{"id":223749,"date":"2020-01-02T14:00:38","date_gmt":"2020-01-02T08:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=223749"},"modified":"2020-01-08T17:01:35","modified_gmt":"2020-01-08T11:31:35","slug":"pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna<\/strong> High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench of Hemant Kumar Srivastava and Prabhat Kumar Singh, JJ. rejected a letters patent appeal on the admission stage itself to be allowed to solemnize the second marriage during the subsistence of the first marriage and found it being having no merits to stand.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, the appellant married his second wife during the lifetime of his first wife. When a departmental proceeding was initiated against him, he produced forged documents. Further, he was dismissed from service. Consequently, he challenged it. Later not only his appeal against the dismissal order but also its further revision against it was also dismissed by a Single Judge Bench.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the appellant, Arun Kumar pled that the appellant solemnized his second marriage with Sunita Upadhayay (second wife) with the permission and consent of his first wife which the Disciplinary Authority and the Single Judge Bench failed to take into consideration.<\/p>\n

The respondent\u2019s counsel, Manoj Kumar Singh contended that the aforesaid authorities had considered all the aspects of the matter. Moreover the appellant was also charged for forgery.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the Court opined that the Single Judge Bench had discussed the case in detail and passed the impugned judgment. It observed that even if the first wife consented to the appellant\u2019s marriage, it gave no right to the appellant to solemnize his second marriage. Moreover, the appellant failed to prove any violation of natural justice or any violation of rules. Further, the said factual aspect could not be looked into this Letters Patent Appeal. In view thereof, the appeal was dismissed.[Binod Kumar Singh v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Pat 2363<\/b><\/a>, dated on 02-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court: A Division Bench of Hemant Kumar Srivastava and Prabhat Kumar Singh, JJ. rejected a letters patent appeal on the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3239,31527,30908],"class_list":["post-223749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-consent","tag-first-marriage","tag-second-marriage"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: A Division Bench of Hemant Kumar Srivastava and Prabhat Kumar Singh, JJ. rejected a letters patent appeal on the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-01-02T08:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-01-08T11:31:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-01-02T08:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-01-08T11:31:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage","og_description":"Patna High Court: A Division Bench of Hemant Kumar Srivastava and Prabhat Kumar Singh, JJ. rejected a letters patent appeal on the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2020-01-02T08:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-01-08T11:31:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/","name":"Pat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-01-02T08:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2020-01-08T11:31:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/02\/pat-hc-consent-of-first-wife-for-solemnization-of-another-marriage-during-subsistence-of-second-marriage-does-not-validate-the-second-marriage\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Consent of first wife for solemnization of another marriage, during subsistence of second marriage, does not validate the second marriage"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":199006,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/25\/family-pension-denied-to-second-wife-as-marriage-was-solemnized-during-subsistence-of-first-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":223749,"position":0},"title":"Family pension denied to second wife as marriage was solemnized during subsistence of first marriage","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Mohammad Yaqoob Mir, CJ. dismissed a writ petition filed against the order of denial of family pension to the petitioner. Husband of the petitioner was in the Police Department under State of Meghalaya. After his death, the petitioner claimed family pension.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":305443,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/21\/delhi-hc-consent-of-parties-does-not-confer-validity-to-marriage-violating-section-5i-of-hindu-marriage-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":223749,"position":1},"title":"Consent of parties does not confer validity to marriage violating condition specified u\/s 5(i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe very fact that the wife had not only claimed but also accepted pendente lite maintenance during the appeal from the first husband fortifies that the marriage was not finally dissolved.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200433,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/21\/a-compromise-not-to-interfere-in-each-others-life-does-not-dissolve-first-marriage-second-marriage-held-void\/","url_meta":{"origin":223749,"position":2},"title":"A compromise not to interfere in each other’s life does not dissolve first marriage; second marriage held void","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 21, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Courts\u00a0 Act, 1984 challenging the order of Principal Judge whereby the marriage between the parties was declared null void. The husband filed a petition under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":268039,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/07\/whether-offence-of-bigamy-is-a-continuing-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":223749,"position":3},"title":"Whether offence of bigamy is a continuing offence or the proceedings instituted for offence punishable for bigamy under S. 494 CrPC can be obliterated on the ground of delay? Kar HC answers","author":"Editor","date":"June 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: M. Nagaprasanna, J. allowed the petition in part and remarked the protagonists in the quadrangle to resolve the issue amongst them and not drag other persons into the proceedings. The facts of the case are such that Petitioner 1 aged 76 years is the husband of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/New_Karnataka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":329075,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/21\/meghalaya-hc-upholds-assam-rifleman-dismissal-from-service-for-engaging-in-polygamy\/","url_meta":{"origin":223749,"position":4},"title":"Meghalaya High Court upholds Assam rifleman\u2019s dismissal from service for engaging in polygamy","author":"Editor","date":"August 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rule 10(2) of the Assam Rifles Rules, 2010 provides that \u201cany person subject to the Act, who contracts or enters into a second marriage during the lifetime of his first spouse, shall render himself ineligible for retention in service and may be dismissed, removed or retired from service on ground\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/17\/ori-hc-family-pension-to-second-wife-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":223749,"position":5},"title":"Second marriage during subsistence of first remains void despite first wife’s death; Orissa HC denies Family pension to second wife","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 17, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Hindu Marriage Act does not recognise childlessness as a justifiable circumstance for entering into wedlock with a person who is already in the subsisting wedlock with another.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Family pension to second wife","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Family-pension-to-second-wife.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223749","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223749"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223749\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223749"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223749"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223749"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}