{"id":222719,"date":"2019-11-30T15:30:29","date_gmt":"2019-11-30T10:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222719"},"modified":"2019-11-30T12:48:54","modified_gmt":"2019-11-30T07:18:54","slug":"malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/","title":{"rendered":"Malaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner"},"content":{"rendered":"

Malaysia Court of Appeal: <\/b>A Full Bench of Hamid Sultan Bin Abu Backer, Hanipah Binti Farikullah, Kamaludin Bin Md Said, JCA overturned a decision of a High Court which ordered a tenant to vacant possession and pay double rental to the new owner of a land due to the non-existence of any legal tenancy agreement between the two. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The appellant\/defendant had been a tenant of the land the respondent\/plaintiff bought at an auction on 12-09-2019 and hence, the validity of the tenancy agreement was called into question. The defendant contested that the tenancy agreement was until 14-10-2019 but there was no legal proof to support that claim. Essentially, there was no legal backing behind the defendant\u2019s claims while the argument of the plaintiff was bolstered by Section 28(4) of the Civil Law Act, 1956 which allows for entitlement to double rental in case there is no valid tenancy agreement.<\/p>\n

The Court of Appeals, however, found no basis for allowing the double rental. On one hand, the respondent does not want to recognise the appellant as a tenant and on the other, he wants double rental based on a tenancy agreement with the previous owner. Stating the same, the Court set aside the judgment of the High Court and said that the appellant should give up possession on the agreed date along with full but not double rental. The Court issues no order as to costs.\u00a0<\/span>[Abad Arena Juara Sdn Bhd v. Rajesh A\/L Jaikishan, Appeal Civil No. N-04(NCVC)(W)-659-12 of 2018, decided on 26-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Malaysia Court of Appeal: A Full Bench of Hamid Sultan Bin Abu Backer, Hanipah Binti Farikullah, Kamaludin Bin Md Said, JCA overturned <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":78351,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[2998,38608,38607,38609,7921],"class_list":["post-222719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-Agreement","tag-double-rent","tag-legal-tenancy","tag-new-owner","tag-tenant"],"yoast_head":"\nMalaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Malaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Malaysia Court of Appeal: A Full Bench of Hamid Sultan Bin Abu Backer, Hanipah Binti Farikullah, Kamaludin Bin Md Said, JCA overturned\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-30T10:00:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/\",\"name\":\"Malaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-30T10:00:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Malaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Malaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Malaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner","og_description":"Malaysia Court of Appeal: A Full Bench of Hamid Sultan Bin Abu Backer, Hanipah Binti Farikullah, Kamaludin Bin Md Said, JCA overturned","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-30T10:00:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/","name":"Malaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-11-30T10:00:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/malaysia-coa-new-owner-cannot-claim-entitlement-to-double-rental-on-the-basis-of-a-tenancy-agreement-with-previous-owner\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Malaysia CoA | New owner cannot claim entitlement to double rental on the basis of a tenancy agreement with previous owner"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Court-of-Appeal-Malaysia_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/30\/del-hc-landlord-entitled-for-judgment-on-admissions-in-a-suit-for-ejectment-where-tenant-unequivocally-admits-the-ingredients-to-be-established-by-the-landlord\/","url_meta":{"origin":222719,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Landlord entitled for judgment on admissions in a suit for ejectment where tenant unequivocally admits the ingredients to be established by the landlord","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Sanjeev Sachdeva, J., allowed a petition that challenged the impugned order whereby petitioner's application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC for judgment on admissions was rejected. The petitioner (landlord) had filed a suit for possession of the suit property which was owned by her. She had prayed for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":212235,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/18\/pak-sc-cantonments-rent-restriction-act-does-not-prohibit-periodical-increase-in-rent-agreed-between-parties\/","url_meta":{"origin":222719,"position":1},"title":"Pak SC | Cantonments Rent Restriction Act does not prohibit periodical increase in rent agreed between parties","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of Pakistan: The Three-Judge Bench of Mushir Alam, Faisal Arab and Ijaz ul Ahsan allowed an appeal filed by a landlord and directed the tenant to vacate premises for failure to pay rent in terms of the tenancy agreement. Respondent herein was inducted as a tenant in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/supreme_court_of_jpakistan.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203182,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/tenancy-cannot-be-terminated-on-the-ground-of-unregistered-agreement-for-sale\/","url_meta":{"origin":222719,"position":2},"title":"Tenancy cannot be terminated on the ground of unregistered agreement for sale","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rajesh Kumar, J., dismissed a second appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby a decree of eviction was passed against the appellants. The respondents (landlords) had filed a suit for eviction against the appellants (tenants) because of personal reasons\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":40841,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/03\/30\/tenanted-premises-where-a-woman-lives-with-her-husband-comes-within-the-category-of-shared-household-but-as-long-as-the-tenancy-survives\/","url_meta":{"origin":222719,"position":3},"title":"Tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband comes within the category of shared household, but as long as the tenancy survives","author":"Sucheta","date":"March 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While disposing of an appeal relating eviction of tenant on the ground of termination of tenancy the Court held that, the tenanted premises where a woman lives with her husband would definitely come within the category of shared household but as long as the tenancy survives. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":242863,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/27\/uttar-pradesh-regulation-of-urban-premises-tenancy-ordinance-2021-establishment-of-rent-authority-and-tribunals-read-ordinance\/","url_meta":{"origin":222719,"position":4},"title":"Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Ordinance, 2021: Establishment of Rent Authority and Tribunals [Read Ordinance]","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 27, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Governor of Uttar Pradesh promulgates the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Ordinance, 2021 Purpose of the Ordinance: To establish Rent Authority and Rent Tribunals to regulate renting of premises and to protect the interests of landlords and tenants and to provide speedy adjudication mechanism for resolution of disputes\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Legislation Updates"","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/up-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233816,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/12\/lease-renewal-thereof\/","url_meta":{"origin":222719,"position":5},"title":"Lease: Renewal Thereof","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 12, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Achal Gupta*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Lease.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222719\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/78351"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}