{"id":222574,"date":"2019-11-27T09:50:03","date_gmt":"2019-11-27T04:20:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222574"},"modified":"2019-11-29T13:14:08","modified_gmt":"2019-11-29T07:44:08","slug":"bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/","title":{"rendered":"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>S.C. Gupte, J., while allowing a second appeal filed by the plaintiff against the order of the first Appellate court, held that the suit filed for protecting the possession of immovable property based on settled exclusive possession cannot be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to prove title to the suit property.<\/p>\n

The plaintiff claimed that the suit property was gifted orally to him by one Hamid. He claimed that the defendants were interfering in his peaceful possession of the suit property. Therefore, he filed a suit for perpetual injunction against the defendants, which was allowed by the trial court. It was an admitted fact the plaintiff\u00a0was, all throughout, in exclusive possession of the suit property. However, on appeal, the First Appellate Court reversed the order passed by the trial court. Hence, the present the second appeal by the plaintiff.<\/p>\n

The substantial question of law to be decided in this appeal, as reframed by the High Court was:\u00a0Can a suit filed for protecting the possession of immovable property based on settled exclusive possession be dismissed on the ground that the Plaintiff has failed to prove title to the suit property?<\/em><\/p>\n

After hearing Pramod N. Joshi, Advocate for the plaintiff, and Sharad T. Bhosale, Advocate for the respondent-defendants, the High Court perused the record and reached the conclusion that the substantial question as framed above had to be answered in the negative. Explaining the fundamental fallacy in the impugned order, the Court explained: “The District Court has dismissed the plaintiff’s suit for protecting his possession without in any way having questioned the plaintiff’s exclusive possession of the suit property. If his exclusive possession was not debated\/questioned, assuming without admitting that his exclusive ownership through the purported oral gift by Hamid\u00a0Husein was not proved unless the defendants actually showed either their pre-existing physical possession or their entitlement to the suit property\u00a0by a succession, testamentary or intestate, the plaintiff was entitled to the perpetual injunction sought by him.”<\/p>\n

It was further observed that the defendant’s’ claim to be in physical possession of the suit property was neither accepted by the trial court nor by the First Appellate Court, and the only case of entitlement pleaded by the defendants having also\u00a0been found against them by both courts below, they had no case to resist the plaintiff’s claim for protecting his admitted possession of the suit property.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, the second appeal filed by the plaintiff was allowed; the impugned judgment of the First Appellate Court was set aside, and the order passed by the trial court was restored. [Kadar Raju Shaikh v. Abbas Pirmohamad Shaikh, 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 4688<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bombay High Court:\u00a0S.C. Gupte, J., while allowing a second appeal filed by the plaintiff against the order of the first Appellate court, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":74381,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38508,34844,38507,3590,31861,28134],"class_list":["post-222574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-exclusive-possession","tag-perpetual-injunction","tag-possession-of-immovable-property","tag-property","tag-suit","tag-title"],"yoast_head":"\nBom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court:\u00a0S.C. Gupte, J., while allowing a second appeal filed by the plaintiff against the order of the first Appellate court,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-27T04:20:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-29T07:44:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1331\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/\",\"name\":\"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-27T04:20:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-29T07:44:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg\",\"width\":1331,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession","og_description":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0S.C. Gupte, J., while allowing a second appeal filed by the plaintiff against the order of the first Appellate court,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-27T04:20:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-29T07:44:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1331,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/","name":"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2019-11-27T04:20:03+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-29T07:44:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","width":1331,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/27\/bom-hc-plaintiff-protecting-possession-of-immovable-property-need-not-prove-title-to-it-where-suit-filed-on-the-basis-of-settled-exclusive-possession\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bom HC | Plaintiff protecting possession of immovable property need not prove title to it where suit filed on the basis of settled exclusive possession"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":202163,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/24\/scope-of-section-9-of-the-jk-specific-relief-act-1977-is-limited-to-determination-of-possession-of-the-plaintiff-over-suit-property\/","url_meta":{"origin":222574,"position":0},"title":"Scope of Section 9 of the J&K Specific Relief Act, 1977 is limited to determination of possession of the plaintiff over suit property","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir: A Single Judge bench comprising of Sanjeev Kumar, J. while dealing with a civil revision petition directed against the judgment of trial court passed in relation to Section 9 of the Jammu & Kashmir Specific Relief Act, 1977 declined to interfere with trial court\u2019s judgment directing re-possession\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":338700,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/09\/period-of-limitation-to-regain-title-of-property-by-setting-aside-sale-deed-is-3-yrs-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222574,"position":1},"title":"3 years or 12 years? Supreme Court clarifies the period of limitation to regain title and recover possession of suit property by setting aside the sale deed","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the suit is based on the title for possession, once the title is established on the basis of relevant documents and other evidence unless the defendant proves adverse possession for the prescriptive period, the plaintiff cannot be non-suited.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Limitation for title of property","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Limitation-for-title-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Limitation-for-title-of-property.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Limitation-for-title-of-property.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Limitation-for-title-of-property.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":223388,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/19\/bom-hc-permissive-possession-different-from-adverse-possession-cause-of-action-arises-to-plaintiff-only-when-defendant-sets-up-adverse-title\/","url_meta":{"origin":222574,"position":2},"title":"Bom HC | Permissive possession different from adverse possession; Cause of action arises to plaintiff only when defendant sets up adverse title","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0S.C. Gupte, J., dismissed a second appeal filed against the orders of courts below where the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff for possession of the suit property was decreed. The plaintiff's suit was based on his title to the suit property. Plaintiff's grandfather was the owner of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270781,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/28\/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-co-owners-of-the-joint-property-cannot-prevent-each-other-from-using-the-property-appeal-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":222574,"position":3},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court | Co-owners of the joint property cannot prevent each other from using the property; appeal dismissed","author":"Editor","date":"July 28, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Punjab and Haryana High Court: Alka Sarin, J., while dismissing the appeal preferred by the plaintiff against the judgments passed by the trial court and the appellate court held that when a suit land is not partitioned and the parties to the suit are the co-sharers and co-owners,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255314,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/08\/person-was-minor-at-the-time-of-execution-of-sale-deed-will-registration-of-sale-deed-be-invalid\/","url_meta":{"origin":222574,"position":4},"title":"Person was minor at the time of execution of sale deed, will registration of sale deed be invalid? Read detailed verdict on property dispute","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi: Naresh Kumar Laka, Additional District Judge, decided a suit with respect to partition and permanent injunction. Instant suit was filed for partition and other reliefs by claiming that the plaintiff was a joint owner of 1\/3rd share of the suit property and Defendants 1\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Saket Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/District-Court-Saket.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/District-Court-Saket.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/District-Court-Saket.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/District-Court-Saket.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/District-Court-Saket.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258672,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/17\/shared-household-3\/","url_meta":{"origin":222574,"position":5},"title":"Daughter-in-law claims right of residence in late husband\u2019s mothers\u2019 property under the head \u2018Shared Household\u2019: Mother-in-law approaches Del HC seeking eviction of daughter-in-law | Read what HC says","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Explaining the significance of \u2018shared household\u2019 Asha Menon, J., explained that where a residence is clearly a shared household, it would not bar the owner from claiming eviction against her daughter-in-law, if circumstances call for it. An instant suit was filed for possession, damages and permanent injunction\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222574"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222574\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/74381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}