{"id":223052,"date":"2019-12-10T09:30:46","date_gmt":"2019-12-10T04:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=223052"},"modified":"2019-12-12T14:19:53","modified_gmt":"2019-12-12T08:49:53","slug":"sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/","title":{"rendered":"Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Sikkim High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J., while exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC quashed the criminal complaint filed against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 405, 420 and 441 read with Section 120-B IPC. Warrants issued against the petitioners by the Magistrate in the same case were also quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The parties were involved in a landlord-tenant dispute, pursuant to which the said complaint was filed by the landlord. Magistrate took cognizance and issued process against the petitioners. Aggrieved, they filed the instant petition. It was an admitted fact that the petitioners resided beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the Magistrate concerned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dismissing Chapter 15 of CrPC which deals with complaints to Magistrates, the High Court relied on\u00a0<em>Birla Corpn. Ltd. v. Adventz Investments &amp; Holdings Ltd.,\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/w6VoWU5h\">2019 SCC OnLine SC 682<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court held that under the amended sub-section (1) to Section 202 CrPC, it is obligatory upon the Magistrate that before summoning the accused residing beyond its jurisdiction. he shall inquire into the case himself or direct the investigation to be made by a police officer or by such other person as he thinks fir for finding out whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused. The Supreme Court also held that the order of the Magistrate must reflect that he has applied his mind to the facts of the case and the law applicable thereto. It was also held that the application of mind has to be indicated by disclosure of mind on the satisfaction and considering the duties of the magistrates for issuance of summons to accused in a complaint case, there must be sufficient indication of it. The Supreme Court after referring to a catena of its previous judgments held that summons may be issued if the allegations in the complaint, the complainant statement and other materials would show that there are sufficient grounds for proceeding against the accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The records of the instant matter, however, did not reveal that the Magistrate had complied with the provisions of Section 202 CrPC and applied her mind to the facts of the case and the law applicable thereto. The order of taking cognizance stated that\u00a0<em>&#8220;cognizance of the matter is taken against accused no. 1, 2, 3 and 4&#8221;.\u00a0<\/em>Section 190 CrPC deals with cognizance of offence by Magistrate, which provides that the Magistrate\u00a0<em>&#8220;may take cognizance of any offence.&#8221;\u00a0<\/em>It is settled law that cognizance is taken of the offence and not the offender. The Magistrate did not even mention which of the offences she had taken cognizance of.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was, thus, held that the Magistrate failed to exercise her discretion to issue summons against the petitioners residing beyond her territorial jurisdiction in the manner required. Even otherwise, considering the allegations, it was found that there was no material before the Court to proceed under criminal jurisdiction. [Mohd. Yusufuddin Ahmed v. Ruth Karthak Lepchani,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/f14Bu71r\"> <b>2019 SCC OnLine Sikk 198<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sikkim High Court:\u00a0Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J., while exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC quashed the criminal complaint filed against the petitioners <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[13421,13031,38758,2538,31605,12161,38757],"class_list":["post-223052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-criminal-complaint","tag-inherent-powers","tag-landlord-tenant-dispute","tag-Magistrate","tag-summon","tag-territorial-jurisdiction","tag-warrants"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sikkim High Court:\u00a0Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J., while exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC quashed the criminal complaint filed against the petitioners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-10T04:00:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-12-12T08:49:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/\",\"name\":\"Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-10T04:00:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-12T08:49:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction","og_description":"Sikkim High Court:\u00a0Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J., while exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC quashed the criminal complaint filed against the petitioners","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-10T04:00:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-12-12T08:49:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/","name":"Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-10T04:00:46+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-12T08:49:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/10\/sikkim-hc-a-magistrate-is-obligated-to-inquire-into-the-case-for-finding-sufficient-grounds-before-summoning-accused-beyond-his-territorial-jurisdiction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sikkim HC | A Magistrate is obligated to inquire into the case for finding sufficient grounds before summoning accused beyond his territorial jurisdiction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6620,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/05\/12\/case-against-aamir-khan-for-killing-chinkara-animal-during-the-shooting-of-lagaan-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":223052,"position":0},"title":"Case against Aamir Khan for killing Chinkara animal during the shooting of \u2018Lagaan\u2019 quashed","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 12, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Gujarat High Court: In a major relief to actor Amir Khan and four others in a criminal case involving the killing of Chinkara during the shooting of the film \u2018Lagaan\u2019 in 2000, a bench of V.M. Sahai, ACJ., quashed the case of criminal complaint as well as the bailable warrants\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":325301,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/28\/jharkhand-hc-quashes-criminal-proceedings-against-century-cement\/","url_meta":{"origin":223052,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Typical example of frivolous litigants abusing the Court process\u2019; Jharkhand HC quashes criminal proceedings against Century Cement","author":"Arushi","date":"June 28, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that when the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was already filed by the petitioners, Respondent 2 had all the opportunity to defend in that pending complaint case, and without doing so, present complaint case was filed implicating the petitioners.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238146,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/29\/malafide-litigation-madras-hc-proceedings-under-s-420-ipc-quashed-for-being-counterblast-to-complaint-instituted-under-s-138-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":223052,"position":2},"title":"[Malafide Litigation] Madras HC | Proceedings under S. 420 IPC quashed for being counterblast to complaint instituted under S. 138 NI Act","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 29, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J., allowed a criminal original petition and quashed the proceedings in a criminal case filed against the petitioner. Instant petition was filed to quash the proceedings pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate having been taken cognizance for the offences under Section 420 of Penal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":313475,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/09\/cal-hc-sets-aside-issuance-of-process-remands-matter-for-compliance-with-section-202-of-crpc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":223052,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court sets aside Issuance of Process; remands matter to Magistrate for compliance with Section 202 of CrPC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Whether the process issued against the petitioner by the Magistrate was valid considering the petitioner\u2019s residence outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Magistrate?","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/02\/criminal-proceedings-cannot-be-permitted-to-degenerate-into-weapon-of-harassment-hcs-must-quash-frivolous-firs-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":223052,"position":4},"title":"Criminal proceedings cannot be permitted to degenerate into weapon of harassment; HCs must quash frivolous FIRs: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 2, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and\/or under Article 226 of the Constitution is designed to achieve salutary purpose that criminal proceedings ought not to be permitted to degenerate into weapon of harassment.\"","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313213,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/06\/cal-hc-sets-aside-magistrates-orders-emphasises-mandatory-compliance-with-section-202-of-crpc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":223052,"position":5},"title":"Securities Misappropriation | Calcutta High Court sets aside Magistrate\u2019s orders on non-compliance of mandatory provision of Section 202 CrPC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe compliance of provision under Section 202 of the CrPC, 1973, is compulsory and unavoidable for a Magistrate before issuance of summons in case of alleged offender who resides outside his territorial jurisdiction.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223052\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}