{"id":222525,"date":"2019-11-26T12:00:18","date_gmt":"2019-11-26T06:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222525"},"modified":"2019-11-29T10:07:59","modified_gmt":"2019-11-29T04:37:59","slug":"jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n

This is a case of respondents\/plaintiff where a petition was filed on 01-02-2018 about some particular documents which could not have been filed at the time of presenting the plaint. On further, cross-examination of the document\u2019s relevancy was assessed and it led the plaintiffs to file the petition where they requested leave from the trial court for marking those documents.<\/p>\n

The petitioners had objected to the filed the petition on the grounds that no reason was given as to what held the plaintiffs from protecting the said documents along with the complaint. Another point of contention was that the petition was filed under the provision of Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 instead of Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of The Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908. It was because the Trial Court had the power for granting such relief under the CPC. Hence, the petition should not have been allowed but as per Mr Rajeeva Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioners, the trial court allowed the petition without considering the facts. As a result of this the present writ petition was filed.<\/p>\n

Mr M. Jalisur, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent has referred to the provision of Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of the CPC in defence to order dated 06-03-2018. It was further submitted by the counsel that the writ petition has no merit on the ground that the trial court had granted liberty to cross-examine the witnesses produced by the plaintiff. The respondents had filed an interlocutory application for vacating the stay on the order granted by the court by issuing a notice to the respondent on 10-07-2018.<\/p>\n

The High Court after considering all the legalities and referring to the provisions of Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of the CPC deemed it fit and fair that the power to grant relief, taking into consideration the relevancy of the documents.<\/p>\n

In the following case, the petition has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 5 of Limitation Act rather than Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of the CPC. The court relied on the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court of India in P.K. Palanisamy v. N. Arumugham, <\/em>(2009) 9 SCC 173<\/a> where it was held that mentioning of the wrong provision or not mentioning that provision will not make the order invalid, if the court and\/or statutory authority have the requisite jurisdiction\u00a0 therefore.<\/p>\n

Another question taken into consideration is the question of prejudice. The court on the following question held that in terms of the provision of Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of the CPC give liberty of cross-examining the witnesses to the petitioner.<\/p>\n

Thus, as per the Supervisory jurisdiction in Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Court was not mistaken in warranting any interference by the court. Therefore, the writ petition failed and Interim Order dated 10-07-2018 was vacated. [Jay Shankar Yadav v. Bhola Yadav, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 1509<\/b><\/a>, decided on 07-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. This is <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[26444,38480,30719,26684],"class_list":["post-222525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-interim-order","tag-order-7-rule-14-3-crpc","tag-section-5-of-limitation-act","tag-supervisory-jurisdiction"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. This is\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-26T06:30:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-29T04:37:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-26T06:30:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-29T04:37:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. This is","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-26T06:30:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-29T04:37:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/","name":"Jhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-26T06:30:18+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-29T04:37:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/26\/jhar-hc-petition-cannot-be-rejected-merely-on-the-ground-of-mentioning-wrong-provision-contents-of-petition-must-be-considered-for-the-sake-of-justice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Petition cannot be rejected merely on ground of mentioning wrong provision \u2013 contents of petition must be considered for the sake of justice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":275119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/delhi-high-court-negligence-of-counsel-not-a-reasonable-ground-within-order-xi-rule-15-cpc-facts-of-the-case-must-disclose-urgency-to-avail-benefit-under-or-xi-r-14-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222525,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court| Negligence of counsel not a reasonable ground within Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC; Facts of the case must disclose \u2018urgency\u2019 to avail benefit under Or. XI R. 1(4) CPC","author":"Editor","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by the petitioner challenging dismissal order in relation to an application filed seeking to place on record, certain additional documents which, according to the application, were a necessary and essential part of the suit, but could not be filed with the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207231,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/26\/person-should-have-direct-interest-in-subject-matter-of-litigation-to-be-added-as-party-to-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":222525,"position":1},"title":"Person should have direct interest in subject matter of litigation to be added as party to suit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 26, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed the petition which challenged the order of the trial court whereunder the application of the plaintiffs filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC to implead the wife of Defendant 1 was rejected. The facts of the case\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":324732,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/20\/allahabad-hc-dismisses-neet-ug-aspirant-plea-manual-checking-omr-sheet-she-filed-petition-enclosing-forged-and-fictitious-documents\/","url_meta":{"origin":222525,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Sorry state of affairs that NEET UG Aspirant filed a petition enclosing forged and fictitious documents\u2019: Allahabad HC dismisses her plea for manual checking of OMR sheet","author":"Apoorva","date":"June 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad HC said that it cannot restrain the competent authority \/ authorities from taking any legal action against the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297520,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/24\/writ-petition-filed-after-suit-seeking-same-relief-withdrawn-not-maintainable-sc-reiterates-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222525,"position":3},"title":"Writ Petition filed after Suit seeking same relief was withdrawn without liberty to file afresh not Maintainable: SC reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"July 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court called the matter at hand a classic case in which a litigant had been able to mislead the Courts and authorities at different levels to put life into his stale claim.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"maintainability of writ petition","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/maintainability-of-writ-petition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/maintainability-of-writ-petition.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/maintainability-of-writ-petition.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/maintainability-of-writ-petition.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":213436,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/09\/ori-hc-reasons-are-live-links-between-the-minds-of-the-decision-taker-to-the-controversy-in-question-and-the-decision-arrived-at\/","url_meta":{"origin":222525,"position":4},"title":"Ori HC | Reasons are live links between the minds of decision-taker to the controversy in question and decision arrived at","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Orissa High Court: The Bench of Dr A.K. Rath, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of the Trial Court which rejected an application of the petitioner filed under sub-section (2) of Section 80 CPC to waive notice on the ground of urgency. Plaintiffs-petitioners had instituted the suit for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":194097,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/03\/17\/unless-mind-of-the-court-is-reflected-in-order-sheet-justification-cannot-be-inferred\/","url_meta":{"origin":222525,"position":5},"title":"Unless mind of the court is reflected in order sheet, justification cannot be inferred","author":"Saba","date":"March 17, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: \u00a0A writ petition was allowed by a Single Judge Bench comprising of Goutam Bhaduri, J., setting aside the order of the trial court which dismissed petitioners\u2019 application for amendment of the plaint. The petition was filed against the order passed by the trial court whereby the amendment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}