{"id":222245,"date":"2019-11-18T14:10:06","date_gmt":"2019-11-18T08:40:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222245"},"modified":"2019-11-20T13:20:00","modified_gmt":"2019-11-20T07:50:00","slug":"jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Jharkhand High Court: <\/strong>Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed the petition by asking the appropriate authority to look into the dispute among the office bearers of the organisation concerned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner sought for directions upon the Respondent 2 to take final decision upon the representation dated 08.03.2016 and grant licence to run Public Distribution System shop in the name of Sarda Mahila Mandal for village Patratu, Gola or in alternative to taking action against the wrongdoer, i.e. erstwhile Secretary Sabitri Devi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A license was granted in the name of Sarda Mahila Mandal, a group of women of self-help in which the respondents Sabitri Devi was the President while Koshil Devi was the Secretary and the respondent Basni Devi was the treasurer but due to internal dispute and allegations and counter-allegations, the licence has been cancelled by the competent authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Government, in order to provide food grain articles and other materials to be supplied under the control rate, came out with a decision sometime in the year 2006 to grant licence to group known as self-help group and in pursuance thereto, the petitioner Sarda Mahila Mandal, through its President, has made an application for grant of licence under PDS and taking into consideration the fulfillment of requirement as per the policy decision, the licence had been granted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that when there was internal dispute amongst the office bearers of the Sarda Mahila Mandal and considering the said circumstances, if the licence had been cancelled by the licensing authority, it cannot be said that any illegality had been committed, it is for the reason that the concept of extending the licence of Sarda Mahila Mandal for smooth distribution of food grain articles and more particularly to deal with situation of black marketing since the individuals in whose favour the licence was earlier been granted who indulged in case of black marketing having no control of anyone, save and except the raid and inspection if conducted by the inspecting authority, and if the licence would be granted in favour of a group, there would be check and balance amongst the members itself.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Keeping that fact into consideration, the Court, directed the Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh to look into the matter, so that people at large of the area who are getting food grain articles from the shop in question may not suffer and disposed of the petition. [Sarda Mahila Mandal v. State of Jharkhand, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VbH6pM54\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 1535<\/b><\/a>, decided on 13-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed the petition by asking the appropriate authority to look into the dispute among the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38356,30184,38357],"class_list":["post-222245","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cancellation-of-licence","tag-dispute","tag-officer-bearers"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed the petition by asking the appropriate authority to look into the dispute among the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-18T08:40:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-20T07:50:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-18T08:40:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-20T07:50:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed the petition by asking the appropriate authority to look into the dispute among the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-18T08:40:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-20T07:50:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/","name":"Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-18T08:40:06+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-20T07:50:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/18\/jhar-hc-dispute-among-office-bearers-of-mahila-mandal-not-illegality-for-canceling-its-license\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Dispute among office bearers of Mahila Mandal not illegality for cancelling its license"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":209774,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/02\/12\/pat-hc-distribution-of-money-among-office-bearers-of-ngo-purely-a-civil-dispute-criminal-proceedings-abusing-process-of-court-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":222245,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Distribution of money among office bearers of NGO purely a civil dispute; criminal proceedings abusing process of court quashed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: The Bench of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. hearing an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, quashed the cognizance taken against the petitioner holding that the subject dispute was purely a civil dispute. Chairman of an NGO named Bharat Bharati (Educational) Service Institution, instituted\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":224239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/15\/directions-under-s-35-a-read-with-s-56-of-the-banking-regulation-act-1949-kolikata-mahila-co-operative-bank-ltd-kolkata-west-bengal-extension-of-period-of-directions\/","url_meta":{"origin":222245,"position":1},"title":"Directions under S. 35 A read with S. 56 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 \u00a0\u2013 Kolikata Mahila Co-operative Bank Ltd., Kolkata &#8211; Extension of Period of Directions","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 15, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"The Reserve Bank of India, in public interest, had issued Directions to Kolikata Mahila Co-operative Bank Limited, Kolkata, West Bengal in exercise of its powers vested in it under Sub-Section (1) of Section 35 A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (AACS) from the close of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Business News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Business News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/business_news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/RBI-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":64111,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/26\/ban-prohibiting-women-from-entering-the-sanctum-sanctorum-of-the-haji-ali-dargah-held-unconstitutional\/","url_meta":{"origin":222245,"position":2},"title":"Ban prohibiting women from entering the sanctum sanctorum of the Haji Ali Dargah held unconstitutional","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 26, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: While dealing with petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India alleging gender discrimination and arbitrary denial of access to women in the sanctum sanctorum at the Haji Ali Dargah, the division bench comprising of V.M. Kanade and Revati Mohate Dere JJ., held the ban\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/21\/male-head-constable-enters-mahila-barrack-at-0015-hours-is-punishment-of-removal-from-service-too-harsh-sc-tells-what-makes-the-punishment-disproportionate\/","url_meta":{"origin":222245,"position":3},"title":"Male Head Constable enters Mahila Barrack at 00:15 hours; is punishment of removal from service too harsh? SC tells what makes the punishment disproportionate","author":"Editor","date":"May 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division Bench of M.R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., affirmed impugned judgment of the Gauhati High Court whereby the High Court had reversed the findings of the Single judge who had interfered with the order of disciplinary authority and remanded the matter for re-consideration. The Court held\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-182.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-182.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-182.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-182.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-182.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6678,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/07\/02\/role-of-alternate-dispute-resolution-mechanism-in-cases-of-rape-with-minors-in-india-discussed\/","url_meta":{"origin":222245,"position":4},"title":"Role of Alternate Dispute Resolution mechanism in cases of rape with minors in India, discussed","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 2, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court: Dealing with rationality of incorporating Alternate Dispute Resolution mechanism in cases of rape done on minors under Section 376 of the IPC, the single judge bench of P. Devadass, J. stressed on the need to enhance the role of mediation processes in criminal justice system in order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370717,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/24\/fox-mandal-karan-paul-arbitration-punjab-kings-ownership-dispute\/","url_meta":{"origin":222245,"position":5},"title":"Fox &amp; Mandal Represents Karan Paul in Punjab Kings Ownership Arbitration","author":"Editor","date":"December 24, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Fox & Mandal successfully represented Karan Paul before the Punjab & Haryana High Court in a high-profile arbitration concerning the Punjab Kings IPL franchise. The Court appointed Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu (Retd.) as sole arbitrator to adjudicate the chairmanship dispute in KPH Dream Cricket Private Limited, marking a key procedural\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Law Firms News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Law Firms News","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/law-firms-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Fox & Mandal Kings Eleven Punjab Arbitration","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Fox-Mandal-Kings-Eleven-Punjab-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Fox-Mandal-Kings-Eleven-Punjab-Arbitration.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Fox-Mandal-Kings-Eleven-Punjab-Arbitration.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Fox-Mandal-Kings-Eleven-Punjab-Arbitration.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222245","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222245"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222245\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222245"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222245"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}