{"id":222116,"date":"2019-11-15T10:30:43","date_gmt":"2019-11-15T05:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222116"},"modified":"2019-11-18T16:13:43","modified_gmt":"2019-11-18T10:43:43","slug":"jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/strong> Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the applicant to challenge the decision of the Deputy Commissioner of Chatrahad who cancelled the jamabandi which was running in the name of the mother of the petitioner, Bigo Devi.<\/p>\n

The land in question had been acquired by the State of Jharkhand in favour of the CCL. The possession of the land too was transferred in favour of the CCL. The revenue authority, in consequence of the impact of the acquisition, had passed an order of cancellation of jamabandi in favour of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner was not found to be in possession of the landed property in question in a Mutation Case. The said order was affirmed by the appellate authority.<\/p>\n

The petitioner submitted that although the land had been acquired, there was no compensation paid in favour of the recorded raiyat or her legal heir (the petitioner). For the redressal of this grievance pertaining to the disbursement of compensation, another litigation was filed by them which is lying pending before the competent authority for its consideration. It was submitted that since the revenue authority had cancelled the jamabandi, it would create hindrance in deciding the entitlement of compensation in lieu of acquisition which is lying pending for its consideration.<\/p>\n

The defendant submitted that the petitioner cannot be said to have suffered from the impugned order because he was not in possession of the land in question in lieu of the acquisition of the said land by the State of Jharkhand in favour of the CCL and therefore, the jamabandi which was running in the name of the petitioner was rightly cancelled. Further, the entitlement of compensation had no nexus with the order passed by the revenue authority with respect to the creation of mutation because the creation of mutation or cancellation of jamabandi does not either create any right\/title or extinguish right and title over the property.<\/p>\n

The Court was of the view that since the petitioner was not in possession of the land in question, the running jamabandi in the name of the mother of the petitioner was rightly cancelled under the provision of Section 14 of the Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding (Maintenance of Record) Act, 1973 which states that only thing is to be seen for creation of mutation is possession over the land in question and since the petitioner was not in possession of the said land, the impugned order stood correct.<\/p>\n

The Court further held that, \u201capprehension is not well-founded in view of the fact that creation of mutation or its cancellation does not either create or extinguish any right over the property in question<\/em>.\u201d [Raghubir Tiwary v. State of Jharkhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 1508<\/a>,<\/b>\u00a0decided on 07-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the applicant to challenge the decision of the Deputy <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38300,38299,30456,2634],"class_list":["post-222116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bihar-tenants-holding-act","tag-jamabandi","tag-land","tag-possession"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the applicant to challenge the decision of the Deputy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-15T05:00:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-18T10:43:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-15T05:00:43+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-18T10:43:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition filed by the applicant to challenge the decision of the Deputy","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-15T05:00:43+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-18T10:43:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/","name":"Jhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-15T05:00:43+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-18T10:43:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/15\/jhar-hc-jamabandi-held-rightly-cancelled-under-s-14-of-bihar-tenants-holding-act-as-petitioner-did-not-have-possession-over-the-land\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | \u2018Jamabandi\u2019, held, rightly cancelled under S. 14 of Bihar Tenant\u2019s Holding Act as petitioner did not have possession over the land"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":325590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/03\/jharkhand-hc-directs-state-to-pay-rs-5-lakh-compensation-for-illegal-demolition-of-shops\/","url_meta":{"origin":222116,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Totally illegal, arbitrary and whimsical\u2019; Jharkhand HC directs State to pay Rs 5 lakh compensation for illegal demolition of shops","author":"Arushi","date":"July 3, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that even though the right to property is no longer a fundamental right and was never a natural right, it must be accepted that without the right to property, other rights become illusory.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jharkhand High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jharkhand-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":374339,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/01\/2026-scc-vol-1-part-3-latest-supreme-court-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":222116,"position":1},"title":"2026 SCC Vol. 1 Part 3","author":"Sonali Ahuja","date":"February 1, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"2026 SCC Vol. 1 Part 3: Explore the latest Supreme Court Cases on Constitution Law and Bihar Registration Rules.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"2026 SCC Vol. 1 Part 3","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/2026-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-3.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/2026-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-3.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/2026-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-3.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/2026-SCC-Vol.-1-Part-3.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":366239,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/11\/sc-quashes-bihar-rule-on-mutation-proof-for-property-registration\/","url_meta":{"origin":222116,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court quashes Bihar Rule mandating mutation proof for property registration; highlights deficiencies in land registration system","author":"Arushi","date":"November 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Technological advancement such as blockchain design could integrate cadastral maps, survey data, and revenue records into a single verifiable framework, which, while maintaining a transparent audit trail, is accessible to multiple departments and the public.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bihar Rule on mutation proof","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Bihar-Rule-on-mutation-proof.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Bihar-Rule-on-mutation-proof.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Bihar-Rule-on-mutation-proof.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Bihar-Rule-on-mutation-proof.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310919,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/07\/claim-of-adverse-possession-cannot-be-sustained-on-basis-of-discontinuous-irregular-acts-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222116,"position":3},"title":"Never Reported Judgment | Claim of adverse possession cannot be sustained on basis of discontinuous and irregular acts [(1952) 2 SCC 468]","author":"Simranjeet","date":"January 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"This report covers the Supreme Court\u2019s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1952 on claim of adverse possession.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"claim of adverse possession","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/claim-of-adverse-possession.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/claim-of-adverse-possession.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/claim-of-adverse-possession.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/claim-of-adverse-possession.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":271363,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/08\/possession-of-joint-land-by-one-co-owner-valid-in-absence-of-proof-showing-disagreement-between-other-co-owners-punjab-haryana-high-court-reiterates\/","url_meta":{"origin":222116,"position":4},"title":"Possession of joint land by one co-owner valid in absence of proof showing disagreement between other co-owners; Punjab & Haryana High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"August 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Manjari Nehru Kaul, J., while dealing with a revision petition for setting aside the order passed by the Civil Judge in Execution Petition held that the petitioner was unable to bring any material that showed that other co-owners were not agreeable to take possession. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Punjab and Haryana High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/punjab_and_haryana_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":355000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/jhar-hc-intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":222116,"position":5},"title":"Intra-court appeal not available to take new ground by making a totally new case: Jharkhand HC","author":"Editor","date":"July 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is settled position of law that if there is no pleading having been taken before the writ court, then it is not available for the party concerned to come out totally with the new case for the purpose of scrutinising the order passed by the Single Judge on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"intra-court appeal not available to make new case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/intra-court-appeal-not-available-to-make-new-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222116"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222116\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}