{"id":221627,"date":"2019-10-31T16:30:34","date_gmt":"2019-10-31T11:00:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221627"},"modified":"2019-11-04T14:51:07","modified_gmt":"2019-11-04T09:21:07","slug":"ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","title":{"rendered":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana H<\/span><\/span>igh <\/span><\/span>C<\/span><\/span>ourt<\/span><\/span>: <\/span><\/span><\/strong>A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ.<\/span><\/span> dismissed<\/span><\/span> the review <\/span><\/span>application filed by a person against the order passed by the State of Punjab<\/span><\/span> regarding the inter se<\/em> merit of sportspersons.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

An <\/span><\/span>order<\/span><\/span> was issued <\/span><\/span>by the State of Punjab<\/span><\/span> giving directions for reservations of sportspersons<\/span><\/span>;<\/span><\/span> a<\/span><\/span>gainst which the petitioner had filed a case stating that w<\/span><\/span>hile deciding the inter se<\/em> merit<\/span><\/span> of the students with the same sports gradation, me<\/span><\/span>rit was<\/span><\/span> being<\/span><\/span> ignored. The Court <\/span><\/span>held that the inter se<\/em> merit of candidates within the same sports gradation has to be determined on the basis of merit.<\/span><\/span> However<\/span><\/span>,<\/span><\/span> t<\/span><\/span>he State of Punjab sought Special Leave <\/span><\/span>to Appeal.<\/span><\/span> In the SLP, it was <\/span><\/span>d<\/span><\/span>irected by the Supreme Court that counseling would take place<\/span><\/span> as per the order passed by the High Court.<\/span><\/span> Meanwhile, a<\/span><\/span> revised merit list was uploaded in which the merit posit<\/span><\/span>ions of candidates were lowered<\/span><\/span>. <\/span><\/span>Thus, the instant <\/span><\/span>review application <\/span><\/span>was filed.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In reply to the review application, the <\/span><\/span>State of Punjab <\/span><\/span>submitted<\/span><\/span> that the <\/span><\/span>merit list was governed by Clause 6 of the Sports Gradation P<\/span><\/span>olicy dated 10-12-1997.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

B.S.Patwalia<\/span><\/span>,<\/span><\/span> learned counsel for the non-applicant petitioner<\/span><\/span>,<\/span><\/span> argued that the review application <\/span><\/span>was<\/span><\/span> not maintainable as <\/span><\/span>a <\/span><\/span>petition<\/span><\/span> see<\/span><\/span>king Special Leave to Appeal was<\/span><\/span> pending before the Supreme Court.<\/span><\/span> Whereas\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Gurminder Singh, learned senior counsel for the review applicants<\/span><\/span>,<\/span><\/span> stated that<\/span><\/span> the pendency of SLP<\/span><\/span> d<\/span><\/span>id<\/span><\/span> not bar this court from exercising its review jurisdic<\/span><\/span>tion because the subject matter<\/span><\/span> in both the matters was<\/span><\/span> different.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Court held that the pendency of such<\/span><\/span> SLP<\/span><\/span> does not <\/span><\/span>attract\u00a0<\/span><\/span>the doctrine of merger.<\/span><\/span> Even if, the SLP is dismissed by passing a speaking order, the doctrine of merger is not attracted. <\/span><\/span>It relied on<\/span><\/span> the judgment in <\/span><\/span>Khoday Distilleries Ltd<\/em><\/span><\/span>. v. Sri Mahadeshwara Sahakara<\/span><\/span> Sakkare Karkhane Ltd.<\/span><\/span><\/em>, (2019) 4 SCC 376<\/a><\/span><\/span>\u00a0to hold that <\/span><\/span>a High Court can exercise review jurisdict<\/span><\/span>ion during the pendency of an SLP<\/span><\/span>. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

However, <\/span><\/span>it was opined that <\/span><\/span>the counseling order passed by the Supreme Court <\/span><\/span>could not <\/span><\/span>be ignored<\/span><\/span>. <\/span><\/span>Relying on<\/span><\/span> Abbai Maligai<\/span><\/span> Partnership F<\/span><\/span>irm v. K. Santhakumaran<\/span><\/span><\/em>, (1998) 7 SCC 386<\/a><\/span><\/span>, the <\/span><\/span>C<\/span><\/span>ourt <\/span><\/span>refrained from passing<\/span><\/span> any order contrary to the d<\/span><\/span>irections of the Supreme Court and directed <\/span><\/span>the applicants to seek clarification from the Supreme Court. <\/span><\/span>[Rimnaaz v. State of Punjab,\u00a0 2019 SCC OnLine P&H 1704<\/b><\/a><\/span><\/span>, <\/span><\/span>decided on 06-09-2019<\/span><\/span>]<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ. dismissed the review application filed by a <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38121,38120,38122],"class_list":["post-221627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-pendency-of-slp","tag-review-jurisdiction","tag-sports-gradation-policy"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order) | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ. dismissed the review application filed by a\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order) | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order) | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench of Daya Chaudhary and Sudhir Mittal, JJ. dismissed the review application filed by a","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/","name":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order) | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-31T11:00:34+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-04T09:21:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/31\/ph-hc-high-court-can-exercise-review-jurisdiction-during-the-pendency-of-slp-and-also-after-its-dismissal-by-a-speaking-or-non-speaking-order\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&H HC | High Court can exercise review jurisdiction during the pendency of SLP and also after its dismissal (by a speaking or non-speaking order)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255138,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/04\/dismissal-of-slp-by-reasoned-order-would-not-attract-doctrine-of-merger-but-will-be-binding-on-all-courts-tribunals-in-india\/","url_meta":{"origin":221627,"position":0},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by reasoned order would not attract doctrine of merger but will be binding on all courts\/tribunals in India","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the doctrine of merger in case of dismissal of Special Leave Petitions (SLPs), the bench of L. Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai*, JJ has held that doctrine of merger would not attract and that it doesn\u2019t matter if the SLP has been dismissed by a non-speaking order\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365246,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/30\/doctrine-of-merger-not-attracted-by-dismissed-slp-jk-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":221627,"position":1},"title":"Dismissal of SLP by Supreme Court with or without reasons, will not attract the Doctrine of Merger: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Editor","date":"October 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile exercising the review jurisdiction, it must be borne in mind that review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and must strictly be confined to the scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Doctrine of Merger","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/jk-86.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":110591,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/14\/dismissal-and-withdrawal-of-slp-cant-be-treated-at-par-for-the-purpose-of-filing-review-petition-in-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":221627,"position":2},"title":"Dismissal and withdrawal of SLP can\u2019t be treated at par for the purpose of filing review petition in HC","author":"Saba","date":"March 14, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0An order passed by the Delhi High Court disposed off the preliminary objection to the maintainability of the review petition, on the ground that the Special Leave Petition (SLP) preferred against the order of which review is sought had been dismissed. A review was sought of the judgment\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250251,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/24\/punjab-gangster-jai-pal-singh-bhullar-gets-killed-in-alleged-police-encounter-in-kolkata-sc-directs-ph-hc-to-re-consider-plea-for-second-post-mortem\/","url_meta":{"origin":221627,"position":3},"title":"Punjab gangster Jai Pal Singh Bhullar gets killed in alleged police encounter in Kolkata; SC directs P&H HC to re-consider plea for second post-mortem","author":"Editor","date":"June 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The Division (Vacation) Bench of Indira Banerjee and M.R. Shah, JJ., directed the High Court of Punjab and Haryana to re-consider its dismissal order with regard to request for second post-mortem in the case of alleged police encounter of infamous gangster Jai Pal Singh Bhullar. The Bench remarked,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":236778,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/10\/05\/is-slp-challenging-dismissal-of-review-petition-by-hc-maintainable-when-main-judgment-is-not-under-challenge-sc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":221627,"position":4},"title":"Is SLP against an order rejecting the review petition maintainable when main judgment is not under challenge? SC answers","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah has reiterated that when the main judgment of the High Court has not been challenged, no relief can be granted by this Court in the special leave petition filed against order rejecting review application to review the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297998,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/29\/whether-slp-under-art-136-against-ncdrc-order-be-entertained-sc-answers-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":221627,"position":5},"title":"Consumer Dispute| Supreme Court explains the scope of maintainability of SLP under Art 136 against NCDRC orders","author":"Editor","date":"July 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court explained that the power to special leave is an exceptional and overriding power, naturally it must be exercised sparingly and with caution and only in very exceptional situations. It will only be used to advance the cause of justice and its exercise will be governed by well-established principles.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"slp under article 136 against ncdrc order","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/slp-under-article-136-against-ncdrc-order.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221627"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221627\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}