{"id":223608,"date":"2019-12-26T09:30:02","date_gmt":"2019-12-26T04:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=223608"},"modified":"2019-12-30T13:13:55","modified_gmt":"2019-12-30T07:43:55","slug":"gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/","title":{"rendered":"Gau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where ‘reverse burden’ wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated"},"content":{"rendered":"

Gauhati High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>A Division Bench of Mir Alfaz Ali and Nani Tagia, JJ., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC.<\/p>\n

The appellant was alleged to have murdered his son after a quarrel took place between the two. Apparently, there was no direct evidence against the appellant and his conviction was based on circumstantial evidence. The trial court held that the deceased was found dead in the house of the appellant and the appellant did not offer any explanation as to how the death of the deceased was caused. Thus, basically relying on the said circumstance, the conviction of the appellant was recorded putting a reverse burden on the appellant under Section 106\u00a0(burden of proving fact especially\u00a0within knowledge)\u00a0<\/em>of the Evidence Act. Aggrieved by the order of the trial court, the appellant filed the instant appeal.<\/p>\n

While perusing the record, the High Court noted that evidently, the body of the deceased was found in the rented house of the tenant of the appellant. Also, when the dead body was recovered and people came to the place of occurrence, the appellant was found in his own house in an inebriated condition. When the police came, then only, he came out on being called by the police. The trial court observed that the appellant was found inside the house where the occurrence took place, but, there was no evidence on record to support such observation, and as such, this finding of the trial court appear to be perverse.<\/p>\n

Regarding the law on Section 106, the High Court observed:<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

“In a criminal trial burden is always on the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt and Section 106 of the Evidence Act is not intended to relieve the prosecution of its burden. Only when prosecution proves certain fact from which reasonable inference can be drawn regarding certain other facts, which unless explained by the accused by virtue of his special knowledge, tend to inculpate\u00a0the accused, in such circumstance the accused owe an explanation, otherwise section 106 of the Evidence Act does not put any burden on the accused to prove his innocence.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Referring to the facts of the instant case, the Court held:<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

“In the present case evidently prosecution has not been able to prove any fact, from which an adverse inference could be drawn to attribute culpability to the appellant, in absence of any explanation. As already indicated above, the findings of the learned trial court, that the deceased was found with the appellant in his house was perverse. Once, these findings <\/strong>are discarded, there are no other materials on record to attribute any special knowledge to the appellant in respect of the death of the deceased.”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Accordingly, the appeal was allowed and the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant was set aside. [Tunu Urang v. State of Assam, 2019 SCC OnLine Gau 5528<\/b><\/a>, decided on 19-12-2019]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Gauhati High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Mir Alfaz Ali and Nani Tagia, JJ., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,2948,39010,30765,2519],"class_list":["post-223608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-murder","tag-section-106-of-evidence-act","tag-section-302-ipc","tag-Sentence"],"yoast_head":"\nGau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where 'reverse burden' wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where 'reverse burden' wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Mir Alfaz Ali and Nani Tagia, JJ., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-26T04:00:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-12-30T07:43:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/\",\"name\":\"Gau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where 'reverse burden' wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-26T04:00:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-30T07:43:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where ‘reverse burden’ wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where 'reverse burden' wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where 'reverse burden' wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated","og_description":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of Mir Alfaz Ali and Nani Tagia, JJ., allowed an appeal filed against the order of the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-26T04:00:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-12-30T07:43:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Gauhati-HC.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/","name":"Gau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where 'reverse burden' wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-26T04:00:02+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-30T07:43:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/26\/gau-hc-conviction-for-murder-set-aside-where-reverse-burden-wrongly-shifted-on-accused-to-prove-innocence-law-regarding-s-106-evidence-act-restated\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gau HC | Conviction for murder set aside where ‘reverse burden’ wrongly shifted on accused to prove innocence, law regarding S. 106 Evidence Act restated"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/22\/section-106-evidence-act-not-a-substitute-for-the-burden-of-proof-which-rests-on-prosecution-murder-accused-acquitted-holding-prosecution-case-based-on-presumption-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":223608,"position":0},"title":"Section 106 Evidence Act not a substitute for the burden of proof which rests on prosecution; murder accused acquitted holding prosecution case based on presumption: Bombay HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 22, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S.S. Shinde and A.S. Gadkari, JJ., allowed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for murder under Section 302 IPC. The appellant and the deceased were living in a live-in-relationship. Both were married\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":201523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/07\/conviction-under-section-302-ipc-upheld-in-light-of-direct-evidence-of-12-year-old-daughter-of-convict\/","url_meta":{"origin":223608,"position":1},"title":"Conviction under Section 302 IPC\u00a0upheld in light of direct evidence of 12 year old daughter of convict","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and V. Kameswar Rao, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was charged for murdering his wife by stabbing her with a knife. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":272355,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/26\/orissa-high-court-upholds-conviction-murder-deceased-rigorous-imprisonment-circumstantial-evidence-witness-relation-with-deceased-testimony-discarded-legalnews-legalupdates-legalresearch\/","url_meta":{"origin":223608,"position":2},"title":"Orissa High Court | Witnesses related to the deceased would not result in their testimonies being discarded if otherwise truthful and consistent","author":"Editor","date":"August 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Orissa High Court: In an appeal filed challenging the Trial court ruling, convicting the accused under Section 302 of Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') a Division Bench of S Muralidhar CJ., and R K Pattanaik J. upheld conviction under Section 302 IPC by examining circumstantial evidence in detail and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/orissa_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203023,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/03\/abstaining-from-funeral-of-father-contrary-to-normal-human-conduct-to-be-considered-incriminating-factor-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":223608,"position":3},"title":"Abstaining from funeral of father contrary to normal human conduct, to be considered incriminating factor: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of Ranjan Gogoi, Navin Sinha and K.M. Joseph, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of Bombay High Court whereby the appellant\u2019s conviction under Section 302 IPC was upheld. The appellant was convicted for the murder of his father. The occurrence was stated to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200361,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/20\/accused-convicted-under-section-302-ipc-in-light-of-no-alternative-theory\/","url_meta":{"origin":223608,"position":4},"title":"Accused convicted under Section 302 IPC in light of \u2018no alternative theory\u2019","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of S. Muralidhar and Vinod Goel, JJ. dismissed a criminal appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC. The appellant was alleged to have murdered his wife. It was proved that the deceased\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224364,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/22\/bom-hc-murder-convict-set-free-where-dying-declaration-had-deceaseds-thumb-impression-with-clear-ridges-despite-100-percent-burn-injuries\/","url_meta":{"origin":223608,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | Murder convict set free where dying declaration had deceased’s thumb impression with clear ridges despite 100 percent burn injuries","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 22, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Division Bench of P.N. Deshmukh and Pushpa V. Ganediwala, JJ., allowed a criminal appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for committing the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC and for the offence of cruelty to women\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}