{"id":223820,"date":"2020-01-04T09:30:28","date_gmt":"2020-01-04T04:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=223820"},"modified":"2020-01-10T13:23:48","modified_gmt":"2020-01-10T07:53:48","slug":"bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Ujjal Bhuyan, J., while deciding a writ petition, modified the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner whereby the question as to whether there is a delay in filing the related revision application was kept open, to be decided along with the revision application.<\/p>\n

The petitioners were resisting the maintainability of a revision application filed by one of the respondents in a certain matter regarding the appointment of one of the petitioners in the petitioner’s Trust. They contended that the revision application was filed belatedly, i.e., after the expiry of the period of limitation. The Joint Charity Commissioner, before whom the matter was placed, rejected the petitioner’s application at that stage and observed that point of the delay was kept open to be decided along with the main revision application. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioners approached the High Court.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the revision application filed by the respondent before the Joint Charity Commissioner was under Section 70-A of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. Under Section 70-A, the Charity Commissioner may invoke the jurisdiction in any of the cases mentioned in Section 70. While under Section 70 limitation period is prescribed, for invoking jurisdiction under Section 70-A in any of the cases mentioned in Section 70, no limitation period is prescribed. It was observed by the Court that whether revisional jurisdiction under Section 70-A has been invoked within a reasonable time or not would have to be decided in the facts and circumstances of each case having regard to the \u00a060 days limitation period prescribed for filing an appeal under Section 70.<\/p>\n

The High Court then noted that in respect of a provision where the limitation period is prescribed, if an appeal etc., is filed beyond such limitation period then it has to be accompanied by an application for condonation of delay. Only after the delay is condoned, the appeal, etc., can be taken up for consideration on merits. Before condonation of delay, the appellate authority would have no jurisdiction to hear the appeal on merits.<\/p>\n

In such view of the matter, the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner was modified and he was directed to first decide whether the revision application is within a reasonable time. However, for dealing with the above aspect, it would be not necessary to have separate proceedings, a common proceeding will suffice, but the point relating to whether the revision application has been filed within a reasonable period or not has to be decided first. If the decision is in the negative, proceeding further with the revision application would not be necessary. However, if the answer is in the affirmative then the revision application would have to be decided on its merits. [Subir Kumar Banerjee v. Neetu Singh, 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 6609<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0Ujjal Bhuyan, J., while deciding a writ petition, modified the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner whereby the question as <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[39117,39118,37363],"class_list":["post-223820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-joint-charity-commissioner","tag-point-of-limitation","tag-revision-application"],"yoast_head":"\nBom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Ujjal Bhuyan, J., while deciding a writ petition, modified the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner whereby the question as\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-01-04T04:00:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-01-10T07:53:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-04T04:00:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-01-10T07:53:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Ujjal Bhuyan, J., while deciding a writ petition, modified the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner whereby the question as","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-01-04T04:00:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-01-10T07:53:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/","name":"Bom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2020-01-04T04:00:28+00:00","dateModified":"2020-01-10T07:53:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/04\/bom-hc-incumbent-on-court-to-decide-point-of-limitation-before-considering-the-matter-on-merits-though-separate-proceedings-not-necessary\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | Incumbent on court to decide point of limitation before considering the matter on merits through separate proceedings not necessary"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":219005,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/02\/pat-hc-limitation-to-file-revision-application-denied-condonation-on-grounds-of-unexplained-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":223820,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Limitation to file revision application denied condonation on grounds of unexplained delay","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. disposed of the revision petition saying that the Court did not find any ground to condone such delay of over eleven years as there was absolutely no explanation that came from the petitioners. The petitioners approached the Court under Sections 397 and 401 of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240225,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/chh-hc-whether-in-a-criminal-proceeding-s-141-of-limitation-act-1963-would-be-applicable-court-not-to-apply-beneficent-provisions-in-a-pedantic-manner\/","url_meta":{"origin":223820,"position":1},"title":"Chh HC | Whether in a criminal proceeding, S. 14(1) of Limitation Act, 1963 would be applicable? Court not to apply beneficent provisions in a pedantic manner \u00a0","author":"Editor","date":"December 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Sanjay K Agrawal J., dismissed the petition being devoid of merits. The facts of the case are such that the respondent 1 \/ accused was discharged on 6-6-2011 against which the petitioner filed application for grant of leave to appeal with a delay of approximately 2 years,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":312052,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":223820,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation","author":"Ritu","date":"January 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that issue of limitation being a question of fact ought to have been raised before trial court and evidence ought to have been adduced.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":167814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/09\/revision-petition-order-dismissing-application-appointment-local-commissioner-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":223820,"position":3},"title":"Revision petition against the order dismissing application for appointment of Local Commissioner is not maintainable","author":"Saba","date":"November 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Recently before the High Court, a revision petition was filed against the order passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Meham, District Rohtak, dismissing the application for appointment of the Local Commissioner. The lower court had appointed the Local Commissioner to demarcate the suit property\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":271413,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/09\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-order-refusing-appointment-of-local-commissioner-under-order-xxvi-rule-9-of-cpc-1908-does-not-affect-rights-of-parties-no-revision-available\/","url_meta":{"origin":223820,"position":4},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Order refusing appointment of Local Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC, 1908 does not affect rights of parties; No revision available","author":"Editor","date":"August 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Alka Sarin, J., dismissed the revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution to set aside the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge vide which the application for appointment was dismissed on the ground that the order refusing appointment does not decide any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":192934,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/02\/28\/order-passed-commissioner-sales-tax-set-aside-grounds-limitation\/","url_meta":{"origin":223820,"position":5},"title":"Order passed by Commissioner of Sales Tax set aside on grounds of limitation","author":"Saba","date":"February 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: An order of revision of assessment passed against the petitioner by the Commissioner of Sales Tax was set aside by a Division Bench comprising of Vineet Saran, CJ and B.R. Sarangi, J., holding that under Rule 80 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, the revision proceedings has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223820\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}