{"id":222744,"date":"2019-12-02T14:39:44","date_gmt":"2019-12-02T09:09:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222744"},"modified":"2019-12-02T14:39:44","modified_gmt":"2019-12-02T09:09:44","slug":"sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","title":{"rendered":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:\u00a0<\/strong>A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, CJ and Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, and Murdu N.B. Fernando, PC, JJ., allowed appeals filed by two appellants out of eight accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The two Accused-Appellant-Petitioners (hereinafter called Appellants) were charged along with six others in the Magistrate\u2019s Court of Jaffna. They were charged for \u201cJoining an Unlawful Assembly armed with any deadly weapon\u201d, an offence punishable under Section 141 of the Penal Code; \u201cVoluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt by dangerous weapons or means\u201d while being members of an unlawful assembly, an offence punishable under Section 317 read with Section 146 of the Penal Code; and \u201cVoluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt by dangerous weapons or means\u201d punishable under Section 317 read with Section 32 of the Penal Code.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Magistrate convicted all eight accused for the first two counts, after trial. The two appellants being aggrieved with the conviction and the sentence appealed to the High Court of Jaffna.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court Judge affirmed the conviction and sentence. Thus the instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Counsels for the appellants M.A. Sumanthiran, PC, J. Arulanantham and D. Mascarange contended that he would mainly address the issue of dock identification as there was no proper dock identification relating to two appellants and there was no sufficient evidence to establish the identity of the two appellants. There was no dispute that neither the victim nor any other witness, in this case, knew the two appellants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while allowing the appeal opinioned that the evidence was unsatisfactory and the conviction and sentence of the two appellants was set aside accordingly acquitted. [Rathnasingham Janushan v. Officer In-charge, SC (Spl) Appeal No. 07 of 2018, decided on 04-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:\u00a0A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, CJ and Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":147611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[3468,2538,2519,38617],"class_list":["post-222744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-conviction","tag-Magistrate","tag-Sentence","tag-voluntarily-causing-grievous-hurt-by-dangerous-weapons-or-means"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:\u00a0A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, CJ and Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":299,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"conviction\",\"Magistrate\",\"Sentence\",\"Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt by dangerous weapons or means\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Foreign Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/\",\"name\":\"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/12\\\/02\\\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction","og_description":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:\u00a0A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, CJ and Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction","datePublished":"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/"},"wordCount":299,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","keywords":["conviction","Magistrate","Sentence","Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt by dangerous weapons or means"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Foreign Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","name":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","datePublished":"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222744"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222744\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}