{"id":222858,"date":"2019-12-05T14:15:36","date_gmt":"2019-12-05T08:45:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222858"},"modified":"2019-12-09T16:47:57","modified_gmt":"2019-12-09T11:17:57","slug":"jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of Ali Mohammad Magrey and Dhiraj Singh Thakur, JJ. disposed of the appeal after asking the Writ Court to hear the parties and decide the writ petition on merits, expeditiously.<\/p>\n

An appeal was filed by the appellant (who is the respondent 7 in the connected writ petition), against the order dated 23-10-2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in the contempt petition arising out of Other Writ Petition (OWP) filed by the respondent’s 8 to 11.<\/p>\n

The appellant stated that the respondents 8 to 11 had filed an OWP, wherein the learned Single Judge, in terms of order dated 10-01-2019, while issuing notice to the respondents, observed that pendency of the writ petition shall not come in the way of the official respondents in making further follow up under law in pursuance to NIT No. 64\/02\/EEP\/R&B\/2018-19 dated 27th of June, 2018. Thereafter, alleging non-compliance of the aforesaid order passed by the learned single Judge, the writ petitioners\/ respondents 8 to 11 filed a contempt petition, wherein the learned single Judge, in terms of order dated 23-10-2019, i.e., directed that the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Pulwama, was to take immediate steps to provide security to the Executing Agency so that the execution work undertaken by the Executive Engineer, R&B, Division Pulwama, with respect to pathway in question went unhindered.<\/p>\n

The appellant submitted that the contempt petition had arisen out of the ad-interim <\/em>order passed in writ petition filed by the respondents 8 to 11 wherein the learned Single Judge has only made observation that pendency of the writ petition shall not come in the way of the official respondents in making further follow up under law, however, the learned Single Judge had gone beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction by issuing further directions for providing security to the Executing Agency.<\/p>\n

The Court found force in the submissions of the appellant and, therefore, ordered that the impugned order was set aside; since the consideration in the contempt petition was deferred. Accordingly, the appeal was disposed of along with the connected petitions. [Ghulam Hassan Rather v. UTof J&K, 2019 SCC OnLine J&K 913<\/b><\/a>, decided on 02-12-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench of Ali Mohammad Magrey and Dhiraj Singh Thakur, JJ. disposed of the appeal after <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37573,38684,30393,38685,32552],"class_list":["post-222858","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-ad-interim-order","tag-contempt-jursdiction","tag-contempt-petition","tag-executing-agency","tag-writ-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench of Ali Mohammad Magrey and Dhiraj Singh Thakur, JJ. disposed of the appeal after\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-05T08:45:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-12-09T11:17:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-05T08:45:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-09T11:17:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature","og_description":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Division Bench of Ali Mohammad Magrey and Dhiraj Singh Thakur, JJ. disposed of the appeal after","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-05T08:45:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-12-09T11:17:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/","name":"J&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-05T08:45:36+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-09T11:17:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/jk-hc-order-found-to-be-beyond-the-scope-of-contempt-jurisdiction-when-contempt-petition-had-arisen-out-of-an-ad-interim-order-which-was-observatory-in-nature\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K HC | Order found to be beyond the scope of contempt jurisdiction when contempt petition had arisen out of an ad-interim order which was observatory in nature"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":235383,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/05\/madras-hc-does-doctrine-of-merger-makes-a-distinction-between-an-order-of-reversal-modification-or-an-order-of-confirmation-hc-explains-in-a-contempt-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":222858,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | Does doctrine of merger make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation? HC explains in a Contempt Petition","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0N. Anand Venkatesh, J., while addressing the contempt petition held that, \"The doctrine of merger does not make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation.\" Petitioners Counsel, N.G.R Prasad and Sathish Parasaran, Senior Counsel on behalf of the respondent, represented the parties\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/11\/jk-hc-stay-application-rejected-considering-that-applicant-already-filed-independent-motion-in-contempt-petition-for-deferment-of-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":222858,"position":1},"title":"J&K HC | Stay application rejected considering that applicant already filed independent motion in contempt petition for deferment of\u00a0 proceedings","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 11, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Bench of Tashi Rabstan, J., dismissed the application filed for seeking stay of contempt proceedings pending in the contempt petition on the ground that the applicants\/respondents had already filed a review petition for review of judgment\/order, implementation of which was sought by the writ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":285234,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/25\/rss-route-march-madras-high-court-single-judge-cannot-modify-order-passed-in-writ-petition-while-exercising-jurisdiction-to-punish-respondents-under-a-contempt-petition-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":222858,"position":2},"title":"[RSS Route-March] Madras High Court: Single Judge cannot modify order passed in writ petition, while exercising jurisdiction under a contempt petition","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court held that that the order passed in writ petition had been fundamentally modified by the order passed in the contempt petition, the effect of which resulted in a veiled attempt to sit in judgment\/appeal over the order passed in the writ petition, which is not permissible in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-455.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":359274,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/06\/supreme-court-reinstatement-of-rajasthan-pradhan-suspension\/","url_meta":{"origin":222858,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court deprecates State Inaction; Orders immediate restoration of suspended Rajasthan Pradhan","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the normal course, we would not have entertained the petition of this nature, but the petitioner is seeking implementation of a relief that he has already got by invoking a remedy under Article 226\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Reinstatement of Rajasthan Pradhan","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reinstatement-of-Rajasthan-Pradhan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reinstatement-of-Rajasthan-Pradhan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reinstatement-of-Rajasthan-Pradhan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Reinstatement-of-Rajasthan-Pradhan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/12\/delhi-hc-directs-elderly-man-spend-day-court-punishment-for-conempt-of-courts-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222858,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Elderly Man to Spend Day in Court as Punishment for Contempt over Property Price Manipulation","author":"Editor","date":"July 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The contemnor used the filing of the writ petition as another weapon in his armour to try and get the price reduced for the land. Such conduct of any person to abuse the judicial process cannot be ignored or left unpunished.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":212531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/28\/ker-hc-review-against-petition-pertaining-to-rights-of-forest-dwellers-maintainable-where-petition-disposed-of-without-considering-all-prayers\/","url_meta":{"origin":222858,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | Review against petition pertaining to rights of forest dwellers maintainable where petition disposed of without considering all prayers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 28, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: The Division Bench of Hrishikesh Roy, CJ and A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. allowed withdrawal of a writ appeal opining that since the same pertained to rights of forest dwellers, the proper course would be a review against the writ petition which was disposed of hastily. The present\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222858","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222858"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222858\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222858"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222858"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222858"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}