{"id":221820,"date":"2019-11-06T15:00:04","date_gmt":"2019-11-06T09:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221820"},"modified":"2019-11-13T14:50:56","modified_gmt":"2019-11-13T09:20:56","slug":"kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/","title":{"rendered":"Kar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14"},"content":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court:<\/strong> A Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka, CJ, and Mohammad Nawaz, J. while allowing the State Government suggested the State Government to always exercise Regulation making power by incorporating a fair, transparent and reasonable procedure for allotment of the house\/sites in Board\/State Government quota.<\/p>\n

The petitioner had knocked the doors of this Court through this petition seeking for declaring certain portions of the Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations 1983 as amended by the Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) (Amendment) Regulations, 2017 as unconstitutional as it is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Regulation 4 and Regulation 9-A of the said Regulations were substituted by the amendment Regulations.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner, B. Vachan, contended that unguided and arbitrary discretion was conferred on the State Government to decide which applicants belong to the category of \u201cpersons in public life\u201d. The category of \u201cpersons in public life\u201d has been loosely defined which confers unguided and arbitrary discretion on the Government.<\/p>\n

Additional Government Advocate submitted that the explanation in both the Regulations is sufficient and there are safeguards that contain sufficient guidelines. The said Regulations have been framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 76 of the Karnataka Housing Board Act, 1962.<\/p>\n

As regards Regulation 4, in the discretionary quota of 10%, 25% of houses\/sites are reserved for disposal as a Board quota to \u201cpersons in public life\u201d and 25% of houses \/sites are reserved as a Government quota to \u201cpersons in public life\u201d. Under Regulation 9A, 10% of the stray houses\/sites are reserved as a Government quota for \u201cpersons in public life\u201d.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that there cannot be any policy, much less, a rational policy of allotting land on the basis of applications made by individuals, bodies, organizations or institutions dehors an invitation or advertisement by the State or its agency\/instrumentality.<\/p>\n

In the case of Meerut Development Authority v. Association of Management Studies<\/em>, (2009) 6 SCC 171<\/a>, it was propounded that \u201cdisposal of the public property by the State or its instrumentalities partakes the character of trust. The methods to be adopted for disposal of public property must be fair and transparent providing an opportunity to all the interested persons to participate in the process<\/em>.”<\/p>\n

Hence, the categories \u2018A\u2019 and \u2018C\u2019 in Regulation 4 and category \u2018C\u2019 in Regulation 9-A as well as explanation (a) to both Regulations were struck down being unconstitutional. [Bhojappa K. v. State of Karnataka, 2019 SCC OnLine Kar 1978<\/a>,<\/b>\u00a0decided on 18-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka, CJ, and Mohammad Nawaz, J. while allowing the State Government suggested the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33266,38261,17661],"class_list":["post-221820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-14-of-constitution-of-india","tag-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations","tag-quota"],"yoast_head":"\nKar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka, CJ, and Mohammad Nawaz, J. while allowing the State Government suggested the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-06T09:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-13T09:20:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/\",\"name\":\"Kar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-06T09:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-13T09:20:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14","og_description":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Abhay S. Oka, CJ, and Mohammad Nawaz, J. while allowing the State Government suggested the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-06T09:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-13T09:20:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/IMG_3499-e1487871967209.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/","name":"Kar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-06T09:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-13T09:20:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/06\/kar-hc-certain-portions-of-karnataka-housing-board-allotment-regulations-1983-held-unconstitutional-for-violation-of-art-14\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kar HC | Certain portions of Karnataka Housing Board (Allotment) Regulations, 1983, held unconstitutional for violation of Art. 14"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255813,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/19\/public-trust-doctrine\/","url_meta":{"origin":221820,"position":0},"title":"[Public Trust Doctrine] Kar HC | State largesse should not be marred by any arbitrariness while dealing with alienation of natural resources","author":"Editor","date":"October 19, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of Satish Chandra Sharma CJ and Sachin Shankar Magadum J allowed the petition, quashed the initial allotment of the site to respondent 3 and sets aside the allotment order made in favour of respondent 3. The facts of the case are such that PIL\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":369915,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/16\/ph-hc-sets-aside-rejection-of-flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers\/","url_meta":{"origin":221820,"position":1},"title":"‘Right to housing is a fundamental right’: Punjab and Haryana HC sets aside rejection of jhuggi dwellers’ claims under Small Flats Scheme, 2006","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In the case at hand, the Chandigarh Housing Board rejected jhuggi dwellers\u2019 claim for allotment of flat under the Chandigarh Small Flats Scheme, 2006 without giving them opportunity to be heard.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"flat allotment to jhuggi dwellers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/flat-allotment-to-jhuggi-dwellers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258632,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/17\/allotment-of-government-largesse-discretionary-quota-inevitably-leads-to-corruption-nepotism-and-favouritism-time-to-do-away-with-it-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":221820,"position":2},"title":"Allotment of Government Largesse| Discretionary quota inevitably leads to corruption, nepotism, favouritism. Time to do away with it: SC\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 17, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The allotment of plots in the discretionary quota cannot be at the whims of\u00a0the persons in power.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":228534,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/04\/21\/coronavirus-megh-hc-addresses-a-pil-with-regard-to-allotment-of-burial-cremation-ground-matter-listed-in-3-weeks\/","url_meta":{"origin":221820,"position":3},"title":"Coronavirus | Megh HC addresses a PIL with regard to allotment of burial\/cremation ground; Matter listed in 3 weeks","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of H.S. Thangkhiew and W. Diengdoh, JJ. addressed a PIL with regard to allotment of burial\/cremation ground. Petitioner filed the present Public Interest Litigation seeking direction to the State with regard to providing\/alloting land for cremation\/burial ground by assessing the need for various places of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":357722,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/08\/25\/bom-hc-dismisses-pil-on-midc-land-allotment-to-relatives-of-mlas\/","url_meta":{"origin":221820,"position":4},"title":"Bombay High Court refuses relief in PIL challenging allotment of land by MIDC at concessional rates & without following tender process","author":"Editor","date":"August 25, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn the present case, there is no challenge to Land Disposal Regulations, which empower Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) to make allotments by entertaining private applications.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"PIL on MIDC land allotment","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PIL-on-MIDC-land-allotment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PIL-on-MIDC-land-allotment.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PIL-on-MIDC-land-allotment.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/PIL-on-MIDC-land-allotment.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6249,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/07\/28\/university-grant-commission-institutions-deemed-to-be-universities-regulations-2010-held-unconstitutional\/","url_meta":{"origin":221820,"position":5},"title":"University Grant Commission (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations 2010 held unconstitutional","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 28, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: While deciding a case, where petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of University Grant Commission (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations 2010 (Regulations) on the ground that they are violative of Articles 19(1); (g) and 26 of the Constitution of India,\u00a0 the Court declared these regulations to be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "High Courts"","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221820\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}