{"id":222618,"date":"2019-11-28T13:15:21","date_gmt":"2019-11-28T07:45:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222618"},"modified":"2019-12-05T13:02:58","modified_gmt":"2019-12-05T07:32:58","slug":"raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Rajasthan High Court:<\/b> Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. was hearing a petition on the issue pertaining to taking possession of the mortgaged property by the respondent bank. <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest\u00a0Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). Petitioners are guarantors against the loan taken by one Tej Prakash Singh.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the petitioner Pawan Kumar Sharma argued that even after the repayment of the loan amount the respondent bank was taking the possession of the mortgaged property by declaring the account as a Non-Performance Account (NPA) and no reason had been provided for the same. Further, the counsel informed that a caveat that was filed before taking action under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act had not been considered and no right of hearing was offered before passing the impugned order. The counsel also prayed before the bench to provide them with the liberty to avail the appropriate forum for redressal of their grievance.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High\u00a0Court dismissed the writ petition by stating that it is not willing to interfere in the order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act which states that only District Magistrate or Metropolitan Magistrate has jurisdiction to assist a secured creditor in taking possession of a secured asset. It relied on the case of <i>Pradeep Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/07bP0G6K\">2019 SCC OnLine Raj 206<\/a><i> <\/i>that a person has appropriate remedy provided to him under the SARFAESI Act in case if he has any grievance under Section 14 of the aforementioned act and also the petitioner is always at liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of their grievances.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>[Ravinder Pratap Singh v. Kotak Mahindra Bank, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/H6E4z919\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Raj 3964<\/b><\/a>, decided on 11-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. was hearing a petition on the issue pertaining to taking possession of the mortgaged property <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[23114,38557,30292,38559,38558,38556,13551],"class_list":["post-222618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-alternate-remedies","tag-guarantors","tag-loan","tag-mortgage-property","tag-non-performance-account","tag-section-14-of-sarfaesi-act","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. was hearing a petition on the issue pertaining to taking possession of the mortgaged property\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-28T07:45:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-12-05T07:32:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-28T07:45:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-12-05T07:32:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: Ashok Kumar Gaur, J. was hearing a petition on the issue pertaining to taking possession of the mortgaged property","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-28T07:45:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-12-05T07:32:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/","name":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-28T07:45:21+00:00","dateModified":"2019-12-05T07:32:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/raj-hc-writ-petition-not-maintainable-against-s-14-of-sarfaesi-act-as-alternative-remedies-for-the-same-can-be-availed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Writ Petition not maintainable against S. 14 of SARFAESI Act as alternative remedies for the same can be availed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":223865,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/06\/ker-hc-art-226-petition-against-sarfaesi-recovery-proceedings-entertained-court-gives-peremptory-orders-cannot-be-challenged-in-any-court-or-forum\/","url_meta":{"origin":222618,"position":0},"title":"Ker HC | Art. 226 petition against SARFAESI recovery proceedings entertained; Court gives peremptory orders, cannot be challenged in any Court or Forum","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 6, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: C.S. Dias, J. disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is the wife of one Senthil Kumar, accused under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The husband of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":236755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/05\/jhar-hc%e2%94%82-loan-by-financial-institutions-is-in-the-nature-of-public-money-writ-petition-not-maintainable-as-alternative-remedy-available-under-s-17-of-sarfaesi-act-if-aggrie\/","url_meta":{"origin":222618,"position":1},"title":"Jhar HC | Loan by financial institutions is in the nature of \u2018public money\u2019; Writ Petition not maintainable as alternative remedy available under S. 17 of SARFAESI Act if aggrieved due to action taken by \u2018State\u2019 under S. 13\/14 of the Act","author":"Editor","date":"October 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: Rajesh Shankar, J. dismissed the petition on grounds of non-maintainability. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner took a loan to the tune of Rs 4, 25,000 from the respondent bank namely Allahabad Bank. Due to default in payment of money, a notice was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299781,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/21\/no-bar-secured-creditor-directly-proceed-s14-sarfaesi-act-after-withdrawing-s134-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222618,"position":2},"title":"No bar in law for a secured creditor to directly proceed u\/s 14 of SARFAESI Act after withdrawing measures taken u\/s 13(4): Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe scope of writ jurisdiction cannot be allowed to trounce the statutory obligation, on the stratagem of efficacious alternate remedy.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/delhi-high-court-section-35-section-37-proceedings-under-sarfaesi-remain-unaffected-sebi\/","url_meta":{"origin":222618,"position":3},"title":"Whether SEBI in exercise of powers under SEBI Act can prevent a bank from proceeding under SARFAESI Act, 2002? Delhi High Court analyses","author":"Arunima","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"SEBI is possessed with powers under the SEBI Act, 1992 to direct the petitioner bank in specific, and banks in general, regardless of them being registered with SEBI.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322898,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/24\/whether-housing-finance-company-recover-loan-amount-less-than-%e2%82%b920-lakh-under-sarfaesi-act-mp-high-court-answers-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":222618,"position":4},"title":"Whether Housing Finance Company can recover loan amount of less than \u20b920 lakh under SARFAESI Act? MP High Court answers","author":"Ritu","date":"May 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"MP High Court held that the writ petition is maintainable due to the pure legal questions involved regarding the applicability of SARFAESI Act provisions to HFCs for amounts below the Rs. 20 Lakhs threshold.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240806,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/17\/ker-hc-sarfaesi-act-whether-the-state-has-better-right-in-comparison-to-banks-and-other-financial-institutions-over-secured-assets-for-recovery-of-its-dues-legal-position-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":222618,"position":5},"title":"Ker HC | [SARFAESI Act] Whether the State has better right in comparison to Banks and other Financial Institutions over secured assets for recovery of its dues; legal position reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"December 17, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: A.M. Badar J., allowing the present petition, quashes the attachment made by the State authorities to recover tax dues. Background Counsel appearing for the petitioner argued that for repayment of loan availed by its borrower, the property comprised in Mannanchery village was mortgaged by the borrower. As\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222618\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}