{"id":222114,"date":"2019-11-14T17:41:33","date_gmt":"2019-11-14T12:11:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222114"},"modified":"2019-11-18T16:24:34","modified_gmt":"2019-11-18T10:54:34","slug":"sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/","title":{"rendered":"Sikk HC | Prosecution&#8217;s failure to extract actual act in victim&#8217;s deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Sikkim High Court: <\/strong>A Division Bench comprising of Meenakshi Madan Rai and Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, JJ., while allowing an appeal, found error in trial court\u2019s decision of convicting the appellant under Section 375 of Penal Code, 1860, as none of the ingredients required for an offence to be established under Section 375 was satisfied.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Background of the case<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the present case, the mother of the victim filed an FIR against the appellant. Charge-Sheet against the appellant was under Section 376 of the Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Trial Court had framed charges against the appellant under Sections 5(l) and 5(k) punishable under Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 376(2)(n), 376(2)(i) and 376(2)(l) of the Penal Code, 1860.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Trial Court on considering the examination of the witnesses, convicted the appellant of offences under Section 376(2)(l) and 376(2)(n) punishable under Section 376(2) of the Penal Code, 1860 but acquitted him of the offences under Sections 5(l) and 5(k) of the POCSO Act, 2012 and 376(2)(i) of IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, on being dissatisfied with the finding the appellant approached the High Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Submissions of the appellant<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant assailed the impugned judgment on the grounds that although the victim alleged that he had sexually assaulted her on several occasions she did not complain of it either to her parents or anyone else.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The victim complained that the appellant used to frequently come to her home and sexually assault her when she was alone and she had narrated the incident to PW5 who however failed to endorse this evidence of PW9. Contrarily PW1 deposed that appellant told him that the victim had lured him to have sexual intercourse with her.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Even the minority of the victim stood unestablished and the trial court in the absence of any evidence opined that the victim was not a minor. Hence, the appellant be acquitted of the charges.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Submissions by Additional Public Prosecutor<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">He argued that although the prosecution had furnished the birth certificate of the victim before the trial court in the absence of supporting documents it was not considered. The said document was never contested by the appellant which therefore was an acceptance of the fact that the victim was a minor.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Relying only on the statement of the victim, it was contended that she has specifically stated that the Appellant had requested her to have sex with him holding out the promise that her deformities would be cured if she consented and acted on the consent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mother of the victim corroborated the evidence of PW9 as she had stated that on a relevant day, the victim came running to her and told that the appellant had entered the and forcibly laid her on the bed, taken off her lower garment and rubbed his penis on the vagina.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Hence it was stated that no error emanates in trial court\u2019s ruling.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Decision of the High Court<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court noted that the birth certificate was not contested by the appellant; the trial court chose to ignore it in the absence of supporting documents. Thus, it follows that the age of the victim has not been established.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Court also took note of the evidence of PW6 from which it was clear that the witness has not explained as to <em>whether the laxity of the hymen was a result of the occurrence of the alleged incidents or whether the hymen was lax prior to the incidents or for that matter whether medical science can at all point to the age of the laxity enabling the Court to draw a correct conclusion.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In absence of any categorical and cogent statement of PW6 in this context and in the absence of fresh injuries on the genital or person of the victim, medical report is of no assistance to the prosecution case and neither can the offence of the appellant be foisted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>What does Section 375 of Penal Code, 1860 say?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Appellant was convicted under Section 376(2)(n) and Section 376(2)(I) IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Offence of rape is described in Section 375 of the Penal Code which, inter alia, requires penetration of the perpetrator\u2019s penis to any extent, into the vagina, mouth, urethra or anus of the victim or he makes her do so with him or any other person or that he inserts, to any extent, any object or a part of the body, not being the penis, into the vagina, the urethra or anus of a woman or makes her to do so with him or any other person.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Rape would also occur if the accused manipulates any part of the body of a woman so as to cause penetration into the vagina, urethra, anus or any part of body of such woman or makes her to do so with him or any other person or the accused applies his mouth to the vagina, anus, urethra of a woman or makes her to do so with him or any other person.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">These acts must necessarily be against the will of the victim, sans her consent and if her consent is obtained by putting her in fear of death or hurt or any of the seven descriptions enumerated in Section 375 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Observation of the Court<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Victim had claimed that there was sexual assault and therefore Court cannot arrive at a hasty conclusion. It was imperative for the prosecution to have extracted from the victim during her deposition the actual act that was committed on her considering that the prosecution is under the mandate of proving its case beyond all reasonable doubt which means that it cannot leave its case to ambiguities thereby leading to erroneous conclusions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">All of the above-stated explains that the appellant does not satisfy the ingredients of Section 375 IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Thus, the Court was of the considered opinion that trial court erred in arriving at the finding and in High Court\u2019s opinion the offence is one under Section 354A (1)(i) IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The appeal is allowed to the extent above. [Tshering Tempa Sherpa v. State of Sikkim, <b><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/OKJYM4n8\">2019 SCC OnLine Sikk 188<\/a>,<\/b>\u00a0decided on 12-11-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sikkim High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Meenakshi Madan Rai and Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, JJ., while allowing an appeal, found error <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,31421,2572,38295,21112],"class_list":["post-222114","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012","tag-Rape","tag-section-354a-1i-ipc","tag-section-375-ipc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Sikk HC | Prosecution&#039;s failure to extract actual act in victim&#039;s deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sikk HC | Prosecution&#039;s failure to extract actual act in victim&#039;s deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sikkim High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Meenakshi Madan Rai and Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, JJ., while allowing an appeal, found error\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-14T12:11:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-18T10:54:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/\",\"name\":\"Sikk HC | Prosecution's failure to extract actual act in victim's deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-14T12:11:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-18T10:54:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sikk HC | Prosecution&#8217;s failure to extract actual act in victim&#8217;s deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sikk HC | Prosecution's failure to extract actual act in victim's deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sikk HC | Prosecution's failure to extract actual act in victim's deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC","og_description":"Sikkim High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Meenakshi Madan Rai and Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, JJ., while allowing an appeal, found error","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-14T12:11:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-18T10:54:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/High-Court-of-Sikkim.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/","name":"Sikk HC | Prosecution's failure to extract actual act in victim's deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-14T12:11:33+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-18T10:54:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/sikk-hc-prosecutions-failure-to-extract-actual-act-in-victims-deposition-results-in-alteration-of-conviction-for-rape-to-that-under-s-354-ipc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sikk HC | Prosecution&#8217;s failure to extract actual act in victim&#8217;s deposition results in alteration of conviction for rape to that under S. 354 IPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":264733,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/30\/rape-9\/","url_meta":{"origin":222114,"position":0},"title":"In view of changed definition of rape under S. 375 (b) of\u00a0 IPC pari materia to S. 3(b) of POCSO Act, whether sexual intercourse is necessary to attract ingredients of offence of rape or penetrative sexual assault? Chh HC elaborates","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: Addressing a case wherein a minor girl was subjected to sexual, Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J., held that, In view of the changed definition of rape under Section 375 (b) of the IPC pari materia to Section 3(b) of the POCSO Act, sexual intercourse is not necessary to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299543,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/rajasthan-hc-commutes-death-penalty-man-convicted-for-rape-and-murder-of-4-and-a-half-year-old-girl\/","url_meta":{"origin":222114,"position":1},"title":"Rajasthan High Court commutes death penalty of a man convicted for rape and murder of 4 and a half-year old girl","author":"Editor","date":"August 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Trial Court has rightly convicted the accused and we do not find any illegality in the impugned judgment of conviction and therefore, the same deserves to be upheld.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"rajasthan high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/rajasthan-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":293614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/01\/karnataka-high-court-recommends-central-government-make-law-on-necrophilia-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":222114,"position":2},"title":"Government should either amend S. 377 IPC or bring in a new provision to make Necrophilia and sadism punishable with life imprisonment: Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Holding that commission of rape on a woman's dead body would not attract Ss. 375 and 377, Penal Code, 1860, the Court pointed out that its high time for the Central Government to consider amending S. 377 or introduce a specific provision to address necrophilia, sadism.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"karnataka high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/15\/orissa-hc-set-aside-conviction-for-raping-minor-girl-and-convicts-for-aggravated-sexual-assault\/","url_meta":{"origin":222114,"position":3},"title":"Rape versus \u2018Aggravated sexual assault\u2019 under POCSO: Why Orissa HC set aside Trial Court order convicting Man for Rape","author":"Editor","date":"July 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court found that none of the acts of the convict would come within the definition of \u2018rape\u2019 under Section 375 of the IPC or \u2018penetrative sexual assault\u2019 under Section 3 of the POCSO Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"orissa high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/orissa-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327140,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/23\/meghalaya-hc-upholds-20-yrs-conviction-sexually-assaulting-minor-girlfriend\/","url_meta":{"origin":222114,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Love is blind but minor girl was made blind by intoxication to fulfil sexual desire\u2019; Meghalaya HC upholds 20 yrs conviction for sexually assaulting minor girlfriend","author":"Editor","date":"July 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the guise of loving the minor girl, the boy had poured some intoxicating substance in the tea which made the girl unconscious and had aggravated sexual intercourse with her.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230630,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/08\/sikk-hc-minor-school-girl-raped-and-sexually-assaulted-by-teacher-conviction-under-s-3762fi-and-n-of-penal-code-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":222114,"position":5},"title":"Sikk HC | Minor school girl raped and sexually assaulted by teacher; Conviction under S. 376(2)(f)(i) and (n) of Penal Code &#8212; upheld","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Sikkim High Court: A Division Bench of Meenakshi Madan Rai and Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, JJ. partly allowed the present appeal wherein a teacher sexually assaulted his minor students. Appellant was tried, convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for offences of rape, aggravated penetrative sexual assault and for assault on the minor\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222114","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222114"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222114\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}