of Rs\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tribunals\/Commissions\/Regulatory Bodies","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224214","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}