{"id":222744,"date":"2019-12-02T14:39:44","date_gmt":"2019-12-02T09:09:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222744"},"modified":"2019-12-02T14:39:44","modified_gmt":"2019-12-02T09:09:44","slug":"sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","title":{"rendered":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:\u00a0<\/strong>A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, CJ and Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, and Murdu N.B. Fernando, PC, JJ., allowed appeals filed by two appellants out of eight accused.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The two Accused-Appellant-Petitioners (hereinafter called Appellants) were charged along with six others in the Magistrate\u2019s Court of Jaffna. They were charged for \u201cJoining an Unlawful Assembly armed with any deadly weapon\u201d, an offence punishable under Section 141 of the Penal Code; \u201cVoluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt by dangerous weapons or means\u201d while being members of an unlawful assembly, an offence punishable under Section 317 read with Section 146 of the Penal Code; and \u201cVoluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt by dangerous weapons or means\u201d punishable under Section 317 read with Section 32 of the Penal Code.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Magistrate convicted all eight accused for the first two counts, after trial. The two appellants being aggrieved with the conviction and the sentence appealed to the High Court of Jaffna.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The High Court Judge affirmed the conviction and sentence. Thus the instant appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Counsels for the appellants M.A. Sumanthiran, PC, J. Arulanantham and D. Mascarange contended that he would mainly address the issue of dock identification as there was no proper dock identification relating to two appellants and there was no sufficient evidence to establish the identity of the two appellants. There was no dispute that neither the victim nor any other witness, in this case, knew the two appellants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court while allowing the appeal opinioned that the evidence was unsatisfactory and the conviction and sentence of the two appellants was set aside accordingly acquitted. [Rathnasingham Janushan v. Officer In-charge, SC (Spl) Appeal No. 07 of 2018, decided on 04-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:\u00a0A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, CJ and Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, and <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":147611,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[3468,2538,2519,38617],"class_list":["post-222744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-conviction","tag-Magistrate","tag-Sentence","tag-voluntarily-causing-grievous-hurt-by-dangerous-weapons-or-means"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:\u00a0A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, CJ and Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/\",\"name\":\"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction","og_description":"Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka:\u00a0A Full Bench of Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, CJ and Priyantha Jayawardena, PC, and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/","name":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","datePublished":"2019-12-02T09:09:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/02\/sl-sc-conviction-set-aside-due-to-unsatisfactory-nature-of-evidence-not-sufficient-to-uphold-conviction\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SL SC | Conviction set aside due to unsatisfactory nature of evidence not sufficient to uphold conviction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/Supreme-Court-of-Sri-Lanka.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6331,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/08\/07\/principle-of-just-punishment-the-bedrock-of-sentencing-in-a-criminal-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":222744,"position":0},"title":"Principle of Just Punishment the bedrock of sentencing in a criminal offence","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 7, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench comprising S.K. Mukhopadhaya and Ranjan Gogoi, JJ., referring to the decision in Gopal Singh v. State of Uttarakhand, (2013) 7 SCC 545 observed that principle of just punishment is the bedrock of sentencing in respect of a criminal offence. The wide discretion that is vested in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Supreme Court&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Supreme Court","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/supremecourt\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211156,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/01\/bom-hc-conviction-for-murder-turned-into-grievous-hurt-where-death-occurred-after-injured-shifted-to-another-hospital-against-medical-advice\/","url_meta":{"origin":222744,"position":1},"title":"Bom HC | Conviction for murder turned into grievous hurt where death occurred after injured shifted to another hospital against medical advice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0The Bench of A.S. Oka and A.S. Gadkari, JJ. modified the judgment of trial\u00a0court and altered the appellant's conviction under Section 302\u00a0(punishment for murder)\u00a0to Section 326 IPC (voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means). The deceased, Farukh Shaikh had two wives. He doubted that the appellant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365291,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/31\/sc-unlawful-assembly-vicarious-liability-section-149-conviction-murder-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":222744,"position":2},"title":"&#8216;Members of unlawful assembly vicariously liable once common object and participation are proved, regardless of individual acts&#8217;; SC upholds conviction of 3 in murder case","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 31, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Trial Court overlooked the consistent and corroborated testimony of injured eyewitnesses and failed to appreciate the legal effect of the active participation of the appellants as members of an unlawful assembly. The High Court, in reversing the acquittal, has given cogent and well-reasoned findings based on a proper appraisal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"unlawful assembly","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/unlawful-assembly.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/unlawful-assembly.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/unlawful-assembly.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/unlawful-assembly.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221341,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/21\/bom-hc-sole-convict-in-a-case-connected-to-1992-babri-masjid-riots-in-mumbai-set-free-due-to-defective-charge\/","url_meta":{"origin":222744,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Sole convict in a case connected to 1992 Babri Masjid riots in Mumbai set free due to defective charge \u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Sadhana S. Jadhav, J. allowed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 326 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means) and 452 (house-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273290,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/08\/supreme-court-karnataka-high-court-section-302-of-the-penal-code-section-378-crpc-conviction-acquittal-unlawful-assembly-murder-common-object-first-information-reports-rioting-trespass-wi\/","url_meta":{"origin":222744,"position":4},"title":"Reversing acquittal of only 2 out of 22 acquitted murder accused, despite glaring contradictions between witness testimonies, illogical; SC sets aside Karnataka HC verdict","author":"Editor","date":"September 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Supreme Court: In an appeal against the Karnataka High Court's reversal of acquittal of 2 out of the 22 accused acquitted by the Sessions Court in a murder case, the bench of V. Ramasubramanian*and Indira Banerjee, JJ has reversed the High Court's verdict observing that there were glaring\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-69-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214849,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/18\/mp-hc-participation-of-co-accused-must-be-proved-beyond-doubt-for-conviction-under-s-147-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222744,"position":5},"title":"MP HC | Participation of co-accused must be proved beyond doubt, for conviction under S. 147 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.C. Sharma, J. allowed a criminal appeal, filed against the order of conviction under Ss. 304, 323 and 149 of IPC, 1860 passed by Trial Court. Prosecution narrated that, daughter of appellant got sick one day; he suspected that deceased and his wife had practiced \u2018witchcraft\u2019\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222744"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222744\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/147611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}