{"id":221627,"date":"2019-10-31T16:30:34","date_gmt":"2019-10-31T11:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221627"},"modified":"2019-11-04T14:51:07","modified_gmt":"2019-11-04T09:21:07","slug":"ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","title":{"rendered":"P&#038;H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"s3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Punjab and Haryana H<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">igh <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">C<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">ourt<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s2\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">: <\/span><\/span><\/strong><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ.<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">dismissed<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> the review <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">application filed by a person against the order passed by the State of Punjab<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> regarding the <em>inter se<\/em> merit of sportspersons.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"s3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">An <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">order<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">was issued <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">by the State of Punjab<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">giving directions for reservations of sportspersons<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">;<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> a<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">gainst which the petitioner had filed a case stating that w<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">hile deciding the <em>inter se<\/em> merit<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> of the students with the same sports gradation, me<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">rit was<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> being<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> ignored. The Court <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">held that the <em>inter se<\/em> merit of candidates within the same sports gradation has to be determined on the basis of merit.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> However<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">,<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> t<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">he State of Punjab sought Special Leave <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">to Appeal.<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">In the SLP, it was <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">d<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">irected by the Supreme Court that counseling would take place<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> as per the order passed by the High Court.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> Meanwhile, a<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> revised merit list was uploaded in which the merit posit<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">ions of candidates were lowered<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">. <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Thus, the instant <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">review application <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">was filed.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"s3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">In reply to the review application, the <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">State of Punjab <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">submitted<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> that the <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">merit list was governed by Clause 6 of the Sports Gradation P<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">olicy dated 10-12-1997.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"s3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">B.S.Patwalia<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">,<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> learned counsel for the non-applicant petitioner<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">,<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> argued that the review application <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">was<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> not maintainable as <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">a <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">petition<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> see<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">king Special Leave to Appeal was<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> pending before the Supreme Court.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> Whereas\u00a0<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Gurminder Singh, learned senior counsel for the review applicants<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">,<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> stated that<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> the pendency of SLP<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> d<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">id<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> not bar this court from exercising its review jurisdic<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">tion because the subject matter<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">in both the matters was<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> different.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"s3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">The Court held that the pendency of such<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">SLP<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> does not <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">attract\u00a0<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">the doctrine of merger.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> Even if, the SLP is dismissed by passing a speaking order, the doctrine of merger is not attracted. <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">It relied on<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">the judgment in <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s5\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">K<em>hoday Distilleries Ltd<\/em><\/span><\/span><em><span class=\"s5\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">. v. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s5\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> Sakkare Karkhane Ltd.<\/span><\/span><\/em><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/90mxG1mN\">(2019) 4 SCC 376<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">to hold that <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">a High Court can exercise review jurisdict<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">ion during the pendency of an SLP<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"s3\" style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">However, <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">it was opined that <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">the counseling order passed by the Supreme Court <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">could not <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">be ignored<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">. <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Relying on<\/span><\/span> <em><span class=\"s5\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">Abbai Maligai<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s5\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> Partnership F<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s5\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">irm v. K. Santhakumaran<\/span><\/span><\/em><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/58LcV8kb\">(1998) 7 SCC 386<\/a><\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">, the <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">C<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">ourt <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">refrained from passing<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\"> any order contrary to the d<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">irections of the Supreme Court and directed <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">the applicants to seek clarification from the Supreme Court. <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">[Rimnaaz v. State of Punjab,\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/vd00XaNe\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 1704<\/b><\/a><\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">, <\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">decided on 06-09-2019<\/span><\/span><span class=\"s4\"><span class=\"bumpedFont15\">]<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ. dismissed the review application filed by a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38121,38120,38122],"class_list":["post-221627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-pendency-of-slp","tag-review-jurisdiction","tag-sports-gradation-policy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P&amp;H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order) | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&amp;H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ. dismissed the review application filed by a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"headline\":\"P&#038;H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":432,\"commentCount\":1,\"keywords\":[\"Pendency of SLP\",\"Review Jurisdiction\",\"Sports Gradation Policy\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order) | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2019\\\/10\\\/31\\\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&#038;H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_1\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order) | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ. dismissed the review application filed by a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/"},"author":{"name":"Bhumika Indulia","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"headline":"P&#038;H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)","datePublished":"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/"},"wordCount":432,"commentCount":1,"keywords":["Pendency of SLP","Review Jurisdiction","Sports Gradation Policy"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","name":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order) | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&#038;H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/84c1b51748d0297cf12e5a898eccb7bd3eb5f0ab4ae8e275e2e65c4c83f84740?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221627\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}