{"id":221653,"date":"2019-11-01T16:31:24","date_gmt":"2019-11-01T11:01:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221653"},"modified":"2019-11-01T16:31:24","modified_gmt":"2019-11-01T11:01:24","slug":"supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>TOP NEWS<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/ayodhya-hearing-40-days-hearing-comes-to-an-end-verdict-reserved\/\">AYODHYA HEARING| 40-days hearing comes to an end; Verdict reserved<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court had, though, initially set October 18 as the deadline for completion of all arguments in the protracted land title dispute. If speculations are to be believed, the Ayodhya verdict will be out by mid-nov.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/cant-treat-all-of-them-as-a-liar-sc-while-partially-setting-aside-the-2018-sc-st-act-verdict-full-report\/\">\u201cCan\u2019t treat all of them as a liar\u201d: SC while partially setting aside the 2018 SC\/ST Act verdict<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The 3-jduge bench of Arun Mishra, MR Shah and BR Gavai, JJ has held that some portions of the verdict in <em>Dr Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra,\u00a0<a style=\"font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/trMkS1th\">2018 SCC OnLine SC 243<\/a> <\/em>were against the concept of protective discrimination in favour of down\u00adtrodden classes under Article 15(4) of the Constitution and also impermissible within the parameters laid down by this Court for exercise of powers under Article 142 of Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/25\/in-a-big-blow-to-the-telecom-sector-sc-refuses-to-change-agr-definition-full-report\/\">In a big blow to the Telecom Sector, SC refuses to change AGR definition<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The definition of revenue has been taken in a broad, comprehensive, and inclusive manner to pose fewer problems of interpretation, and exclusion of certain items was avoided.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/land-acquisition-hearing-justice-arun-mishra-refuses-to-recuse-says-his-conscience-is-clear\/\">Land Acquisition Hearing| Why Justice Arun Mishra said his recusal would be a grave blunder<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Recusal is not to be forced by any litigant to choose a Bench. It is for the Judge to decide to recuse. if he recuses, it will be a dereliction of duty, injustice to the system, and to other Judges who are or to adorn the Bench\/es in the future.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/22\/inx-media-casesc-grants-bail-to-p-chidambaram-full-report\/\">INX MEDIA CASE|SC grants bail to P. Chidambaram<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Being the Member of Parliament and a Senior Member of the Bar has strong roots in society and his passport having been surrendered and \u201clook out notice\u201d issued against him, there is no likelihood of his fleeing away from the country or his abscondence from the trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/sc-sets-aside-delhi-high-court-stay-on-proceedings-against-gautam-khaitan-under-black-money-act\/\">SC sets aside Delhi High Court stay on proceedings against Gautam Khaitan under Black Money Act<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Setting aside the Delhi High Court order any staying any action against Gautam Khaitan in a case relating to the \u00a0Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, the 3-judge bench of Arun Mishra, MR Shah and BR Gavai, JJ said that the interim order passed by the High Court is not sustainable in law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/01\/poll-affidavit-case-sc-quashes-clean-chit-maharashtra-cm-devendra-fadnavis-to-face-trial\/\">Poll Affidavit Case| SC quashes clean chit; Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis to face trial<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A contesting candidate is mandated to furnish information concerning the cases in which a Competent Court has taken cognizance along with the cases in which charges have been framed.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>MORE NEWS<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/aarey-forest-politics-forest-bench-to-hear-the-matter-on-oct-21-status-quo-to-be-maintained\/\">Aarey Forest Politics| Forest Bench to hear the matter on Oct 21; status quo to be maintained<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/06\/aarey-forest-politics-special-bench-to-hear-the-plea-against-felling-of-trees-tomorrow\/\">The Special Bench was constituted<\/a>\u00a0to hear the plea against the cutting of trees in Mumbai\u2019s Aarey colony for the city\u2019s metro rail project after a group of law students wrote to Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi seeking Supreme Court\u2019s intervention in the matter and the cutting of trees to be suspended immediately.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/09\/women-who-missed-2018-bihar-police-pet-due-to-pregnancy-should-be-considered-for-appointment\/\">Women who missed 2018 Bihar Police PET due to pregnancy should be considered for appointment<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was brought to the Court\u2019s notice that the total number of ladies who claimed extension of PET on the basis of pregnancy or injuries is stated to be 78 in all, out of which 73 are on account of pregnancy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/14\/online-rti-portal-sc-seeks-centres-response-on-pravasi-legal-cells-plea\/\">Online RTI Portal| SC seeks Centre\u2019s response on Pravasi Legal Cell\u2019s plea<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court has asked the Centre and State Governments to file reply on a plea seeking direction to establish Right to Information(RTI)\u00a0 web portals in all states to enable citizens, especially those living abroad, to file RTI\u00a0 applications online.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/15\/bhima-koregaon-case-sc-extends-gautam-navlakhas-interim-bail\/\">Bhima Koregaon case| SC extends Gautam Navlakha\u2019s interim bail<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The two-judge bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra allowed him to approach trial court for pre-arrest bail. Navlakha has to apply for pre-arrest bail in the meantime.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/18\/state-legislature-cannot-enact-a-law-providing-a-direct-appeal-to-the-supreme-court\/\">State Legislature cannot enact a law providing a direct appeal to the Supreme Court<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">State cannot enact a legislation providing an appeal directly to the Supreme Court. That would amount to entrenching upon the jurisdiction of the Union, which the State Legislature does not have.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/geomapping-is-the-answer-to-the-increasing-menace-of-illegal-construction\/\">Geomapping is the answer to the increasing menace of illegal construction<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Geomapping can be done by satellite, drones or vehicles. Once one has the whole city geomapped it would be easy to control illegal constructions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/18\/sc-quashes-trial-against-a-man-in-a-sexual-assault-case-of-a-6-year-old-heres-why\/\">SC quashes trial against a man in a sexual assault case of a 6-year-old<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The involvement of other persons on the statement of the child of impressionable age does not inspire confidence that the appellant is liable to be proceeded under Section 319 of the Code. In fact, it is suggestive role of the family which influences the mind of the child to indirectly implicate the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/18\/mere-change-of-address-in-it-return-is-not-enough-assessing-officer-must-be-specifically-intimated\/\">Mere change of address in IT return is not enough; Assessing Officer must be specifically intimated<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In absence of any specific intimation to the Assessing Officer with respect to change in address and\/or change in the name of the assessee, the Assessing Officer would be justified in sending the notice at the available address mentioned in the PAN database of the assessee, more particularly when the return has been filed under E\u00adModule scheme.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/18\/sc-transfers-assam-nrc-coordinator-prateek-hajela-to-mp-on-deputation\/\">SC transfers Assam NRC coordinator Prateek Hajela to MP on deputation<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court has ordered the transfer of Assam NRC coordinator, Prateek Hajela, to Madhya Pradesh on deputation. The bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, however, did not specify the reason, behind transferring Hajela to Madhya Pradesh.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>I<\/strong><strong>N OTHER NEWS<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.scconline.com\/post\/2019\/10\/29\/president-signs-a-warrant-appointing-justice-sharad-arvind-bobde-to-be-the-47th-chief-justice-of-india\/\">President signs a warrant appointing Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde to be the 47th Chief Justice of India<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TOP NEWS AYODHYA HEARING| 40-days hearing comes to an end; Verdict reserved The Court had, though, initially set October 18 as the <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":121,"featured_media":218562,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,34119],"tags":[33557],"class_list":["post-221653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-scmonthly","tag-monthly-roundup"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"TOP NEWS AYODHYA HEARING| 40-days hearing comes to an end; Verdict reserved The Court had, though, initially set October 18 as the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-01T11:01:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Prachi Bhardwaj\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-01T11:01:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg\",\"width\":1330,\"height\":887},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942\",\"name\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png\",\"caption\":\"Prachi Bhardwaj\"},\"description\":\"Senior Associate Editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019","og_description":"TOP NEWS AYODHYA HEARING| 40-days hearing comes to an end; Verdict reserved The Court had, though, initially set October 18 as the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-01T11:01:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Prachi Bhardwaj","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/","name":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-11-01T11:01:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","width":1330,"height":887},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/supreme-court-monthly-roundup-october-2019\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Monthly Roundup \u2013 October 2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/de579aff4bc6dd24b68d6d472ac92942","name":"Prachi Bhardwaj","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Prachi-Image2-150x150.png","caption":"Prachi Bhardwaj"},"description":"Senior Associate Editor","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_3\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/Supreme-Court_1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":220927,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/16\/ayodhya-hearing-40-days-hearing-comes-to-an-end-verdict-reserved\/","url_meta":{"origin":221653,"position":0},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| 40-days hearing comes to an end; Verdict reserved","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 16, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 40-days long Ayodhya title dispute hearing has finally come to an end today. The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has reserved it's verdict in one of the most controversial cases this country has seen.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220035,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/26\/ayodhya-hearing-wont-hear-the-matter-for-even-a-single-extra-day-after-october-18-sc-to-all-counsels\/","url_meta":{"origin":221653,"position":1},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| Won&#8217;t hear the matter for even a single extra day after October 18: SC to all counsels","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Indicating that judgment in Ayodhya dispute case is likely to be delivered before CJI Ranjan Gogoi's retirement in November, the 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has said that it cannot grant even a single extra\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219762,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/20\/ayodhya-hearing-sc-to-hear-the-matter-for-an-extra-hour-in-order-to-conclude-the-hearing-by-oct-18\/","url_meta":{"origin":221653,"position":2},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| SC to hear the matter for an extra hour in order to conclude the hearing by Oct 18","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 20, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ has decided to hear the Ayodhya land dispute case for an extra hour from next Monday in order to conclude the hearing before the October 18 deadline fixed by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221922,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/08\/ayodhya-verdict-cji-meets-up-chief-secretary-dgp-to-take-stock-of-law-and-order-situation-in-the-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":221653,"position":3},"title":"Ayodhya verdict| CJI meets UP Chief Secretary, DGP to take stock of law and order situation in the State","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Ahead of the impending verdict in the Ayodhya case, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi held a meeting on Friday with Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary Rajendra Kumar Tiwari and state DGP\u00a0Om Prakash Singh to take stock of law and order situation in the state, sources said. The officials\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220377,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/30\/ayodhya-hearing-we-dont-want-any-mediation-ram-lalla-virajmans-counsel\/","url_meta":{"origin":221653,"position":4},"title":"Ayodhya hearing| We don&#8217;t want any mediation: Ram Lalla Virajman&#8217;s counsel","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 30, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Ram Lalla Virajman, one of the parties in the Ayodhya title dispute case, on Monday told the Supreme Court that it does not want any mediation in the case. The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ and SA Bobde, Dr. DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, JJ\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":221929,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/08\/breaking-5-judge-bench-to-pronounce-ayodhya-verdict-tomorrow\/","url_meta":{"origin":221653,"position":5},"title":"BREAKING| 5-judge bench to pronounce Ayodhya verdict tomorrow","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 8, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: \u00a0The 5-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, CJ, S.A. Bobde, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ will deliver its verdict on the Ayodhya dispute on Saturday, ending decades of uncertainty ever since the Babri Mosque was demolished in 1992. The notice published on the Supreme\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/121"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221653"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221653\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/218562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}