{"id":221646,"date":"2019-11-01T16:00:55","date_gmt":"2019-11-01T10:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221646"},"modified":"2019-11-04T15:14:11","modified_gmt":"2019-11-04T09:44:11","slug":"pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court<\/strong>:<\/span>\u00a0Ashwani Kumar Singh, J., dismissed the application for quashing of FIR as the FIR clearly stated the incidence of tampering of the meter which would constitute a cognizable offence and hence the investigation is necessary.<\/p>\n

In the pertinent case, the petitioner filed the application for the quashing of an FIR registered under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. The Petitioner had, in spot billing of the month of December, 2017, an electric bill for an amount of Rs 1,55,089 showing meter reading as 27678 was issued. The consumption in two days was of 24110 units. Thereafter, he made a complaint on 12-02-2018 through the online portal of South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited. An electrician came and inspected the said meter was defective and would be reinstalled after repairing. Subsequently, he came back and reinstalled a meter. Thereafter, on 23-02-2018, some officials of the Electric Supply Sub- Division, Jamui came at his house and made an allegation that the petitioner had tampered the meter.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the opposite party contended that in the FIR, there is a specific allegation against the petitioner that on 23-02-2018, when the meter installed at the house of the petitioner was inspected, it was found that the body of the meter on the right side tampered and the seal was broken. Further, the meter number on the body and the screen did not match. It was also noticed that the past reading of the meter was reduced. They contended that the allegations made in the FIR clearly attract the ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that there is specific allegation in the <\/span>FIR<\/span> regarding tampering of the meter installed at the house of the petitioner. The seal of the meter was found broken. The aforesaid allegations are sufficient to attract the ingredients of the offence alleged, which is classified as a cognizable offence. In case of a cognizable offence, the police has a statutory right to investigate. Therefore, the Court held that neither the institution of the FIRnor its investigation can be held to be bad.\u00a0<\/span>[Bijay Kumar v. State of Bihar, 2019 SCC OnLine Pat 1870<\/b><\/a>, decided on 23-10-2019]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Patna High Court:\u00a0Ashwani Kumar Singh, J., dismissed the application for quashing of FIR as the FIR clearly stated the incidence of tampering <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33741,3067,38110],"class_list":["post-221646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cognizable-offence","tag-FIR","tag-incidence-of-tampering"],"yoast_head":"\nPat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court:\u00a0Ashwani Kumar Singh, J., dismissed the application for quashing of FIR as the FIR clearly stated the incidence of tampering\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-11-01T10:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-04T09:44:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-11-01T10:30:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-04T09:44:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act","og_description":"Patna High Court:\u00a0Ashwani Kumar Singh, J., dismissed the application for quashing of FIR as the FIR clearly stated the incidence of tampering","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-11-01T10:30:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-04T09:44:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/","name":"Pat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-11-01T10:30:55+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-04T09:44:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/11\/01\/pat-hc-quashing-of-fir-denied-as-tampering-with-meter-installed-at-house-is-cognizable-offence-under-s-135-of-electricity-act\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Quashing of FIR denied as tampering with meter installed at house is cognizable offence under S. 135 of Electricity Act"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":207473,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/01\/offence-under-section-135-of-electricity-act-not-a-dispute-private-in-nature-quashing-of-fir-would-be-misplaced-sympathy-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":221646,"position":0},"title":"Offence under Section 135 of Electricity Act not a dispute private in nature; quashing of FIR would be misplaced sympathy: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Single Judge Bench comprising of R.K. Gauba, J. declined to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR registered against the petitioner. The petitioner was facing criminal prosecution under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner who was represented by V.K. Sharma, Advocate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":215818,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/17\/utt-hc-fir-when-states-commission-of-cognizable-offence-court-not-to-presume-story-of-prosecution-not-believable-in-absence-of-any-material-to-the-contrary\/","url_meta":{"origin":221646,"position":1},"title":"Utt HC | FIR when states commission of cognizable offence, Court not to presume story of prosecution not believable in absence of any material to the contrary","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: The instant petition was entertained by Ravindra Maithani, J. where the petitioner under Section 482 CrPC applied for quashing of the chargesheet and impugned cognizance order for offence under Section 420 IPC, which was pending before Civil Judge.\u00a0 Petitioner had stated that an FIR was lodged in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":217944,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/12\/pat-hc-court-reiterates-that-it-has-no-role-to-play-while-investigation-by-police-is-still-underway\/","url_meta":{"origin":221646,"position":2},"title":"Pat HC | Court reiterates that it has no role to play while investigation by police is still underway","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 12, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Ashwani Kumar Singh, J. dismissed an application for the quashing of FIR by the petitioner under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. An FIR was registered under Section 366 read with Section 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 against the petitioner where it was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":282054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/wife-infertility-husband-mutual-divorce-fir-cruelty-calcutta-high-court-revision-petition-quash-fir-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":221646,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Infertility cannot be a ground for divorce","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Dismissing the revision petition filed for quashing of FIR and criminal proceeding against the petitioner\/husband, the Court held that prima facie case of a cognizable offence of cruelty can be make out against the petitioner\/husband therefore inherit power of High Court under S. 482 CrPC cannot be exercised.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":216272,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/29\/pat-hc-no-cognizable-offence-disclosed-in-fir-though-the-apparent-allegation-of-embezzlement-of-money-held-to-be-a-legitimate-ground-for-proceeding-trial\/","url_meta":{"origin":221646,"position":4},"title":"Pat HC | No cognizable offence disclosed in FIR though the apparent allegation of embezzlement of money held to be a legitimate ground for proceeding trial\u00a0","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: Birendra Kumar, J. dismissed a criminal miscellaneous application filed by the petitioner challenging the order of cognizance passed against him under various Sections of IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.\u00a0 In the instant petition the accused in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case of 2013 registered under\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":248770,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/26\/no-coercive-measures-to-be-taken-can-high-courts-pass-such-blanket-orders-while-refusing-to-quash-investigation-heres-the-law-laid-down-by-the-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":221646,"position":5},"title":"\u201cNo coercive measures to be taken\u201d| Can High Courts pass such blanket orders while refusing to quash investigation? Here’s the law laid down by the Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Granting of such blanket order would not only adversely affect the investigation but would have far reaching implications for maintaining the Rule of Law.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221646\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}