{"id":223620,"date":"2019-12-26T15:30:58","date_gmt":"2019-12-26T10:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=223620"},"modified":"2020-01-02T12:44:23","modified_gmt":"2020-01-02T07:14:23","slug":"raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed this Writ Petition by the petitioners for restraining the respondents to terminate their services that was on a contract basis for a very long time.<\/p>\n

On 03-09-2015, the petitioner applied for a post under the Deendayal Antyodaya Yojna (\u2018DAY-NULM\u2019). The above mentioned got restructured in 2014-15 and was renamed too. The posts were for a contractual basis. One T&M Services Consulting Private Limited was engaged by the respondents for manning various posts including post of Manager etc. Now, in 2019 the respondents are terminating the office of their present employees and replacing them with a new set of contractual based employees.<\/p>\n

On 03-09-2015, the petitioner applied for the post and got selected for a period of 1 year from the date of selection. Though his tenure got extended time and again. Now, again on 08-03-2019, the respondents issued notices for inviting bids for shortlisting of HR Agencies as a service provider for implementation of the DAY-NULM scheme.<\/p>\n

It was submitted the engagement of placement agencies by the respondents is not justified. Mere engagement does not justify anything. The reliance was put on Supreme Court judgment in Mohd. Abdul Kadir v. DGP, <\/em>(2009) 6 SCC 611<\/a>. <\/em>It was held by the Supreme Court that the persons that are appointed on a contractual basis, even if their service is extended for decades on the same contractual job, such a person cannot claim regularization. The service of such a person comes to an end as when the scheme or project is completed.<\/p>\n

The Court held, merely because the respondents issued a notice for inviting bids for shortlisting of HR agencies does not give any cause of action to the petitioner for this petition. Except for the challenge made on the notice, which is supported by Mohd. Abdul Kadir case<\/em>, the petitioner does not have the right to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the Court dismissed this writ petition.[Om Prakash Vyas v. State of Rajasthan, 2019 SCC OnLine Raj 4884<\/b><\/a>, decided on 03-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed this Writ Petition by the petitioners for restraining the respondents to terminate their services that <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30973,36066,39021,13551],"class_list":["post-223620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bids","tag-contractual-basis","tag-regularisation-of-employment","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed this Writ Petition by the petitioners for restraining the respondents to terminate their services that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-26T10:00:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-01-02T07:14:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-26T10:00:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-01-02T07:14:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed this Writ Petition by the petitioners for restraining the respondents to terminate their services that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-26T10:00:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-01-02T07:14:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/","name":"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-26T10:00:58+00:00","dateModified":"2020-01-02T07:14:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/raj-hc-persons-employed-on-contractual-basis-cannot-claim-regularisation-as-a-matter-of-right-through-a-writ-petition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Persons employed on contractual basis cannot claim regularisation as a matter of right through a writ petition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216721,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/11\/kar-hc-right-to-regularisation-of-person-on-purely-contractual-basis-depends-on-express-or-implied-terms-of-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":223620,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Right to regularisation of person on purely contractual basis depends on express or implied terms of appointment","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: P.B. Bajanthri J., dismissed the petition for regularisation of the service on the ground that statutory rule recognizing such right was not in their favor. A petition was made to quash the endorsement issued to the petitioner and to seek respondent to regularize their services in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":216871,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/15\/hp-hc-plea-of-contractual-appointees-for-regularisation-dismissed-observed-contractual-appointments-may-not-strictly-follow-the-rule-of-reservation\/","url_meta":{"origin":223620,"position":1},"title":"HP HC | Plea of contractual appointees for regularisation dismissed; Observed \u2014 Contractual appointments may not strictly follow the rule of reservation","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 15, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A civil writ petition was entertained by a Division Bench of V. Ramasubramanian, C.J. and Anoop Chitkara, JJ. where the petitioners were engaged on a contractual basis as Trainer in various Industrial training institute and they challenged the cut-off date fixed under notification of the Department\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270344,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/19\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-substitution-of-an-appointment-on-compassionate-grounds-through-contractual-appointment-held-illegal-directions-issued\/","url_meta":{"origin":223620,"position":2},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court | Substitution of an appointment on compassionate grounds through contractual appointment held illegal; directions issued","author":"Editor","date":"July 19, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Ravi Malimath, CJ. and Vishal Mishra, J. allowed a writ petition directing the respondents to pay costs for the delay in compassionate employment. The case of the writ petitioner is that his father, who was working as an Assistant Veterinary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":347372,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/08\/past-contractual-service-pension-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":223620,"position":3},"title":"Can past contractual service count towards pension once an employee is regularised? Supreme Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court directed that the Union of India should notify the appellants about the mode and manner in which they could exercise this option and provide information regarding the amounts that the appellants will need to remit if they choose to opt for pension under the Rules.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"past contractual service pension","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/past-contractual-service-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/past-contractual-service-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/past-contractual-service-pension.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/past-contractual-service-pension.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/20\/ker-hc-contractual-employees-would-have-no-right-to-continuance-or-to-challenge-their-termination-after-the-period-of-contract-is-over\/","url_meta":{"origin":223620,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | Contractual employees would have no right to continuance or to challenge their termination after the period of contract is over","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Anu Sivaraman, J. contemplated a writ petition where the several petitioners worked in different posts in the District Child Protection Units in various districts in the State, they challenged the move to terminate their services in order to induct another set of contract employees. The petitioners contended\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240381,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/09\/raj-hc-appointment-on-contractual-basis-is-subject-to-conditions-of-service-of-contract-court-dismisses-appeal-holding-the-termination-valid\/","url_meta":{"origin":223620,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Appointment on contractual basis is subject to conditions of service of contract; Court dismisses appeal holding the termination valid","author":"Editor","date":"December 9, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J., dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the action of respondents who had terminated his services on the ground that the Administration was not satisfied with his work and the competent authority had approved the termination order. The counsel for the petitioner, R.K.Mathur\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223620\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}