{"id":221845,"date":"2019-11-07T13:30:39","date_gmt":"2019-11-07T08:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221845"},"modified":"2019-11-13T14:21:03","modified_gmt":"2019-11-13T08:51:03","slug":"jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/","title":{"rendered":"Jhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:<\/b>\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioner sought for a direction upon the respondents to allot a shop situated at the Municipal Library in the name of the petitioner on the ground that he has been running the aforesaid shop since long.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The petitioner was not the allottee of the shop, rather, the shop was sublet in his favour by the original allottee. As the period of lease of the original allottee had expired, the petitioner handed over the keys of the shop with an application for consideration for allotment of the shop in his favour, but the shop was allotted to someone else. The petitioner argued that he was not allotted the shop as he was not deemed fit or proper since he was a handicapped person. The petitioner further submitted that he has been running the shop for long, and therefore priority ought to have been given by the respondents in allotment of the said shop. Counsel for the State submitted that the petitioner had no right to claim the allotment of the said shop since the said shop was never allotted in his favour, rather, he was tenant of the original allottee and after expiry of the lease in favour of the original allottee, the petitioner had no right to remain in the said premises. Furthermore, the order of allotment made in favour of the other person was never assailed.<\/p>\n

The Court heard both the parties and decided that the shop in question was never allotted in the favour of the petitioner, rather, he was claiming allotment of the said shop by virtue of the fact that he was in occupation by way of the tenant by the original allottee. The allotment of the shop by virtue of the expiry of the lease expired and therefore, the petitioner had no right to remain in possession of the said shop.\u00a0 <\/span>The petitioner had simply prayed in this writ petition for allotment of the said shop on the ground that he was handicapped and was running a shop in the said premises since long, but merely because the petitioner is handicapped, no sympathy could be shown by the Court ignoring the process of allotment of the shop. Also, the order of allotment was also never under challenge. The writ petition was dismissed. [Amarendra Kumar v. State of Jharkhand, 2019 SCC OnLine Jhar 1451<\/b><\/a>, decided on 18-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioner sought <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38187,38188,31370,38186,7871,38185,7921],"class_list":["post-221845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-allot-a-shop","tag-allottee","tag-article-226-of-constitution-of-india","tag-handicap","tag-lease","tag-sublet","tag-tenant"],"yoast_head":"\nJhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioner sought\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-07T08:00:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-13T08:51:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/\",\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-07T08:00:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-13T08:51:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question","og_description":"Jharkhand High Court:\u00a0Sujit Narayan Prasad, J. dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioner sought","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-07T08:00:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-13T08:51:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/Jharkhand-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/","name":"Jhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-07T08:00:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-13T08:51:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/07\/jhar-hc-courts-cannot-show-sympathy-on-mere-grounds-of-handicap-while-completely-ignoring-process-of-allotment-of-shop-in-question\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jhar HC | Courts cannot show sympathy on mere grounds of handicap while completely ignoring process of allotment of shop in question"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":283360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/07\/allahabad-high-court-no-cic-charges-can-be-demanded-from-the-company-if-there-is-merely-a-change-in-name-of-the-allottee-company-and-no-change-in-shareholding-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":221845,"position":0},"title":"Allahabad High Court| No CIC charges can be demanded from the company, if there is merely a change in name of the allottee company and no change in shareholding","author":"Editor","date":"February 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court held that the demand notice is illegal, as no CIC charges can be demanded from the petitioner company, if there is merely a change in the name of the original allottee\/leasee company and there is no change in the ownership or shareholding of the allottee company","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":306614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/06\/single-real-estate-allottee-cannot-trigger-insolvency-proceedings-under-section-7-of-ibc-nclat-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":221845,"position":1},"title":"Single Real Estate Allottee cannot trigger Insolvency Proceedings under Section 7 of IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"November 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The underlying claim of an aggrieved party, such as an allottee, is crystallized in the form of a court order or decree, and this does not alter or disturb their status as financial creditors.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327758,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/08\/01\/section-34-not-intended-to-be-used-as-tool-reappreciation-facts-dispute-dhc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":221845,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Section 34 of Arbitration Act cannot be used as tool for reappreciation of facts\u2019: Delhi HC","author":"Editor","date":"August 1, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 34, quite apart from its classically limited scope, is certainly not intended to be used as a tool for a litigant to desist from participating in the arbitral proceedings, despite being fully aware thereof, and, thereafter, seek a second bite at the arbitral cherry.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/29\/sourav-ganguly-illegal-allotment-plot\/","url_meta":{"origin":221845,"position":3},"title":"Did Sourav Ganguly play with the \u2018System\u2019? Cal HC pens down its decision in illegal allotment of plot to cricketer against State\u2019s land allotment policy","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 29, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Opining that \u201cprocess of applying the pick and choose a policy and making allotments at the whims and fancies of the persons in power continued in the State\u201d Division Bench of Rajesh Bindal, CJ and Arijit Banerjee, J., remarked that, \u201cIt is a fact that Sourav Ganguly\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243195,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/01\/ncdrc-if-there-is-no-express-provision-in-allotment-letter-and-sale-agreement-can-allottee-be-asked-to-pay-pending-dues-of-previous-allottee-commission-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":221845,"position":4},"title":"NCDRC | If there is no express provision in allotment letter and Sale agreement, can allottee be asked to pay pending electricity dues of previous allottee? Commission answers\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 1, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC): C. Viswanath (Presiding Member) addressed an issue wherein an allottee after the purchase of the Shed could not get electricity connected due to pending dues of the previous allottee. The instant revision was filed against the Order passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":108681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/22\/person-interested-in-the-matter-of-determination-of-compensation-under-la-act-does-not-include-post-acquisition-allottee\/","url_meta":{"origin":221845,"position":5},"title":"\u2018Person interested\u2019 in the matter of determination of compensation under LA Act does not include post-acquisition allottee","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"February 22, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Bench of A.K. Goel and U.U. Lalit, JJ held that a post-acquisition allottee of land is necessary or proper party or has any locus to be heard in the matter of determination of compensation under the scheme of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. In the present case,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221845\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}