{"id":222782,"date":"2019-12-03T15:45:17","date_gmt":"2019-12-03T10:15:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222782"},"modified":"2019-12-05T12:30:29","modified_gmt":"2019-12-05T07:00:29","slug":"raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Goverdhan Bardhar, JJ. dismissed this appeal and upheld the judgment of learned single judge of High Court. Appeal was filed where the appellant was ordered to pay an amount of Rs 5 crore to the respondent as charges for conversion of land use.<\/p>\n

The appellant purchased the land in dispute by sale deed from Assam Ram Flour Mills. That land was earlier used for industrial purpose but on an application filed by Assam Flour Mills, an order was passed by District Collector under Rule 14(1) of Rajasthan Industrial Areas Allotment Rules, 1959 changing the use of land from industrial to agricultural on certain conditions, one of which was that a company in order to make use of same land for non-agricultural purpose would require permission from local body, and would also need to deposit conversion charges for the same. Accordingly, the appellant-company filed an application with the respondent authority requesting for the conversion of land use from industrial to agricultural. An application was also filed by the appellant-company for mutation of the said land in its name, but simultaneously a lease deed was executed in its name. The objection was raised by the audit department for not charging the required conversion charges.<\/p>\n

The appellants represented by R.K. Agarwal, Sunita Pareek and Adhiraj Modi, argued that Assam Rolling Flour Mills applied for conversion of land from industrial to agricultural The appellant had no role to play in the conversion of land use. Thus, asking the appellant to pay such a huge amount after ten years all of a sudden was illegal and arbitrary.<\/p>\n

The respondent, Jaipur Development Authority, represented by Amit Kuri and Saloni Khatri, had submitted an undertaking and was fully aware of the requirement of payment of charges for conversion of land use.<\/p>\n

The Court relied on the reasoning of Single Judge of High Court and said an examination of all the contentious issues was done before learned Single Judge. The total amount which is demanded by JDA with interest exceeds Rs 20 crores so only asking for 5 crores deposit to JDA is reasonable. Even respondent JDA was also liable to refund the aforesaid amount which was asked in excess.<\/p>\n

The Court did not find any merit in the appeal and going through facts and circumstances of the case directed the writ petition to be listed at hearing from the admission stage before Single Judge Bench on 20-01-2020. [Sun City Project Pvt. Ltd. v. Jaipur Development Authority, 2019 SCC OnLine Raj 3962<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Goverdhan Bardhar, JJ. dismissed this appeal and upheld the judgment of learned <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38638,38639],"class_list":["post-222782","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appeal-against-interim-order","tag-conversion-of-land-use"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Goverdhan Bardhar, JJ. dismissed this appeal and upheld the judgment of learned\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-03T10:15:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-12-05T07:00:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-03T10:15:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-05T07:00:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":448,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"Appeal against interim order\",\"conversion of land use\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-03T10:15:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-05T07:00:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/03\\\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/04\\\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Mohammad Rafiq and Goverdhan Bardhar, JJ. dismissed this appeal and upheld the judgment of learned","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-03T10:15:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-12-05T07:00:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues","datePublished":"2019-12-03T10:15:17+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-05T07:00:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/"},"wordCount":448,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["Appeal against interim order","conversion of land use"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/","name":"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-12-03T10:15:17+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-05T07:00:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/03\/raj-hc-appeal-against-interim-order-directing-charges-to-be-paid-for-conversion-of-land-use-dismissed-where-single-judge-already-examined-all-contentious-issues\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Appeal against interim order directing charges to be paid for conversion of land use dismissed where Single Judge already examined all contentious issues"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204482,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/29\/incumbent-upon-division-bench-to-record-findings-on-all-issues-carried-in-intra-court-appeal-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222782,"position":0},"title":"Incumbent upon Division Bench to record findings on all issues carried in intra-court appeal: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court:\u00a0A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and Indu Malhotra, JJ. allowed an appeal filed against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court whereby the appellant's special appeal filed against the order of the Single Judge was dismissed. The present matter arose in relation to land\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224811,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/31\/raj-hc-non-prescription-of-limitation-period-in-a-statute-for-making-reference-to-a-court-does-not-confer-unbridled-power-on-authority-to-exercise-the-same-on-whims\/","url_meta":{"origin":222782,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Non-prescription of limitation period in a statute for making reference to a Court, does not confer unbridled power on authority to exercise the same on whims","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Sangeet Lodha and Mahendar Kumar Goyal, JJ. dismissed an appeal regarding irregularity of a suit for declaration of land under Sections 88 and 188 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 belonging to a Scheduled Caste member while also finding no illegality in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217451,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/30\/gau-hc-proof-of-ownership-and-possession-of-land-precondition-for-establishing-charge-of-criminal-trespass\/","url_meta":{"origin":222782,"position":2},"title":"Gau HC | Proof of ownership and possession of land precondition for establishing charge of criminal trespass","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Gauhati High Court:\u00a0Sanjay Kumar Medhi, J. dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate whereby he had acquitted the accused-respondents of the charges under various sections of IPC including Section 447\u00a0(punishment for criminal trespass). The complainant-appellant had alleged that the accused came in a group\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":204770,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/03\/appeal-against-division-of-property-dismissed-on-claimants-failure-to-prove-the-case-court-of-appeal-of-sri-lanka\/","url_meta":{"origin":222782,"position":3},"title":"Appeal against division of property dismissed on claimant\u2019s failure to prove the case:\u00a0 Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka: An appeal was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of M.M.A. Gaffoor, J., against a judgment of district judge where the original plaintiff instituted an action seeking partition of a land. Claim of plaintiff regarding the land was to receive undivided 1\/2 share\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/order-27-rule-5-cpc-mandates-the-court-to-ensure-disputes-concerning-public-undertakings-are-resolved-amicably-arbitrator-appointed-therefor-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222782,"position":4},"title":"Order 27 Rule 5 CPC mandates the Court to ensure disputes concerning public undertakings are resolved amicably; Arbitrator appointed therefor: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of A.M. Sapre and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ. disposed of an appeal filed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court whereby the petition of the appellant was dismissed. The appellant was a Government of India undertaking controlled by the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/08\/sl-coa-right-of-way-by-prescriptive-user-for-using-the-disputed-site-for-past-20-years-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":222782,"position":5},"title":"SL CoA | Right of way by prescriptive user for using the disputed site for past 20 years upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Court of Appeal of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka: The Bench of A.L. Shiran Gooneratne and Mahinda Samayawardhena, JJ., dismissed the appeal in the matter of acquisition of prescriptive right to use by the respondent. In the instant case, the respondent instituted proceedings under Section 66(1)(b) of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222782","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222782"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222782\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222782"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222782"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222782"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}