{"id":222322,"date":"2019-11-20T13:00:11","date_gmt":"2019-11-20T07:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222322"},"modified":"2019-11-25T12:41:27","modified_gmt":"2019-11-25T07:11:27","slug":"raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. dismissed the appeal filed by Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) challenging a judgment passed by the single judge of the present court.<\/p>\n

In the instant case, the respondent-writ petitioner was appointed in the service of the appellants as Conductor on 09-03-1984. He was dismissed from his service and the appellant-RSRTC was directed to substitute the penalty by compulsory retirement of the respondent with continuity of service and all the benefits, with payment of only 50% actual wages. After a lot of litigation, the respondent finally joined his duties but upon rejoining he was served with a charge sheet on 10-01-2000 alleging that he was absent from his duty. Earlier also a charge sheet was issued on the allegation that he too leave for somedays and cancelled the travel of the vehicle which caused loss of Rs 22,010 to the RSRTC. Another charge sheet was issued on 25-06-2003, alleging that when he was transferred to Hanumangarh from Kota, he did not report for the duty. A notice was served to him but he avoided it by giving the reason that he was undergoing treatment for back and spinal pain. An enquiry was conducted on the respondent for three different cases. After the enquiry was completed, the Chief Manager of the RSRTC passed a common order of penalty for removal of the respondent from service on 10-05-2006. This order was challenged by the respondent, but it was dismissed later with direction to the respondent to avail alternative remedy before the Labour Court under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Then the respondent preferred to a division bench, which set aside the order and remanded the matter back to the Single Bench to decide the writ petition afresh.<\/p>\n

Vinayak Joshi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants argued that the Single Judge had done a mistake of law by setting aside the order of removal of the respondent from the service. Illegality was observed by the Single Judge because a common order of penalty cannot be passed in three different charge sheets issued. The learned Single Judge did not analysis the order dated 10-05-2006 well.<\/p>\n

H.V. Nandwana, learned Amicus Curiae appearing on behalf of the respondent opposed the appeal and contended that the appellant-RSRTC had adopted Rajasthan Civil Services Rules, 1958 for the purpose of holding disciplinary proceedings against its employees. Relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mohd. Yunus Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh, <\/em>(2010) 10 SCC 539<\/a> the counsel submitted that the order passed by the disciplinary committee was vague and non-speaking one.<\/p>\n

The court upon perusal of the facts of the case stated that the court can exercise its power of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and interfere if the quantum of penalty is disproportionately given. Furthermore, it was held that the order of the Single Judge of this court is just, reasonable, and equitable. [Rajasthan State Road Corporation v. Suresh Agarwal, 2019 SCC OnLine Raj 3960<\/b><\/a>, decided on 04-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. dismissed the appeal filed by Rajasthan State Road <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[26804,3042,38399,38400],"class_list":["post-222322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-compulsory-retirement","tag-Judicial_Review","tag-quantum-of-penalty","tag-rajasthan-civil-services-rules-1958"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. dismissed the appeal filed by Rajasthan State Road\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-20T07:30:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-25T07:11:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-20T07:30:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-25T07:11:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: A Division Bench of Narendra Singh Dhaddha and Mohammad Rafiq, JJ. dismissed the appeal filed by Rajasthan State Road","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-20T07:30:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-25T07:11:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/","name":"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-20T07:30:11+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-25T07:11:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/20\/raj-hc-court-can-exercise-its-power-of-judicial-review-if-the-quantum-of-penalty-is-disproportionate\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Court can exercise its power of judicial review if the quantum of penalty is disproportionate"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":338220,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/31\/power-to-call-records-revise-penalty-order-after-consultation-with-psc-is-on-governor-discretion-sikkim-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222322,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Power to revise penalty after consultation with PSC is on Governor\u2019s discretion\u2019; Sikkim HC upholds order modifying penalty of dismissal from service to compulsory retirement","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Governor\u2019s failure to consult the Commission as envisaged in Rule 10 of Sikkim Government Servants\u2019 (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1985, while passing the order modifying the penalty, alone would not change the nature of the case.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sikkim High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Sikkim-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214638,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/raj-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-cannot-be-passed-as-shortcut-to-departmental-enquiry\/","url_meta":{"origin":222322,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC | Order of compulsory retirement cannot be passed as shortcut to departmental enquiry","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Arun Bhansali, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the petitioners against an order passed by Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institution Tribunal, Jaipur (the Tribunal). In the instant case, during the pendency of a charge sheet leveling four charges against the respondent, the petitioners passed a resolution inter\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264969,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/04\/acquittal-criminal-case-disciplinary-proceeding-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":222322,"position":2},"title":"Acquitted in the criminal case but employer still going ahead with the disciplinary proceeding? Read the law laid down by Supreme Court\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The purpose of a disciplinary proceeding by an employer is to enquire into an allegation of misconduct by an employee which results in a violation of the service rules governing the relationship of employment.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-118-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":357759,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/25\/karnataka-high-court-upholds-compulsory-retirement-of-senior-civil-judge\/","url_meta":{"origin":222322,"position":3},"title":"Karnataka High Court upholds compulsory retirement of Senior Civil Judge for threatening police officer with dire consequences","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Senior Civil Judge had allegedly threatened a police officer over a phone call in a complaint case filed against his sister.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Compulsory Retirement Senior Civil Judge","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Compulsory-Retirement-Senior-Civil-Judge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Compulsory-Retirement-Senior-Civil-Judge.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Compulsory-Retirement-Senior-Civil-Judge.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Compulsory-Retirement-Senior-Civil-Judge.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354137,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/22\/rajasthan-hc-termination-questionable-integrity-stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory\/","url_meta":{"origin":222322,"position":4},"title":"Order of termination on ground of questionable integrity is stigmatic; Holding enquiry mandatory: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"July 22, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the present case, since the petitioner was found involved in carrying passengers without tickets and the allegation was that his integrity is questionable, consequently, his services were terminated, therefore, the same can easily be termed as an \u201corder of termination\u201d having been passed with stigma\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Stigmatic order enquiry mandatory","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Stigmatic-order-enquiry-mandatory.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/16\/madras-hc-order-of-compulsory-retirement-is-neither-a-punishment-nor-a-stigma-and-principles-of-natural-justice-have-no-role-play-in-ordering-compulsory-retirement\/","url_meta":{"origin":222322,"position":5},"title":"Madras HC | Order of compulsory retirement is neither a punishment nor a stigma and principles of natural justice have no role play in ordering compulsory retirement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: The Division Bench of R. Subbhiah and T. Krishnavalli, JJ., dismissed a writ petition filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus. The present writ petition was filed by a former Chief Judicial Magistrate calling for records relating to the proceedings of the first and second\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222322"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222322\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222322"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222322"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}