{"id":222167,"date":"2019-11-15T16:42:04","date_gmt":"2019-11-15T11:12:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222167"},"modified":"2019-11-18T16:23:13","modified_gmt":"2019-11-18T10:53:13","slug":"sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/","title":{"rendered":"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and L. Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has refused to hold\u00a0 Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (Rent Act) merely because it grants a right to claim eviction for bona fide need by summary procedure to a certain group of landlords, that is, Non-Resident Indians subject to and on the satisfaction of statutory conditions which incorporate a check on frivolous evictions.<\/p>\n<p>The Court said that the plea that Section 13-B ought to be struck down on the ground that similar rights can be extended to other landlords was without substance, as<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cIt rests with the legislature to make laws and extend it to other similarly situated persons. The rent act(s) invariably give similar rights by a controlled mechanism and alluded riders to various other classes\/groups of landlords, namely, government servants, members of armed forces, the retired or soon to retire employees of the Central and the State Governments, widows, etc.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The Court, further, explained that <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>the right of Non-Resident Indians to initiate eviction under the summary procedure provided in Section 18-A of the Rent Act is not an unfettered and absolute right<\/em><\/span>. It is subject to satisfaction of various pre-requisites and imperatives that ensure and check potential abuse by resorting to a short-circuit procedure. The requirement should arise from a genuine need of the Non-Resident Indian landlord or his dependent. Such landlord should be an owner for five years preceding the date of filing of the eviction petition. There is a cap on permitting the use of the provision which is available only once in a lifetime and only in respect of one building. There are restrictions and constraints on the re-sale and re-letting and a further requirement to possess the property for a continuous period of three months after the possession is taken.<\/p>\n<p>It was, hence, noticed that the pre-conditions and post possession restrictions suggest that <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>Section 13-B serves a specific policy objective to ensure the right of Non-Resident Indians to occupy their property in the Union Territory of Chandigarh and the State of Punjab as the case may be, after \u201creturning\u201d to their country<\/em><\/span>. This right has to be balanced with the right of the tenants to establish their case on merits by disproving the genuine requirement of the Non-Resident Indians.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cSection 13-B cannot, therefore, be treated as an arbitrary classification that infringes and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>[Ram Krishan Grover v. Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/5q5tLs7Y\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine SC 1469<\/b><\/a>, decided on 14.11.2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and L. Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has refused to hold\u00a0 Section <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[4531,38318,38319,34457],"class_list":["post-222167","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-eviction","tag-landlord-tenant","tag-non-resident-indians","tag-rent"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and L. Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has refused to hold\u00a0 Section\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-15T11:12:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-18T10:53:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/\",\"name\":\"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-15T11:12:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-18T10:53:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949","og_description":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and L. Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ has refused to hold\u00a0 Section","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-15T11:12:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-18T10:53:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/","name":"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2019-11-15T11:12:04+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-18T10:53:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/sc-refuses-to-strike-down-provision-relating-to-an-nris-right-to-claim-eviction-under-the-east-punjab-urban-rent-restriction-act-1949\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC refuses to strike down provision relating to an NRI\u2019s right to claim eviction under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":222889,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/05\/constitutional-validity-of-the-punjab-religious-premises-and-land-eviction-and-rent-recovery-act-1997-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":222167,"position":0},"title":"Constitutional validity of the Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 upheld","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Upholding the constitutional validity of the Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997 a bench comprising of NV Ramana, Sanjiv Khanna and Krishna Murar, JJ held that separate classification of properties of religious institutions for rent legislation will pass the test under Article 14\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":360489,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/17\/ph-hc-considers-admitted-rate-of-rent-to-determine-tenants-arrears\/","url_meta":{"origin":222167,"position":1},"title":"Punjab and Haryana High Court upholds eviction petition; considers admitted rate of rent to determine tenant\u2019s arrears","author":"Editor","date":"September 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the demised premises had been taken for rent by the tenant at Rs 5500 per month in August 2003 with a 10% increase in the existing rent after every three years. The tenancy commenced in September 2004, and the tenant was stated to be in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"admitted rate of rent","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/admitted-rate-of-rent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/admitted-rate-of-rent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/admitted-rate-of-rent.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/admitted-rate-of-rent.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":222733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-november-2019\/","url_meta":{"origin":222167,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 November 2019","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"TOP STORIES Ayodhya Verdict| Here\u2019s why the 5-judge bench unanimously held that the disputed site belongs to Hindus The 5-judge bench finally put an end to the Ayodhya Title dispute and held that the disputed land is to be given to Trust for construction of Ram Mandir. In an effort\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304074,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/08\/sc-restrictions-imposed-on-landlords-rights-in-public-interest-are-not-unreasonable-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222167,"position":3},"title":"Never Reported Judgment| Restrictions imposed on landlord\u2019s rights in public interest are not unreasonable [(1952) 1 SCC 764]","author":"Editor","date":"October 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court's Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on West Bengal Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cases Reported&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"restriction landlords right public interest unreasonable","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/restriction-landlords-right-public-interest-unreasonable.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/restriction-landlords-right-public-interest-unreasonable.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/restriction-landlords-right-public-interest-unreasonable.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/restriction-landlords-right-public-interest-unreasonable.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255266,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/07\/the-model-tenancy-act-2021-a-step-forward\/","url_meta":{"origin":222167,"position":4},"title":"The Model Tenancy Act, 2021: A Step Forward","author":"Editor","date":"October 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Abhishek Gulatee[1]","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-122-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343765,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/17\/kerala-hc-upholds-rcaa-order-subsequent-events-negate-landlord-need-overturn-ev-eviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":222167,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Subsequent events must completely negate landlord&#8217;s genuine need, to overturn eviction order\u2019: Kerala HC upholds RCAA order granting possession to landlord","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 17, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The true test for assessing the impact of subsequent events on the landlord\u2019s bona fide need is whether those events completely eclipse the landlord\u2019s need. If not, the Court can proceed with the general rule that the situation at the commencement of the litigation governs the decision.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222167","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222167"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222167\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222167"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222167"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222167"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}