{"id":223616,"date":"2019-12-26T14:30:55","date_gmt":"2019-12-26T09:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=223616"},"modified":"2020-01-03T12:52:23","modified_gmt":"2020-01-03T07:22:23","slug":"hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/","title":{"rendered":"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., dismissed an application which was filed by the petitioners challenging an order dated 10-05-2016 given by the H.P. Administrative Tribunal, Shimla (Tribunal) whereby the T.A. was allowed and the termination against the respondent was quashed and set aside.<\/p>\n

The respondent had been working as daily waged Chowkidar with the petitioners- Corporation and was posted at Sehral Depot of Forest Working Unit Kunihar under Forest Working Division, where theft of 229 of resin filled tins took place on the intervening night of 17th<\/sup> and 18th<\/sup> February, 1997 after which an enquiry was initiated against the respondent. The petitioners-Corporation had issued a show-cause notice to the respondent alleging that he had been willfully absent from duty on the intervening night of 17th<\/sup> and 18th<\/sup> February, 1997 following which the services of the respondent were dispensed. Being aggrieved by the order of termination the respondent had approached the Tribunal who had decided in favor of the respondent and thus the instant writ petition was filed by the petitioner.<\/p>\n

The Court while dismissing the petition held that a person, who was working as a daily wager or on contract basis and if his services have been discontinued or terminated on the basis of any allegation of misconduct etc., the provisions of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 are not applicable to his case, however, even then the principles of natural justice are required to be followed and if an order was passed against a person without affording him an opportunity of hearing, it is in violation of natural justice. In addition, the petition needs to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches because the writ was filed after three years of the order. [H.P. State Forest Development Corporation Ltd. v. Ishwar Dutt, 2019 SCC OnLine HP 2199<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., dismissed an application which was <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[8991,39020,5051,2805,34246],"class_list":["post-223616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal","tag-central-civil-services-conduct-rules","tag-misconduct","tag-natural_justice","tag-opportunity-of-hearing"],"yoast_head":"\nHP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-\u2502passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., dismissed an application which was\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-\u2502passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-26T09:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-01-03T07:22:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/\",\"name\":\"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-26T09:00:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-01-03T07:22:23+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-\u2502passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench of L. Narayana Swamy, CJ and Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J., dismissed an application which was","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-\u2502passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-26T09:00:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-01-03T07:22:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_2.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/","name":"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-26T09:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2020-01-03T07:22:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82passing-an-order-without-giving-the-opportunity-of-hearing-is-a-violation-of-natural-justice-court-dismisses-appeal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"HP HC | Passing an order without giving the opportunity of hearing is a violation of natural justice; Court dismisses appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252118,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/02\/opportunity-of-hearing\/","url_meta":{"origin":223616,"position":0},"title":"Bom HC | Denial of urgent hearing by DRT: Court says opportunity of hearing is integral part of constitutional philosophy well embedded in Arts. 14 and 21","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of Sunil B. Shukre and Anil S. Kilor, JJ., held that mandate of Section 34 leaves a party aggrieved by the action of the Bank taken under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act with only one forum to raise its grievance before it. This\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299001,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/andhra-pradesh-hc-directs-state-to-take-appropriate-steps-to-serve-charge-memo-to-former-forest-range-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":223616,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Quashing of charge memo cannot be in routine manner\u2019; Andhra Pradesh HC directs State to take appropriate steps to serve charge memo to Former Forest Range Officer","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is the basic duty and responsibility of the respondent to protect the environment of the forest by complying with the G.O.Ms.No.91, Environment Forests Science and Technology (FOR.III) Department and by submitting the complete report as it is on his recommendation that the shifting is permitted.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309594,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/termination-without-opportunity-of-being-heard-violates-article-3112-mandate-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":223616,"position":2},"title":"Termination without opportunity of being heard violates Article 311(2) mandate: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court determined that the termination, despite being framed as simpliciter, was based on respondent\u2019s alleged misconduct.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/08\/utt-hc-fundamental-rule-of-law-is-that-no-decision-can-be-given-without-the-opportunity-of-being-heard-court-allows-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":223616,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Fundamental rule of law is that no decision can be given without the opportunity of being heard; Court allows appeal","author":"Editor","date":"October 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Lok Pal Singh, J., allowed a writ petition which was filed in the nature of the certiorari, seeking quashing of the order passed by the Uttarakhand Technical Education Board (Respondent 3) and subsequent order by the Additional Director of Education. An advertisement was issued by Respondent 3\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217248,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/kar-hc-petitioner-failed-to-avail-opportunity-of-personal-hearing-under-s-122-a-of-customs-act-granted-liberty-to-avail-statutory-remedy-under-the-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":223616,"position":4},"title":"Kar HC | Petitioner failed to avail opportunity of personal hearing under S. 122-A of Customs Act, granted liberty to avail statutory remedy under the Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: S. Sujatha, J. while disposing of this writ petition gave liberty to the petitioners to avail statutory remedy available under the Customs Act, 1962. In the instant case, the petitioners had challenged the order of the respondent, Joint Commissioner of Customs, Kempe Gowda International Airport as no\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":304262,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/10\/dhc-directs-aiims-to-pay-wages-dearness-allowance-to-staff-nurses-working-on-contractual-basis-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":223616,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Staff nurses working on contract basis cannot be denied adequate compensation as is being received by regular staff\u2019: Delhi High Court directs AIIMS to pay wages along with dearness allowance","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNurses working in hospitals provide a very valuable humanitarian service. It will be a travesty of justice if such people are denied adequate compensation for their services as they were entitled to.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223616"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223616\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}