{"id":222613,"date":"2019-11-28T11:15:09","date_gmt":"2019-11-28T05:45:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222613"},"modified":"2020-02-17T15:55:53","modified_gmt":"2020-02-17T10:25:53","slug":"sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/","title":{"rendered":"SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):<\/b>\u00a0Coram of Justice Tarun Agarwala, (Presiding Officer), Justice M. T. Joshi (Judicial Member), and Dr C. K. G. Nair (Member) partly allowed an appeal filed by the appellant against an order of the Disciplinary Action Committee (DAC) of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) whereby they rejected an application to review their earlier order dated 02-08-2018.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Through the impugned order, the appellant was fined with a monetary penalty of Rs 15 lakhs and with a suspension of trading membership of the appellant from all segments of NSE for 5 days. The NSE had conducted an inspection for the period from 1-01-2017 to 7-09-2017. They imposed a consolidated monetary penalty of Rs 50,000 for the minor violations and issued a show-cause notice asking as to why the penalty should not be imposed on them for the alleged violations. The stated violations were:-<\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li>Unexplained use of funds raised by pledging client securities with NBFCs and Banks to the tune of Rs 19.23 crores belonging to 515 clients.<\/li>\n<li>Acceptance of deposits by offering fixed returns from more than 200 entities to the tune of Rs 21.56 crores and not reflecting such receipts of funds in the financial ledgers\/ trial balance of the appellant.<\/li>\n<li>Discrepancy in computation of net worth and misrepresentation of data submitted to the Exchange.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Because of the aforesaid violations, it was held that the appellant has failed to abide by the Code of Conduct for trading member prescribed under Regulation 4.5.1 and 4.5.2 of CM and F&amp;O Segments relating to adherence to SEBI Code of Conduct and general principles of professionalism, adherence to trading principles, honesty and fairness.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Prakash Shah, Counsel for the appellant submitted that securities belonging to some clients were pledged with NBFCs, etc. because of margin shortfall from those clients. Appellant had enough liquid funds available with it to meet the full obligations. Allegation relating to accepting deposits from clients promising assured returns, too was not correct because it was short term unsecured loans taken from external sources to promote appellant\u2019s proprietary arbitrage and ALGO trading business. Regarding the third allegation, it was submitted that a revised net worth certificate was produced which the DAC had noted in the impugned order and therefore no action should be taken.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The counsel for the respondent, Nimay Dave, on the other hand, stated that the allegations against the appellant were serious as was clearly shown that funds to the tune of ` 19.23 crores were raised in excess of respective client\u2019s obligation by pledging the securities belonging to those clients. More than 350 out of 515 clients did not have any obligation\/ debit balance but still, their securities were pledged by the appellant.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal held that the magnitude of money involved was large in terms of acceptance of deposits to the tune of Rs 21.56 crores and non-settlement of funds belonging to 601 clients etc. However, since the appellant had complied with some of the directions issued by the DAC, the penalty imposed on the appellant was disproportionate with the facts and circumstances. However, the violations were not light enough to let off the appellants free as contended by them. They upheld the monetary penalty of Rs 15 lakh imposed on the appellant and modified the direction relating to suspension of the appellant from all segments of the exchange NSE for 5 days to that of a direction not to enroll or register any fresh clients for a period of one month.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>[KSBL Securities Ltd. v. National Stock Exchange of (India) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0fRFC9Lt\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine SAT 242<\/b><\/a>, decided on 26-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):\u00a0Coram of Justice Tarun Agarwala, (Presiding Officer), Justice M. T. Joshi (Judicial Member), and Dr C. K. G. Nair <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":209781,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[37194,8991,35443,35444,2945,38553,38554,38552],"class_list":["post-222613","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-acceptance-of-deposits","tag-appeal","tag-disciplinary-action-committee","tag-national-stock-exchange-of-india-limited","tag-NBFC","tag-sebi-code-of-conduct","tag-suspension-of-trading-membership","tag-trading-membership"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):\u00a0Coram of Justice Tarun Agarwala, (Presiding Officer), Justice M. T. Joshi (Judicial Member), and Dr C. K. G. Nair\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-28T05:45:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-02-17T10:25:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/\",\"name\":\"SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-28T05:45:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-02-17T10:25:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month","og_description":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT):\u00a0Coram of Justice Tarun Agarwala, (Presiding Officer), Justice M. T. Joshi (Judicial Member), and Dr C. K. G. Nair","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-28T05:45:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-02-17T10:25:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/","name":"SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","datePublished":"2019-11-28T05:45:09+00:00","dateModified":"2020-02-17T10:25:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/28\/sat-tribunal-modifies-suspension-of-appellant-from-nse-for-5-days-to-banning-them-from-registering-new-clients-for-a-period-of-one-month-while-upholding-monetary-penalty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SAT | Tribunal modifies suspension of appellant from NSE for 5 days to banning them from registering new clients for a period of one month"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":214740,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/16\/sat-an-order-without-reasons-is-violative-of-article-14-of-constitution-appeal-allowed-in-light-of-clause-17-of-the-nse-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":222613,"position":0},"title":"SAT | An order without reasons is violative of Article 14 of Constitution; appeal allowed in light of Clause 17 of the NSE Rules","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), Mumbai : The Bench of Tarun Agarwala, J. (Presiding Officer) and C.K.G. Nair (Member) and M.T. Joshi, J., (Judicial Member) allowed the appeal filed questioning the veracity and legality of the order passed by the Disciplinary Action Committee of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":215618,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/12\/sat-proportionality-is-a-basic-principle-to-adhere-while-interpreting-any-provisions-relating-to-punishment-with-serious-consequences\/","url_meta":{"origin":222613,"position":1},"title":"SAT | &#8220;Proportionality&#8221; is a basic principle to adhere while interpreting any provisions relating to punishment with serious consequences","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): The Coram of Tarun Agarwala, J. (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member), M.T. Joshi, J. (Judicial Member) partly allowed the appeal in the present case with no order on costs. The facts of the case are that the appellant is a member broker in the Capital\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245918,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/22\/stock-exchange\/","url_meta":{"origin":222613,"position":2},"title":"SAT | Separate penalties by the stock exchanges can be imposed | While positing, rejects appeal","author":"Editor","date":"March 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): A Coram of Tarun Agarwala, J., (Presiding Officer) and M.T. Joshi, J., (Judicial Member) while dismissing an appeal held that separate penalties by the stock exchanges could be imposed. In the present matter, BSE and NSE separately imposed a penalty of Rs 12 lakh for violation\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":196120,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/05\/19\/sat-transactions-in-nature-of-loan-not-liable-for-relief-accorded-by-investor-protection-fund\/","url_meta":{"origin":222613,"position":3},"title":"SAT: Transactions in nature of loan not liable for relief accorded by Investor Protection Fund","author":"Saba","date":"May 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal: SAT, Mumbai dismissed two appeals claiming compensation from the National Stock Exchange\u2019s Investor Protection Fund stating that loan transactions were not protected by the NSE bye-laws. The appellants opened a trading account with one Kassa FinServ (\u201cKassa\u201d) by depositing some money and receiving interest\/loyalty bonus on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/appoointment.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255636,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/15\/does-the-doctrine-of-double-jeopardy-apply-to-defaults-under-sebi-lodr-regulations\/","url_meta":{"origin":222613,"position":4},"title":"Does the doctrine of Double Jeopardy apply to defaults under SEBI (LODR) Regulations?","author":"Editor","date":"October 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"By Abhishek Kale* and Darshan Furia**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/MicrosoftTeams-image-52.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218502,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/22\/sat-fine-imposed-on-appellant-for-non-compliance-of-regulation-33-of-sebi-reduced-on-account-of-this-mistake-being-a-technical-defect\/","url_meta":{"origin":222613,"position":5},"title":"SAT | Fine imposed on appellant for non-compliance of Regulation 33 of SEBI reduced on account of this mistake being a technical defect","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 22, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT): Coram of Justice Tarun Agarwala (Presiding Officer), Dr C.K.G. Nair (Member), and Justice M.T. Joshi (Judicial Member) held the appellants responsible for non-compliance of Regulation 33 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulation, 2015. The imposed a fine of Rs 5,54,600 on the appellants for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/SAT-MUMBAI.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222613"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222613\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/209781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}