{"id":221629,"date":"2019-10-31T17:30:55","date_gmt":"2019-10-31T12:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221629"},"modified":"2019-11-02T12:36:01","modified_gmt":"2019-11-02T07:06:01","slug":"jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/","title":{"rendered":"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir <\/span><\/span>High Court:<\/span><\/span><\/strong> Tashi Rabstan<\/span><\/span>, J.<\/span><\/span> upheld <\/span><\/span>the finding of <\/span><\/span>the revisional court as it was found to be <\/span><\/span>well reasoned and <\/span><\/span>no <\/span><\/span>abuse<\/span><\/span> of <\/span><\/span>process of law <\/span><\/span>was visible, <\/span><\/span>warra<\/span><\/span>nting any interference from the instant<\/span><\/span> Court<\/span><\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The petitioner <\/span><\/span>filed <\/span><\/span>the instant petition <\/span><\/span>under Section 561-A of <\/span><\/span>the Code of Criminal Procedure (\u201c<\/span><\/span>Cr.P.C<\/span><\/span>\u201d) <\/span><\/span>for setting aside the order passed<\/span><\/span> by learned Additional Sessions <\/span><\/span>Judge, Jammu whereby the order, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Munsiff) Jammu di<\/span><\/span>scharging the petitioners<\/span><\/span> from the offences mentioned in the Challan against them by the prosecution was set aside.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

It was contended by the petitioners that they were being <\/span><\/span>falsely implicated in the FIR by <\/span><\/span>to satisfy a personal vendetta. <\/span><\/span>The <\/span><\/span>material collected by the prose<\/span><\/span>cution during the investigation did<\/span><\/span> not support the prosecution<\/span><\/span>\u2019s<\/span><\/span> case in the framing of charges under Sections <\/span><\/span>498-A, 323, 504, 506, 109 of the Ranbir Penal Code<\/span><\/span> as the petitioners No. 3 and 4 we<\/span><\/span>re not relat<\/span><\/span>ed to the husband of the<\/span><\/span> respondent<\/span><\/span> so as<\/span><\/span> to constitute the offence under Section 498-A RPC.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The counsel for the respondents while trying to defend the <\/span><\/span>Trial Magistrate <\/span><\/span>submitted that the court <\/span><\/span>could not have sifted the evidence placed before it or appreciated the evidence intrinsically at the stage of framing of charge, which was to be considered final. <\/span><\/span>It was further submitted that the <\/span><\/span>allegations in FIR and statements recorded under Section 161 of CrPC prima facie established the offen<\/span><\/span>ces with which the petitioners we<\/span><\/span>re challaned and were required to be put on trial by <\/span><\/span>framing the charge against them<\/span><\/span>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

On p<\/span><\/span>erusal of <\/span><\/span>the <\/span><\/span>challan filed after the complete investigation, <\/span><\/span>it was found <\/span><\/span>that statements of nine witnesses recorded under<\/span><\/span> Section 161 CrPC corroborated<\/span><\/span> the allegations leveled against the petitioners in <\/span><\/span>the <\/span><\/span>FIR.<\/span><\/span> The <\/span><\/span>learned <\/span><\/span>Trial <\/span><\/span>Magistrate <\/span><\/span>had<\/span><\/span> appreciated the evidence including <\/span><\/span>the <\/span><\/span>medical report of i<\/span><\/span>njuries sustained by the respondent as if she was considering the case either to convict or acquit the acc<\/span><\/span>used. The learned Magistrate had observed that petitioner\u2019s 3 and 4 we<\/span><\/span>re not related to the husband of the respondent, therefore, the offen<\/span><\/span>ce under Section 498-A RPC were <\/span><\/span>not made<\/span><\/span> out against them, which was required to proved\/disproved by leading evidence and not a mere prima facie<\/span><\/span> case. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The court held that a<\/span><\/span>t the time <\/span><\/span>of framing charge, the court had<\/span><\/span> to consider the final investigation report, statement of witnesses under Section 161 CrPC, documents and other evidence addu<\/span><\/span>ced by the prosecution and if they saw<\/span><\/span> that the allegatio<\/span><\/span>ns were groundless and no case was <\/span><\/span>made out against the accused, that is, if<\/span><\/span> it was<\/span><\/span> unrebutted<\/span><\/span>,<\/span><\/span> it would not <\/span><\/span>have <\/span><\/span>warrant<\/span><\/span>ed a conviction, <\/span><\/span>however, if <\/span><\/span>there were even probable chances of commission<\/span><\/span> of offence by accused persons the court needs to frame<\/span><\/span> charge<\/span><\/span>s. All this had<\/span><\/span> to be done by prima face appreciation of material on record and not by <\/span><\/span>a <\/span><\/span>roving enquiry by scanning and evaluat<\/span><\/span>ing the evidence as if the court had to decide whether the accused had<\/span><\/span> committed the offence or not.<\/span><\/span> For such limited purposes of <\/span><\/span>prima facie<\/span><\/span> satisfaction, the court may sift<\/span><\/span> through<\/span><\/span> the evidence produced by <\/span><\/span>the <\/span><\/span>prosecution to find out whether the ingredients of offences <\/span><\/span>were satisfied or not a conduct<\/span><\/span> a mini-trial by marshaling the evidence on record. \u00a0<\/span><\/span>[<\/span><\/span>Tamandeep Singh v. State of J&K<\/span><\/span>,\u00a02019 SCC OnLine J&K 855<\/b><\/a><\/span><\/span>, decided on 25-10<\/span><\/span>-2019]<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J. upheld the finding of the revisional court as it was found to be well <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6431,38123,31638],"class_list":["post-221629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-beyond-reasonable-doubt","tag-prima-facie-evidence","tag-section-161-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nJ&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J. upheld the finding of the revisional court as it was found to be well\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-31T12:00:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-02T07:06:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-31T12:00:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-02T07:06:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":590,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"beyond reasonable doubt\",\"Prima Facie Evidence\",\"Section 161 CrPC\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/\",\"name\":\"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-31T12:00:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-02T07:06:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same","og_description":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: Tashi Rabstan, J. upheld the finding of the revisional court as it was found to be well","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-31T12:00:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-02T07:06:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/JK-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same","datePublished":"2019-10-31T12:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-02T07:06:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/"},"wordCount":590,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["beyond reasonable doubt","Prima Facie Evidence","Section 161 CrPC"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/","name":"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-31T12:00:55+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-02T07:06:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/jk-hc-prima-facie-evidence-enough-for-framing-of-charges-evidence-beyond-reasonable-doubt-is-not-required-for-same\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"J&K HC | Prima facie evidence enough for framing of charges, evidence beyond reasonable doubt is not required for same"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221629"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221629\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}