{"id":224212,"date":"2020-01-14T12:30:11","date_gmt":"2020-01-14T07:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=224212"},"modified":"2020-01-31T11:48:28","modified_gmt":"2020-01-31T06:18:28","slug":"nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/","title":{"rendered":"NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):<\/b> A.I.S. Cheema, J. while deciding the present Company Appeal held that the dissenting Financial Creditor in COC cannot be allowed to scuttle CIRP process otherwise the provision permitting COC to take decisions with regard to subjects stated in Section 28(1) by given majority of 66 percent under Section 28(3) would be rendered nugatory.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter, the Resolution Professional had filed an MA, under Section 60(5) (c) read with Sections 25(1), 25(2) (c) and 28(1) (a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, before the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Division Bench, Chennai) to issue a certification approving Interim Finance and any costs related to it, as it forms part of the insolvency resolution process cost and has to be shared between all the members of the Committee of Creditors, in the proportion of their voting rights.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This application was allowed and the COC members were directed to release the Letter of Comfort.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Against developments as above, EARC filed an appeal claiming in view of the amendment to Section 30(4) of IBC read with Section 52(8) of IBC; Insolvency Resolution Process costs which include interim finance can only be recovered from secured creditors and not from unsecured creditors like Appellant. His appeal further raised ground of not being heard before passing the order thereby violating principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The learned counsel for Resolution Professional submitted that the RP is responsible to keep the corporate debtor a going concern. It was further submitted that there was an urgency to seek orders of the Adjudicating Authority as the appellant was not ready to release the Letter of Comfort and the default would have led to render the corporate debtor ineligible to participate in the tender for power supply.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal opined that the appellant has the right to dissent in a COC meeting, but if the decision is still taken by the majority provided under the statute, all of COC members are duty-bound to abide by the decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Reliance was placed on the case of <i>K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank, <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/208UfC8q\">2019 SCC OnLine SC 257<\/a>, where it was stated that the commercial wisdom of individual Financial Creditor is non-justiciable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above, the appeal was dismissed and no orders as to costs were given; holding that the appellant had not made out a good case that if it was heard, impugned order could have been different. The tribunal found principles of natural justice to be satisfied but could not draw such an interpretation of Sub-Section (4) of Section 30 so as to require only Secured Financial Creditors to contribute towards interim finance and not the Unsecured Financial Creditors.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>[Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. v. Sai Regency Power Corpn. (P) Ltd, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wvEEeJ0P\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine NCLAT 921<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A.I.S. Cheema, J. while deciding the present Company Appeal held that the dissenting Financial Creditor in <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":153604,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[39253,25934,34025,39254],"class_list":["post-224212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-coc-meeting","tag-financial-creditor","tag-resolution-professional","tag-right-to-dissent"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A.I.S. Cheema, J. while deciding the present Company Appeal held that the dissenting Financial Creditor in\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-01-14T07:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-01-31T06:18:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"844\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-14T07:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-01-31T06:18:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":844},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law","og_description":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A.I.S. Cheema, J. while deciding the present Company Appeal held that the dissenting Financial Creditor in","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-01-14T07:00:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-01-31T06:18:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":844,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/","name":"NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","datePublished":"2020-01-14T07:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2020-01-31T06:18:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","width":1330,"height":844},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/14\/nclat-dissenting-financial-creditor-cannot-be-allowed-to-scramble-cirp-process-only-the-collective-decision-of-committee-of-creditors-is-enforceable-by-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"NCLAT |\u00a0Dissenting financial creditor cannot be allowed to scramble CIRP process; only the collective decision of Committee of Creditors is enforceable by law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":307140,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/15\/nclat-determines-how-to-distribute-corporate-debtors-assets-to-secured-creditors-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":224212,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Admitted Claim versus Security Interest\u2019; NCLAT determines how to distribute Corporate Debtor\u2019s assets to Secured Creditors","author":"Ritu","date":"November 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT reiterated that Commercial wisdom of the CoC is crucial in determining the viability and feasibility of a resolution plan.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/25\/nclat-deems-cocs-rejection-of-section-12a-of-ibc-proposal-unjustified-orders-creditor-distribution-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":224212,"position":1},"title":"IBC| NCLAT deems CoC\u2019s rejection of Section 12A proposal unjustified; orders remittance of deposited amount for creditor distribution","author":"Ritu","date":"January 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 12A was introduced in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, allowing the withdrawal of CIRP with the approval of 90% voting share of the CoC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344343,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/25\/withdrawal-of-cirp-oscillating-between-value-maximisation-and-plan-approval\/","url_meta":{"origin":224212,"position":2},"title":"Withdrawal of CIRP &mdash; Oscillating between Value Maximisation and Plan Approval","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Sidharth Sethi*, Shreya Sircar** and Kunal Saini***","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Experts Corner&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Experts Corner","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Withdrawal of CIRP","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Withdrawal-of-CIRP.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Withdrawal-of-CIRP.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Withdrawal-of-CIRP.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Withdrawal-of-CIRP.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/28\/operational-creditor-cannot-claim-payment-equal-to-financial-creditor-in-insolvency-proceeding-under-ibc-nclat\/","url_meta":{"origin":224212,"position":3},"title":"Operational Creditor cannot claim payment equal to Financial Creditor in Insolvency proceeding under IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The principle of equality is applicable only in same class of creditors, i.e., secured or unsecured, financial or operational.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":348725,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/26\/single-homebuyer-cant-challenge-coc-approved-resolution-plan-nclat-upholds-cocs-commercial-wisdom-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":224212,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Single Homebuyer can\u2019t challenge CoC approved Resolution Plan\u2019; NCLAT upholds CoC\u2019s commercial wisdom","author":"Ritu","date":"May 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Resolution Plan has been approved by 83.46% voting share of the CoC, therefore, at the instance of Appellant, approval of Resolution Plan cannot be allowed to be questioned.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":314223,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/15\/supreme-court-ibc-claim-cannot-overlooked-wrong-form-nclt-can-recall-resolution-plan-approval\/","url_meta":{"origin":224212,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court | NCLT can recall Resolution Plan approval despite misclassification of Creditor\u2019s claim under IBC on submission of proof","author":"Ridhi","date":"February 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The dues shown payable to the appellant was Rs. 13,47,40,819 while the appellant claimed it to be Rs. 43,40,31,951.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Resolution Plan","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Resolution-Plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Resolution-Plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Resolution-Plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Resolution-Plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=224212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/224212\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/153604"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=224212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=224212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=224212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}