{"id":223641,"date":"2019-12-27T12:30:11","date_gmt":"2019-12-27T07:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=223641"},"modified":"2019-12-27T12:30:11","modified_gmt":"2019-12-27T07:00:11","slug":"utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/","title":{"rendered":"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Uttaranchal High Court: <\/strong>Lok Pal Singh, J., addressed an application that sought to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 468, 471 of Penal Code, 1860 and Section 66(D) of Information Technology Act pending in Judicial Magistrate Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present matter, a complaint was lodged against the applicant that he committed forgery for purpose of cheating by using as genuine the forged and fraudulent document with the intention to cause damage to the Trust and hacked the information stored in the computer.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A charge-sheet was submitted by against the applicant in respect of selfsame offences. Further, Magistrate took cognizance and summoned the applicant to face the trial in respect to the mentioned offences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Siddhartha Singh, applicant for the counsel submitted that the applicant was an old trustee and was appointed as the President of Kailashanand Mission Trust. He submitted that proceedings against the applicant are nothing but the outcome of the revengeful activity of the complainant and his associates. Complainant concealed the fact of the applicant being the President of the Trust and went on to lodging an FIR against him in the name of him being an <strong>\u201cUnknown Hacker\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to the applicant\u2019s counsel, the entire proceedings are nothing but an abuse of process of law and Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Senior Advocate, Rakesh Thapliyal on behalf of the complainant due to nefarious activities of the applicant, Swami Kailashanand was annoyed with him and by way of a resolution of trust, he cancelled all rights of the applicant and even removed him from the post of Manager of Trust.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">He further submitted that various complaints were filed against the applicant for <strong>forging Trust\u2019s letter pad, seals and receipt book and resolutions.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Applicant\u2019s Counsel while relying on the Supreme Court case in, <em>International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials (ARCI) v Nimra Cerglass Technics (P) Ltd<\/em>., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/LQqNQOc5\">(2016) 1 SCC 348<\/a>, argued that <strong>in order to bring a case for offence of cheating, it is not merely sufficient to prove that a false representation was made, but it is further necessary to prove that the representation was false to the knowledge of accused<\/strong> and was made in order to deceive complainant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to the ruling in Supreme Court case of <em>Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander, <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/07O8WLFb\">(2012) 9 SCC 460<\/a><em>, <\/em>in which certain principles in respect of exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC are laid down, one of the principles which hold significance in the present matter is following:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u201c&#8230;Court should apply the test as to whether the uncontroverted allegations as made from the record of the case and the documents submitted therewith prima facie establish the offence or not.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Thus, in the present matter, High Court stated that <\/strong>in view of the above, a bare perusal of FIR as well as the charge sheet, it is apparent that foundation of criminal offence is laid against the applicant. Jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution. Court stated that in the present case, this is not the stage to quash the charge sheet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence, Since, prima facie case is made out against the applicant, the Magistrate has rightly taken cognizance and summoned the applicant to face the trial in respect of the offences complained of against him. [Vijay Kumar Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand, Criminal Misc. Application No. (C-482) No. 1087 of 2016, decided on 18-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J., addressed an application that sought to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 468, 471 of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[22274,32378,3067,33586,2835,2554,13021,39028,14611,39029],"class_list":["post-223641","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-abuse-of-process-of-law","tag-cheating","tag-FIR","tag-forgery","tag-inherent_power","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-section-66-d-of-information-technology-act","tag-trust","tag-unknown-hacker"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J., addressed an application that sought to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 468, 471 of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-27T07:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/\",\"name\":\"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-27T07:00:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution","og_description":"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J., addressed an application that sought to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 468, 471 of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-27T07:00:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/uttrakhandHC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/","name":"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-27T07:00:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/27\/utt-hc-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-should-not-be-exercised-to-stifle-or-scuttle-the-legitimate-prosecution\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Utt HC | Jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC should not be exercised to stifle or scuttle the legitimate prosecution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":259990,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/13\/false-promise-to-marry\/","url_meta":{"origin":223641,"position":0},"title":"False promise of marriage to satisfy lust, leading to offence of cheating and rape?: Bom HC refuses to quash FIR for offences under Ss. 376, 417 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of A.S. Chandurkar and G.A. Sanap, JJ.,\u00a0 refused to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC for quashing an FIR in offences of cheating and rape in the matter wherein the applicant\/accused committed sexual intercourse with the girl against her will in the pretext of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6609,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/14\/cancellation-of-marriage-after-having-physical-intercourse-does-not-attract-the-charge-of-rape-when-the-man-has-every-intention-to-fulfill-the-promise-of-marriage\/","url_meta":{"origin":223641,"position":1},"title":"Cancellation of marriage after having physical intercourse does not attract the charge of rape when the man has every intention to fulfill the promise of marriage","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 14, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: In a yet another case where complaint has been lodged against a man for rape and cheating after gaining confidence of the complainant by giving false promise of marriage, a division bench of Ranjit More and Anuja Prabhudessai JJ., exercised the powers under Section 482 of CrPC\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/25\/high-court-does-not-function-as-court-of-appeal-or-revision-while-exercising-jurisdiction-u-s-482-crpc-utthc\/","url_meta":{"origin":223641,"position":2},"title":"High Court does not function as a Court of Appeal or Revision while exercising jurisdiction u\/s 482 of CrPC: Uttaranchal High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 25, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court opined that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of CrPC though wide should not be capriciously or arbitrarily exercised but should be exercised in appropriate cases to do real and substantial justice. Thus, quashing of charge sheet or setting aside summoning order on appreciation of evidence is not justified.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Uttaranchal High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/blog.psd-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/blog.psd-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/blog.psd-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/blog.psd-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":376108,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/19\/bom-hc-retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction-protection\/","url_meta":{"origin":223641,"position":3},"title":"Sanction under S. 19 Prevention of Corruption Act not required after retirement of public servant: Bombay High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"February 19, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe offences alleged to have been committed by the applicant under the IPC cannot be regarded as acts done or purported to be done in furtherance of his official duties.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Retired public servant cannot claim sanction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Retired-public-servant-cannot-claim-sanction.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":239695,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/26\/all-hc-while-exercising-inherent-jurisdiction-under-s-482-crpc-can-high-court-make-any-comment-on-factual-matrix-of-the-case-court-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":223641,"position":4},"title":"All HC | While exercising inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 CrPC, can High Court make any comment on factual matrix of the case? Court answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 26, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court:\u00a0Ram Krishna Gautam, J., held that as per Section 482 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, while exercising the inherent jurisdiction, High Court cannot make any comment on the factual matrix as the same remains under the trial court's domain. The instant application was filed under Section 482 Criminal Procedure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":108711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/23\/io-lacking-territorial-jurisdiction-is-no-ground-to-interfere-in-investigation-under-section-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":223641,"position":5},"title":"IO lacking territorial jurisdiction is no ground to interfere in investigation under Section 482 CrPC","author":"Saba","date":"February 23, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0The applicant approached the Court under Section 482 CrPc to quash and set aside the FIR vide Crime No. 338 of 2015, registered at Cantonment Police Station, Aurangabad under Sections 498-A and 323, 504 and 506 r\/w Section 34 IPC. The complainant in her FIR lodged at the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223641","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223641"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223641\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223641"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223641"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223641"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}