{"id":222075,"date":"2019-11-14T00:21:48","date_gmt":"2019-11-13T18:51:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222075"},"modified":"2019-11-14T18:19:47","modified_gmt":"2019-11-14T12:49:47","slug":"thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/","title":{"rendered":"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here&#8217;s why"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Supreme Court<\/strong>: On September 26, 2019, t<a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2018\/09\/27\/aadhar-act-2016-constitutional-not-violative-of-right-to-privacy-linking-of-aadha-with-mobile-phone-number-bank-account-not-mandatory-sc\/\">he 5-judge bench of former CJ Dipak Misra and A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan,\u00a0JJ, \u2018finally\u2019 put an end to the Aadhaar dilemma in a 4:1 verdict<\/a> and declared that the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 was valid and not violative of the fundamental right to privacy. The Court also held that Section 7 was the core provision of the Aadhaar Act and since it satisfied the condition of Article 110 of the Constitution, the Aadhaar Act was\u00a0validly passed as\u00a0<em style=\"font-weight: inherit;\">Money Bill<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Just over a year later, when another <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/breaking-rules-made-under-s-184-of-finance-act-struck-down-centre-to-make-new-rules-for-appointment-to-tribunals\/\">5-judge bench sat to decide the validity of Finance Act, 2017 as a Money Bill<\/a>, it realised that the Aadhaar issue might not just be over yet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The 5-judge Constitution Bench of Ranjan Goigoi, CJ and NV Ramana, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Deepak Gupta and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ went through the the judgment in\u00a0<em style=\"font-weight: inherit;\">K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (Aadhaar-5 Judge<\/em>),\u00a0<a style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/507jT8Z4\"><strong style=\"font-style: inherit;\">(2019) 1 SCC 1<\/strong><\/a> when both parties in the Finance Act validity case relied upon it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After \u201cextensively examining\u201d the issue, the Bench noticed that\u00a0<span style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; color: #ff0000;\"><em style=\"font-weight: inherit;\">the majority in K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5) pronounced the nature of the Aadhaar Act, 2016 without first delineating the scope of Article 110(1) and principles for interpretation or the repercussions of such process<\/em><\/span>. It, hence, said,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u201cIt is clear to us that the majority dictum in K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5) did not substantially discuss the effect of the word \u2018only\u2019 in Article 110(1) and offers little guidance on the repercussions of a finding when some of the provisions of an enactment passed as a \u201cMoney Bill\u201d do not conform to Article 110(1)(a) to (g).\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the Aadhaar-5 Verdict<strong>, <\/strong>referring to the definition of \u201cMoney Bill\u201d and the meaning and purpose of the word \u2018only\u2019 used in Article 110(1) of the Constitution, Ashok Bhushan, J. had observed that legislative intent was that the main and substantive provision of an enactment should only be any or all of the sub-clauses from (a) to (f). In the event the main or substantive provisions of the Act are not covered by sub-clauses (a) to (f), the bill cannot be said to be a \u201cMoney Bill\u201d. It was further observed that the use of the word \u2018only\u2019 in Article 110(1) has its purpose, which is clear restriction for a bill to be certified as a \u201cMoney Bill\u201d. It was, hence, observed that <em><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">the Aadhaar Act veers around the government\u2019s constitutional obligation to provide for subsidies, benefits and services to individuals and other provisions are only incidental provisions to the main provision. Therefore, the Aadhaar Bill was rightly certified by the Speaker as a \u201cMoney Bill<\/span>\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em>It is pertinent to note that Chandrachud, J was the lone dissenting judge in the 4:1 Aadhaar-5 verdict and he was also the part of the 5-judge bench that referred the issue of validity of Finance Act being passed as Money Bill to a 7-judge bench<\/em><\/span>. In his minority opinion in the Aadhaar-5 verdict, Chandrachud, J had, referring to the word \u2018only\u2019 in Article 110(1) of the Constitution, observed that the pith and substance doctrine which is applicable to legislative entries would not apply when deciding the question whether or not a particular bill is a \u201cMoney Bill\u201d. He had held,<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201cthe Money Bill must deal with the declaration of any expenditure to be charged on the Consolidated Fund of India (or increasing the amount of expenditure) and, therefore, Section 7 of the Aadhaar Act did not have the effect of making the bill a Money Bill as it did not declare the expenditure incurred on services, benefits or subsidies to be a charge on the Consolidated Fund of India.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Noticing that the majority judgment in<em style=\"font-weight: inherit;\">\u00a0K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5)<\/em>\u00a0did not elucidate and explain the scope and ambit of sub-clauses (a) to (f) to clause (1) of Article 110 of the Constitution, a legal position and facet which arises for consideration in the present case and assumes considerable importance, the Court, held<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; text-align: justify;\"><strong>\u201cGiven the various challenges made to the scope of judicial review and interpretative principles (or lack thereof) as adumbrated by the majority in K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5) and the substantial precedential impact of its analysis of the Aadhaar Act, 2016, it becomes essential to determine its correctness. Being a Bench of equal strength as that in K.S. Puttaswamy (Aadhaar-5), we accordingly direct that this batch of matters be placed before Hon\u2019ble the Chief Justice of India, on the administrative side, for consideration by a larger Bench.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">[Roger Mathew v. South India Bank Ltd.,\u00a0 <b><a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/K88NI5mE\">2019 SCC OnLine SC 1456<\/a>,<\/b>\u00a0decided on 13.11.2019]<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Read the full report on 2018 Aadhaar Judgment <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2018\/09\/27\/aadhar-act-2016-constitutional-not-violative-of-right-to-privacy-linking-of-aadha-with-mobile-phone-number-bank-account-not-mandatory-sc\/\">here<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Read the full report on the Finance Act judgment <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/breaking-rules-made-under-s-184-of-finance-act-struck-down-centre-to-make-new-rules-for-appointment-to-tribunals\/\">here<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court: On September 26, 2019, the 5-judge bench of former CJ Dipak Misra and A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y. Chandrachud <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":154914,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,38282],"tags":[12721,38269,38263,20601,29430,20611],"class_list":["post-222075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-decisions-of-the-constitution-benches-of-the-supreme-court","tag-7-judge-bench","tag-aadhaar-act","tag-appoinments","tag-finance-act","tag-money-bill","tag-tribunals"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here&#039;s why | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here&#039;s why\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court: On September 26, 2019, the 5-judge bench of former CJ Dipak Misra and A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y. Chandrachud\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-13T18:51:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-14T12:49:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"headline\":\"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here&#8217;s why\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-13T18:51:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-14T12:49:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":796,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"7-judge bench\",\"aadhaar Act\",\"Appoinments\",\"Finance Act\",\"Money Bill\",\"Tribunals\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court (Constitution\\\/Larger Benches)\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/\",\"name\":\"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here's why | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-13T18:51:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-14T12:49:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/11\\\/14\\\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here&#8217;s why\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_3\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here's why | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here's why","og_description":"Supreme Court: On September 26, 2019, the 5-judge bench of former CJ Dipak Misra and A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dr D.Y. Chandrachud","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-13T18:51:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-14T12:49:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/"},"author":{"name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"headline":"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here&#8217;s why","datePublished":"2019-11-13T18:51:48+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-14T12:49:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/"},"wordCount":796,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","keywords":["7-judge bench","aadhaar Act","Appoinments","Finance Act","Money Bill","Tribunals"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court (Constitution\/Larger Benches)"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/","name":"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here's why | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","datePublished":"2019-11-13T18:51:48+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-14T12:49:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/14\/thought-the-aadhaar-issue-was-over-with-k-s-puttaswamy-judgment-not-yet-heres-why\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Thought the Aadhaar issue was over with K.S. Puttaswamy judgment? Not yet. Here&#8217;s why"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6665f184a76dd0a4639fad050ee78a671e5bd5b4767e2cd8b57665c9461c34ed?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222075"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222075\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/154914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}