{"id":222300,"date":"2019-11-19T16:00:20","date_gmt":"2019-11-19T10:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222300"},"modified":"2019-11-25T12:55:41","modified_gmt":"2019-11-25T07:25:41","slug":"raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>Sabina, J., dismissed the petition moved for dismissing the suit for partition qua the petitioner since no ground for interference was made out.<\/p>\n

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order passed by the trial court.<\/p>\n

The respondents had filed a suit for partition and cancellation of sale deed, challenging the Will executed by Bardi Bai.\u00a0 The petitioner moved an application before the trial court that the suit qua him be dismissed as he had purchased the property through registered sale deed from its owner Bardi Bai.<\/p>\n

The said application was dismissed by the trial court vide the impugned order after they observed that it was yet to be determined as to whether the property purchased by the petitioner was the ancestral property of Bardi Bai or it was an acquired property.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the said question was to be decided by the trial court after the parties led their evidence with respect to their pleas. The learned trial court had rightly dismissed the application moved by the petitioner. [Aamil Khan v. Shanti Bai, 2019 SCC OnLine Raj 4023<\/a>,<\/b>\u00a0decided on 14-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rajasthan High Court: Sabina, J., dismissed the petition moved for dismissing the suit for partition qua the petitioner since no ground for <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[15971,34779,38373,36937],"class_list":["post-222300","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquisition","tag-ancestral-property","tag-disputed","tag-ownership-of-property"],"yoast_head":"\nRaj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: Sabina, J., dismissed the petition moved for dismissing the suit for partition qua the petitioner since no ground for\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-19T10:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-25T07:25:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-19T10:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-25T07:25:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: Sabina, J., dismissed the petition moved for dismissing the suit for partition qua the petitioner since no ground for","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-19T10:30:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-25T07:25:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/","name":"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-19T10:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-25T07:25:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/19\/raj-hc-ownership-of-property-to-be-decided-on-evidence-where-mode-of-acquisition-is-disputed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Ownership of property to be decided on evidence where mode of acquisition is disputed\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326942,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/20\/mp-high-court-affirms-trial-courts-rejection-of-application-for-framing-additional-issues-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":222300,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Existing issues sufficient\u2019; MP High Court affirms trial court\u2019s rejection of application for framing additional issues","author":"Ritu","date":"July 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court noted that the additional issue which states that \u201cwhether the registered sale deed dated 13.7.2017 was illegally executed\u201d already covers all the ingredients which are necessary for execution of a valid sale deed.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358545,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/owner-entitled-to-return-of-original-documents-under-order-13-rule-9-cpc-telangana-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":222300,"position":1},"title":"Who is entitled to return of Original Documents, party who produced it or the owner? Telangana HC clarifies Order 13 Rule 9 CPC","author":"Editor","date":"September 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner had averred that the intent of Order 13 Rule 9 of the CPC is to ensure that documents, once they have served their purpose in litigation and are no longer required by the Court, should be returned to their rightful owners.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"return of original documents","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/return-of-original-documents.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219973,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/25\/pat-hc-act-of-entering-into-an-agreement-to-sell-with-another-vendee-prior-to-the-impugned-agreement-would-not-be-enough-to-prove-fraudulent-and-dishonest-intention-under-s-415-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":222300,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Act of entering into an agreement to sell with another vendee, prior to impugned agreement would not be enough to prove fraudulent and dishonest intention under S. 415 IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 25, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Birendra Kumar, J. allowed a petition since the entire factual position of the case, made out a case of a civil dispute only and because of that the criminal proceedings were to be quashed. An application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":317658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/18\/delhi-high-court-upholds-trial-court-order-dismissing-order7-rule11-application-due-procedural-considerations-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222300,"position":3},"title":"Issue of limitation cannot be decided without recording of evidence, once it becomes a mixed question of law and fact: Delhi High Court upholds Trial Court\u2019s dismissal of Order 7 Rule 11","author":"Arunima","date":"March 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court held that the dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was warranted, emphasizing the need to focus solely on the allegations in the plaint at the preliminary stage because the issues regarding limitation and adverse possession required further evidence and examination, which could\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/07\/orissa-hc-rejects-amendment-of-plaint-for-prayer-of-partition-in-27-years-old-dispute-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222300,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Proposed changes will expand ambit of Suit\u2019; Orissa HC rejects amendment of plaint for incorporation of prayer for partition in 27-years-old dispute","author":"Editor","date":"December 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe suit was instituted in 1996 and was at the fag end of the trial. The Defendant\u2019s cross-examination was ongoing and if the proposed amendment is allowed, it will change the nature and character of the suit.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":328949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/18\/sikmi-rights-supreme-court-directs-tehsildar-carry-out-measurement-of-disputed-property-maintains-status-quo\/","url_meta":{"origin":222300,"position":5},"title":"[Sikmi Rights] Supreme Court directs Tehsildar to carry out measurement of disputed property; Maintains status quo","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 18, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court clarified that if there is any attempt by the parties to obstruct the revenue authorities or the local police from complying with our directions, suitable action will be taken against them.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222300"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222300\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}