{"id":222079,"date":"2019-11-14T10:30:50","date_gmt":"2019-11-14T05:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222079"},"modified":"2019-11-18T16:45:47","modified_gmt":"2019-11-18T11:15:47","slug":"raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/","title":{"rendered":"Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Rajasthan High Court: <\/strong>The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ and Mohammad Rafiq, J., dismissed a petition challenging an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>In the present case, the respondent was sanctioned one year of study leave from 01-10-2010 to 30-09-2011 for pursuing a two-year course in MBA on a regular basis. The duration of the course was two years and the respondent had applied for an extension of leave for another year. The leave was not extended by the applicant hence the respondent had to join the duties on 03-10-2011. The applicant-department thereafter had asked the respondent to submit the necessary documents for consideration of the leave extension which was thereafter rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court upon perusal of the records reiterated the decision of the Tribunal wherein it was stated <em>\u201cIn the present case, the applicant has furnished a certificate of satisfactory performance for one year of study which the respondents allowed him against the two year course. As such therefore, it would be manifestly unjust for any claim to be made to the effect that it was the applicant\u2019s fault that the did not complete the course when it is clear from the record and the admission of the respondents themselves that he was not granted the necessary extension of leave in order to do so. As the applicant did not overstay the period of leave granted in substantive terms and continues to serve with the respondents after rejoining duties, there appears to be no justification for visiting him with the recovery demand in question.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">High Court thereafter referred to the Rule 14 of the Study Leave Rules in the Indian Railway Establishment Code Volume-I, which provides for recovery in a situation where the applicant does not complete the course due to his\/her own fault whereas in the present case, the respondent was unable to pursue the course because of the applicant-department declining the extension.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Bench upheld the order passed by the respondent and dismissed the present application. [Union of India v. G.S. Rathore, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/24Oe9tI9\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Raj 3943<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ and Mohammad Rafiq, J., dismissed a petition challenging an order passed by <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[35692,38270,37830,38271],"class_list":["post-222079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-extension","tag-satisfactory-performance","tag-study-leave","tag-study-leave-rules-in-the-indian-railway-establishment-code-volume-i"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ and Mohammad Rafiq, J., dismissed a petition challenging an order passed by\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-14T05:00:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-18T11:15:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/\",\"name\":\"Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-14T05:00:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-18T11:15:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified","og_description":"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench of Indrajit Mahanty, CJ and Mohammad Rafiq, J., dismissed a petition challenging an order passed by","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-14T05:00:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-18T11:15:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3584-e1487939870879.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/","name":"Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-14T05:00:50+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-18T11:15:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/raj-hc-extension-of-study-leave-not-granted-despite-satisfactory-performance-of-candidate-held-to-be-unjustified\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raj HC | Extension of study leave not granted despite satisfactory performance of candidate held to be unjustified"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":320624,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/23\/woman-cant-be-denied-maternity-leave-during-her-probation-period-rules-maharashtra-administrative-tribunal\/","url_meta":{"origin":222079,"position":0},"title":"Maternity leave cannot be denied during probation period : Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal","author":"Editor","date":"April 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Period of probation should not be an obstacle in the seniority of a woman who wants to be a mother","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Maternity leave during probation","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Maternity-leave-during-probation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Maternity-leave-during-probation.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Maternity-leave-during-probation.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Maternity-leave-during-probation.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":375741,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/02\/16\/kerala-hc-maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves\/","url_meta":{"origin":222079,"position":1},"title":"Kerala High Court: Maternity leave is a right; cannot be clubbed with regular discretionary leaves","author":"Arushi","date":"February 16, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that extraordinary situations require extraordinary measures. In this unique case, where the petitioner had to avail both maternity and medical leave in the same year, the general rule of termination for exceeding one year\u2019s leave cannot be rigidly applied.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Maternity leave cannot be clubbed with regular leaves","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Maternity-leave-cannot-be-clubbed-with-regular-leaves.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":167524,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/11\/07\/biowatch-principle-applied-constitutional-matters-except-vexatious-litigations\/","url_meta":{"origin":222079,"position":2},"title":"Biowatch principle to be applied in all constitutional matters except vexatious litigations","author":"Saba","date":"November 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Constitutional Court of South Africa: A Constitutional Bench comprising of Nkabinde, ADCJ, Cameron, Froneman, Jafta, Khampepe, Madlanga, Mhlantla, Zondo, JJ along with Mojapelo and Pretorius AJJ, refused to grant leave to appeal against the order of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The applicant was an aspiring doctor seeking admission to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/Constitutional-Court-of-South-Africa.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":261338,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/08\/employer-setting-big-targets-not-granting-leave-and-not-accepting-resignation-would-be-acts-in-normal-course-of-business\/","url_meta":{"origin":222079,"position":3},"title":"Employer setting big targets, not granting leave and not accepting resignation would be acts in normal course of business: Bom HC grants anticipatory bail to employer accused of abetting suicide committed by employee","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 8, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Sarang V. Kotwal, J., addressed a matter wherein an employer was accused of abetting the suicide of an employee. The applicant sought anticipatory bail for offence registered under Sections 306 read with 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). First Information Report was lodged by the wife\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Bombay_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335625,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/20\/no-disciplinary-action-post-retirement-or-extended-service-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":222079,"position":4},"title":"No disciplinary action can be taken post-retirement or after extended service period of delinquent employee: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhere the disciplinary proceeding itself is without jurisdiction, upholding the same on the specious plea that it was not challenged on the ground of lack of jurisdiction would be tantamount to giving imprimatur to a patently illegal proceeding\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Disciplinary action after retirement","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Disciplinary-action-after-retirement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Disciplinary-action-after-retirement.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Disciplinary-action-after-retirement.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Disciplinary-action-after-retirement.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321951,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/13\/bhc-directs-aai-to-grant-maternity-benefits-to-employee-for-third-child-legal-news-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":222079,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Objective of AAI (Leave) Regulations, 2003 is not to curb population\u2019; Bombay HC directs AAI to grant maternity benefits to employee for third child","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The respect and protection of a woman and of maternity should be raised to the position of an inalienable social duty and should become one of the principles of human morality.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222079"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222079\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}