{"id":222011,"date":"2019-11-13T10:30:11","date_gmt":"2019-11-13T05:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=222011"},"modified":"2019-11-29T10:42:05","modified_gmt":"2019-11-29T05:12:05","slug":"pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Patna<\/strong><strong> High Court: <\/strong>Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner was not incarcerated when joining was offered.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was a Peon in the respondent bank. An FIR was lodged against the petitioner, his son and other family members alleging offences under Sections 304-B read with Section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860. The allegations led to the conviction of the petitioner. Later, the petitioner was granted bail and released from custody. He then submitted for his joining in the bank but was subsequently served with a notice of proposed punishment of dismissal by the respondent bank. The petitioner thus filed the instant proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">During the pendency of the instant writ proceeding, the petitioner was dismissed on account of his conviction in the criminal case by the bank in view of the provisions contained in the Regulations 39 and 40. The petitioner had preferred a criminal appeal against the conviction order and the impugned order was set aside but he had already crossed the age of retirement by then.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner in view of the developments during pendency had sought for quashing of the order dismissing him from service and also prayed that he may be granted benefits of payment of salary from the date on which he offered joining. The counsel\u00a0 \u00a0 Shashi Bhushan Kumar-Manglam representing the petitioner relied on the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of <em>Ranchhodji Chaturji<\/em> <em>Thakore v. Superintending Engineer, Gujarat Electricity Body,<\/em> <em>Himmat Narayan,<\/em>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/hd6H9SEr\">(1996) 11 SCC 603<\/a>, according to which the petitioner was entitled to grant of salary from the date on which he offered to join in the bank after his release on bail as thereafter he had been prevented from working by the authorities on account of their non acceptance of petitioner\u2019s joining.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Advocates Prabhakar Jha and Mukund Mohan Jha, representing the bank submitted that the scheme of the Regulations which governed terms and conditions of the petitioner\u2019s services make it abundantly clear that conviction by itself was a disqualification to continue in service. The mere fact of conviction was sufficient to dismiss an employee dispensing with the requirement of compliance with the principles of natural justice. He even referred to the same judgment relied on by petitioner&#8217;s Counsel to submit that it was only upon his acquittal in the criminal charges that the disqualification was removed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that such an offer of joining, post acquittal which if not acceded to by the respondent authority, may ensue to the petitioner to claim salary. The petitioner\u2019s status was of a convict at the time of submitting for joining and as such his claim for payment of salary for the period subsequent to such joining was not sustainable in the eyes of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was further held that there was no disqualification against the grant of post-retirement benefits as was available under the service regulation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above-noted facts, the instant petition was disposed of accordingly with the observation that the respondent Bank was to consider and dispose of the claim and pay the admissible dues within three months with regard to the retrial benefits of the petitioner. [Tarkeshwa Pandey v. Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, <b><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/G39rC8p2\">2019 SCC OnLine Pat 1924<\/a>,<\/b>\u00a0decided on 16-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court: Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner was not incarcerated when joining <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3468,2869,38249,11611,28954,38250],"class_list":["post-222011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-conviction","tag-disqualification","tag-post-retirement-benefits","tag-principles-of-natural-justice","tag-salary","tag-sections-304-b-read-with-section-34-of-the-penal-code"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court: Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner was not incarcerated when joining\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-13T05:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-29T05:12:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-13T05:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-29T05:12:05+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted","og_description":"Patna High Court: Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner was not incarcerated when joining","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-13T05:00:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-29T05:12:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/","name":"Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-13T05:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-29T05:12:05+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/13\/pat-hc-salary-not-to-be-granted-for-the-period-when-rejoining-of-services-was-offered-by-a-convicted-employee-when-he-was-out-on-bail-but-was-not-acquitted\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Salary not to be granted for period when rejoining of services was offered by a convicted employee when he was out on bail but was not acquitted"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":261409,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/kar-hc-bail-rejected-as-the-court-cannot-decide-whether-it-attracts-the-offence-under-ss-302-of-ipc-or-304-part-ii-ipc-at-this-stage\/","url_meta":{"origin":222011,"position":0},"title":"Kar HC | Bail rejected as the Court cannot decide whether it attracts the offence under Ss. 302 of IPC or 304 Part-II IPC at this stage","author":"Editor","date":"February 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: H.P Sandesh, J. rejected bail as at this stage no offence can be attracted and the same is left to trial. The factual matrix of the case is that on 20.09.2021, this petitioner assaulted his wife, when she victim was washing clothes. On account of injuries, she\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":273013,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/03\/delhi-high-court-denied-bail-rpf-constable-up-police-for-murder-lic-agent-interim-bail-different-from-regular-bail-indian-penal-code-legalnews-legalupdates-legalresearch-section302\/","url_meta":{"origin":222011,"position":1},"title":"Grant of interim bail does not obviate regular bail; Delhi High Court denies bail to UP Police official and RPF constable for committing murder of LIC agent","author":"Editor","date":"September 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In an application filed by the applicant who is a UP Police official, charged under Section 302, 120-B and 34 Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') seeking regular bail on the ground that the applicant was granted interim bail and never misused his liberty, Rajnish Bhatnagar J.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":350557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/13\/tel-hc-stays-conviction-g-janardhan-reddy-illegal-mining-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":222011,"position":2},"title":"Read why Telangana HC stayed Karnataka MLA G. Janardhan Reddy\u2019s conviction and granted bail in illegal mining case","author":"Editor","date":"June 13, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"This Court has the power to suspend the sentence and conviction and grant bail to the petitioner after recording reasons and this Court, being the appellate court, has to consider irreversible consequences.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Janardhan Reddy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Janardhan-Reddy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Janardhan-Reddy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Janardhan-Reddy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Janardhan-Reddy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214647,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/14\/kar-hc-anticipatory-bail-granted-in-the-interest-of-justice-to-appear-for-examination\/","url_meta":{"origin":222011,"position":3},"title":"Kar HC | Anticipatory bail granted in the interest of justice to appear for examination","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 14, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Bench of B.A. Patil, J., allowed an application for the anticipatory bail filed by an accused, an engineering student to appear for the examination. The petition was filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure to release him on anticipatory bail for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":223338,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/12\/17\/hp-hc-judicial-discretion-to-admit-petitioner-on-bail-in-the-event-of-arrest-exercised\/","url_meta":{"origin":222011,"position":4},"title":"HP HC | Judicial discretion to admit petitioner on bail, in the event of arrest, exercised","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J., addressed a bail application for release of the petitioner arrested under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the penal Code, 1860. The present application for bail states that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated. It has also\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257143,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/16\/bom-hc-discusses-law-where-accused-already-granted-bail-but-further-non-bailable-offences-are-added-by-prosecution\/","url_meta":{"origin":222011,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC discusses law where accused already granted bail but further non-bailable offences are added by prosecution. Read decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 16, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Sandeep K. Shinde, J., reiterated the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Pradip Ram v. State of Jharkhand, (2019) 17 SCC 326 wherein it was held: \u201cwhere the accused is bailed out under orders of the Court and new offences are added\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222011"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222011\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}