{"id":222589,"date":"2019-11-27T17:00:56","date_gmt":"2019-11-27T11:30:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222589"},"modified":"2019-11-29T10:10:06","modified_gmt":"2019-11-29T04:40:06","slug":"mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/b> G.S. Ahluwalia, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners claiming that the Additional Director General of Police was unlawfully encroaching upon their land.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioners had claimed that they had approached the relevant authorities, but no action was taken by them. They subsequently filed a writ petition praying the Court to declare the construction over the land in dispute by the respondent as illegal, unauthorized, and encroachment. They prayed for dismantling the unauthorized construction of the hotel building and to remove the restriction\/hindrance caused in the way of the petitioners in approaching the property.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Counsel for the petitioners, Balwant Singh Kushwah, argued that the right to hold the property was a fundamental right and, therefore, the petition was maintainable. It is also submitted that the respondent had also encroached upon some other plots and accordingly, the husband of the petitioner had also filed a civil suit for declaration of title and permanent injunctions. By an order dated 30-06-2014 passed in a Civil Suit, the respondent was restrained from interfering with the possession, however, the respondent had dispossessed the husband of the petitioner, therefore the suit would not be an efficacious remedy. It was further submitted that the husband of the petitioner had not filed an application under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC. Furthermore, there was no averment in the petition that the order stated above had attained finality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court, however, held that it was incorrect to state that, \u201c<i>right to hold a property is a fundamental right<\/i>\u201d. They explained that the petition was filed primarily against the respondent in his individual personal capacity and not against any act done by him in the capacity of Additional Director General of Police. It is a well-established principle of law that the writ petition against a private individual is not maintainable. If the petitioner was of the view that the respondent was illegally trying to encroach upon the land or had illegally taken possession of the said land, then they always have an efficacious remedy of filing a Civil Suit. The Court was of the opinion that the petition was not maintainable and dismissed it.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>[Laxmi Devi v. State of M.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/zUj08H2r\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine MP 3629<\/b><\/a>, decided on 25-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners claiming that the Additional Director General of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3457,9881,30456,38524,31617,38523,13551],"class_list":["post-222589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-encroachment","tag-fundamental-right","tag-land","tag-order-39-rule-2-a-cpc","tag-private-individual","tag-right-to-hold-property","tag-writ-petition"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners claiming that the Additional Director General of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-27T11:30:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-29T04:40:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-27T11:30:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-29T04:40:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners claiming that the Additional Director General of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-27T11:30:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-29T04:40:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/","name":"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-27T11:30:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-29T04:40:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/mp-hc-incorrect-to-state-that-right-to-hold-property-is-a-fundamental-right-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-not-maintainable\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | Incorrect to state that right to hold property is a fundamental right; writ petition against a private individual not maintainable"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222988,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/09\/mp-hc-writ-petition-against-a-private-individual-is-not-maintainable-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":222589,"position":0},"title":"MP HC | Writ Petition against a private individual is not maintainable, reiterated","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G.S. Ahluwalia, J. while dismissing the petition, observed that the petitioners have an efficacious remedy of filing a Civil Suit against illegal possession of the land. In the instant case, reliefs in the nature of writ of certiorari was sought to be issued to declare the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299552,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/calcutta-hc-restrains-encroachment-of-private-land-by-respondent-authorities\/","url_meta":{"origin":222589,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court restrains Irrigation and Waterways Department from encroaching private land","author":"Ritu","date":"August 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that the respondents had not acquired the land in question and issued a writ of mandamus to restrain the encroachment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/23\/state-adverse-possession-over-private-land-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222589,"position":2},"title":"State cannot forcibly acquire citizen\u2019s land and claim adverse possession or delay to perfect title: J&amp;K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe fundamental right guaranteed to a citizen cannot be said to have been waived by a citizen for remaining silent for long time more particularly when the State has failed in its constitutional obligation to follow the process of land acquisition before taking over the private property of a citizen.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"State adverse possession over private land","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/State-adverse-possession-over-private-land.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/State-adverse-possession-over-private-land.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/State-adverse-possession-over-private-land.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/State-adverse-possession-over-private-land.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":326437,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/12\/delhi-hc-directs-elderly-man-spend-day-court-punishment-for-conempt-of-courts-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222589,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Elderly Man to Spend Day in Court as Punishment for Contempt over Property Price Manipulation","author":"Editor","date":"July 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The contemnor used the filing of the writ petition as another weapon in his armour to try and get the price reduced for the land. Such conduct of any person to abuse the judicial process cannot be ignored or left unpunished.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216283,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/raj-hc-encroachment-over-pasture-land-to-be-dealt-with-specialized-land-protection-cell-in-order-to-curtail-large-number-of-public-interest-litigation-applications\/","url_meta":{"origin":222589,"position":4},"title":"Raj HC | Encroachment over pasture land to be dealt with specialized Land Protection Cell in order to curtail large number of Public Interest Litigation applications","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Goverdhan Bardhar and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. disposed of a Public Interest Litigation, directing the specialized authorities to take necessary actions against the respondents to prevent encroachment over the pasture land of the petitioners. In the instant case, the Counsel representing the Petitioners, Rakesh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":322568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/20\/rajasthan-high-court-stays-anti-encroachment-drive-in-jalore-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":222589,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan High Court stays anti-encroachment drive in Jalore","author":"Ritu","date":"May 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The residents of Odwada village in Jalore district faced an anti-encroachment drive on a 35-acre piece of pasture land, following Court\u2019s previous order directing removal of encroachments from the government pasture land.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Rajasthan-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222589"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222589\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}