{"id":222909,"date":"2019-12-06T14:30:46","date_gmt":"2019-12-06T09:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222909"},"modified":"2019-12-12T14:32:38","modified_gmt":"2019-12-12T09:02:38","slug":"raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the &#8220;principal of parity&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Rajasthan High Court: <\/b>Sandeep Mehta, J. suspended the punishment awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge in the Sessions Case No. 46 of 2017, Udaipur. The co-accused of the same case already got relief from this Court.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appellant, in this case, is convicted and sentenced for offences under Sections 307, 323\/34 and 324\/34 of the Penal Code. The applicant in the appeal has already served nearly four and a half years of punishment out of seven years of rigorous punishment awarded by the trial court. Whereas the Court already suspended the sentence awarded to the co-accused. Before giving any relief to the appellant, the Court looked into the previous convictions of the appellant. It was collected that the appellant did not have any other grievous criminal history, except for the present one. Hence, the Court decided that the applicant will be granted bail during the pendency of the appeal, following the principle of parity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Section 389 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides for the provision of bail in certain cases and this Court suspended the sentence of the trial court till the final disposal of this appeal.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court asked the appellant to produce a personal bond of a sum of Rs 50,000 with two sureties of Rs 25,000 each. In addition, the Court ordered for his appearance in this court on 06-01-2020. The Court also ordered that the appellant will have to appear before the trial court in the month of January, of every year, until the appeal is decided. The appellant is also supposed to inform the trial court if he changes his place of residence or the sureties residence. The Court ordered the trial court to maintain attendance of the accused- applicant in a separate file. Further, this Court ordered the trial court to inform if the applicant does not produce himself. If so, then the High Court will cancel the bail of the applicant. [Mustaffa Sheik v. State of Rajasthan, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/QLsB6VZO\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Raj 4477<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: Sandeep Mehta, J. suspended the punishment awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge in the Sessions Case No. 46 of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,38714,2769,38715],"class_list":["post-222909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-principal-of-parity","tag-relief","tag-section-389-of-crpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the &quot;principal of parity&quot; | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the &quot;principal of parity&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Sandeep Mehta, J. suspended the punishment awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge in the Sessions Case No. 46 of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-06T09:00:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-12-12T09:02:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the \\\"principal of parity\\\" | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-06T09:00:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-12T09:02:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the &#8220;principal of parity&#8221;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the \"principal of parity\" | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the \"principal of parity\"","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: Sandeep Mehta, J. suspended the punishment awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge in the Sessions Case No. 46 of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-06T09:00:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-12-12T09:02:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/","name":"Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the \"principal of parity\" | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-06T09:00:46+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-12T09:02:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/06\/raj-hc-application-under-s-389-crpc-allowed-following-the-principal-of-parity\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Application under S. 389 CrPC allowed following the &#8220;principal of parity&#8221;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223117,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/11\/jhar-hc-accused-serving-sentence-in-a-non-bailable-offence-directed-to-be-released-on-bail-principle-of-parity-applied\/","url_meta":{"origin":222909,"position":0},"title":"Jhar HC | Accused serving sentence in a non-bailable offence directed to be released on bail; Principle of parity applied","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J. allowed the interim application of the appellant by granting bail on the basis that the co-accused in similar cases have already been granted bail.\u00a0 Firstly, the appellant, in this case, has been charged with Dacoity, punishable under Section 395 of the Penal Code.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":177724,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/12\/22\/mp-high-court-decides-not-opt-reformative-methods-brutal-murder-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":222909,"position":1},"title":"MP High Court decides not to opt for reformative methods in a brutal murder case","author":"Saba","date":"December 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur: The High Court recently dealt with a criminal appeal preferred by the accused being aggrieved by the judgment of Addl. Sessions Judge of convicting him under Ss. 302 (three counts), 201 and 506 Part-II, IPC. Also, the trial court had made reference to this Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/24\/uttaranchal-hc-vaccinologist-conviction-stayed-citing-public-health-national-interest\/","url_meta":{"origin":222909,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Vaccine development is issue of public health and national interest\u2019: Uttaranchal HC stays Vaccinologist&#8217;s conviction under Section 306 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"July 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cUnless the attention of the court is drawn to the specific consequences that would follow on account of the conviction, the person convicted cannot obtain an order of stay of conviction.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Vaccinologist conviction stayed","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vaccinologist-conviction-stayed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vaccinologist-conviction-stayed.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vaccinologist-conviction-stayed.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Vaccinologist-conviction-stayed.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":381342,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/17\/ex-jharkhand-minister-disproportionate-assets-case-anosh-ekka-sc-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":222909,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court Grants Bail to Anosh Ekka in Disproportionate Assets Case; Cites Overlapping of Allegations","author":"Malika Bhola","date":"April 17, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Split charge-sheets from same FIR and prior suspension in connected case weigh with Court; issue of parallel prosecutions left open","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Ex- Jharkhand minister disproportionate assets case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ex-Jharkhand-minister-disproportionate-assets-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ex-Jharkhand-minister-disproportionate-assets-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ex-Jharkhand-minister-disproportionate-assets-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Ex-Jharkhand-minister-disproportionate-assets-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":199617,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/04\/husband-acquitted-of-charges-under-section-498-a-ipc-on-grounds-of-parity-with-co-accused\/","url_meta":{"origin":222909,"position":4},"title":"Husband acquitted of charges under Section 498-A IPC on grounds of parity with co-accused","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 4, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Manish Pitale, J., acquitted the appellant-husband who was convicted by the trial court Section 498-A and other sections of IPC. The appellant was married to the deceased and within one year of marriage she set herself on fire and committed suicide.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311830,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/20\/stray-puppies-death-sentence-quantum-victim-right-to-appeal-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222909,"position":5},"title":"[8 Stray Puppies\u2019 Death] S. 372, CrPC does not give victim a right to appeal to challenge the quantum of punishment: Karnataka HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In this case the complainant had challenged the \u201cflea bite sentence\u201d passed by the Trial Court against the accused who had pleaded guilty of causing death of 8 stray puppies.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}