{"id":221576,"date":"2019-10-30T13:29:46","date_gmt":"2019-10-30T07:59:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221576"},"modified":"2020-08-31T14:21:00","modified_gmt":"2020-08-31T08:51:00","slug":"all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/","title":{"rendered":"All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Allahabad High Court<\/b>: The Division Bench of Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan JJ. while dismissing the petition found no illegality or irregularity in the impugned order passed by U.P. State Public Service Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the instant case, a show-cause notice was issued to Respondent 1 under Rule 10 (2) of U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 which provides for an award of minor punishment. The Respondent 1 had to reply in respect of irregularities mentioned in the said show-cause notice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The irregularity was such that as per Rule 10 (2) of U.P. Cable Television Network (Exhibition), Rules 1997, monthly details are required to be presented\/furnished in Form-5, however, only three months (November, December 2014 and January 2015) of details were available in the concerned file Form-5 and no details of the earlier months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In his reply, he stated that at the time of the inspection of the relevant file, all Forms-5 pertaining to the cable operator was available in separate Dak files, however, on account<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">of urgency at the time of inspection only available Forms-5 were inserted in the file, but the cable operator has been making payment of entertainment tax every month in time.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of this, the Commissioner, Entertainment Tax, U.P. passed an order and found that Respondent 1 had not kept Forms-5 of every month relating to the cable operator concerned though he was required to keep the same and accordingly awarded the respondent 1 punishment of censure. This punishment was challenged by the Respondent no.1 under the provision of Rules, 1999, which too was dismissed by the State Government. Respondent 1 preferred claim petition before U.P. State Public Service Tribunal, Lucknow which has been allowed vide impugned judgment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Tribunal found that the relevant document, namely, Forms-5 were not kept in the file concerned, however, they were kept elsewhere, hence the same, at the most, may amount to negligence and it will not amount to any misconduct for the reason that by keeping Forms-5 Respondent 1 was not going to be benefited in any manner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For defining the term \u2018Misconduct\u2019, State Government has made Rules under the proviso appended to Article 309 of the Constitution of India which are known as U.P. Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The said Rule mandates that every government servant shall at all times maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty. It further provides that every government servant shall at all times conduct himself in accordance with specific or implied orders of government regulating their behaviour and conduct which may be in force. If anyone behaves in a manner against the said mandate is said to have done \u2018misconduct\u2019.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">To add to this, Counsel for the petitioner, CSC submitted that in absence of any <em>mens rea<\/em> the charge against Respondent 1, as alleged, would not amount to misconduct, is erroneous in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of <i>Union of India v. J. Ahmad<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/7D6OhYWS\">(1979) 2 SCC 286<\/a>. For an act or omission to qualify &#8216;misconduct\u2019 it should be such where irreparable damage or damage with the highest degree of culpability has occurred.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court after analyzing the submissions of the parties and the cases referred to observed that Respondent 1 was alleged to have not kept certain documents in the file concerned. It is not the charge against Respondent 1 that he did not maintain the said documents being its custodian. It is also not the charge against Respondent 1 that documents (Forms-5) pertaining to cable operators were not kept at all. Accordingly, Court stated that at the most respondent 1 can be said to have conducted himself negligently but there being no serious consequence of keeping Forms-5 at a separate place, such act of respondent 1 cannot be construed as misconduct.<\/p>\n<p>In view of the above, the writ petition was dismissed.[State of U.P. v. Rajesh Kumar Singh,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/rQ9pl0z4\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine All 3748<\/b><\/a>, decided on 15-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan JJ. while dismissing the petition found no <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38088,40850,38087,5051],"class_list":["post-221576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-article-309-of-constitution-of-india","tag-irreparable-damage","tag-lack-of-efficiency","tag-misconduct"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan JJ. while dismissing the petition found no\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-30T07:59:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-08-31T08:51:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/\",\"name\":\"All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-30T07:59:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-08-31T08:51:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct","og_description":"Allahabad High Court: The Division Bench of Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan JJ. while dismissing the petition found no","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-30T07:59:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-08-31T08:51:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/Allahabad-High-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/","name":"All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-30T07:59:46+00:00","dateModified":"2020-08-31T08:51:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/30\/all-hc-lack-of-efficiency-or-failure-to-attain-highest-standards-in-discharge-of-duties-attached-to-public-office-would-not-constitute-misconduct\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"All HC | Lack of efficiency or failure to attain highest standards in discharge of duties attached to public office would not constitute misconduct"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":379895,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/01\/jhar-hc-reduction-of-pension-unless-service-record-thoroughly-unsatisfactory\/","url_meta":{"origin":221576,"position":0},"title":"Jharkhand HC: Pension can&#8217;t be reduced unless service record found thoroughly unsatisfactory or grave misconduct proved","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"April 1, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is a settled principle of law that when a statute or law prescribes a specific procedure for an action, that procedure must be followed strictly, rendering other methods invalid.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Reduction of pension","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Reduction-of-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Reduction-of-pension.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Reduction-of-pension.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Reduction-of-pension.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207217,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/25\/court-declines-to-interfere-in-absence-of-material-to-show-mala-fide-exercise-of-power\/","url_meta":{"origin":221576,"position":1},"title":"Court declines to interfere in absence\u00a0 of material to show mala-fide exercise of power","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 25, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench comprising of Pankaj Bhatia, J., against the order of suspension whereby the petitioner has been placed under suspension pending inquiry in terms of the powers conferred under Rule 4 of the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":347730,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/14\/allahabad-hc-stays-dsp-suspension-over-alleged-extramarital-relationship\/","url_meta":{"origin":221576,"position":2},"title":"Allahabad High Court stays UP Government\u2019s suspension order against DSP over alleged relationship outside marriage","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 14, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court directed the standing counsel to file a counter affidavit within four weeks. A rejoinder affidavit, if any, was permitted to be filed within two weeks thereafter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Allahabad-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/24\/supreme-court-special-leave-petition-securities-and-exchange-board-of-india-show-cause-notice-bombay-high-court-sebi-prohibition-of-fraudulent-and-unfair-trade-practices-relating-to-securities\/","url_meta":{"origin":221576,"position":3},"title":"Supreme Court observes documents relied upon for formation of opinion under Rule 3 of the SEBI Adjudication Rules 1995, not required to be disclosed to the noticee unless relied upon in the inquiry","author":"Editor","date":"September 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a special leave petition against the impugned judgment passed by the Bombay High Court, whereby, the Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner to sought directions against Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to forthwith furnish the documents relied upon by them to issue\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Supreme-Court-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":207359,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/12\/28\/show-cause-notice-stayed-as-proper-procedure-before-issuing-same-not-followed\/","url_meta":{"origin":221576,"position":4},"title":"Show cause notice stayed as proper procedure before issuing same not followed","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 28, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: This petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Ajit Kumar, J. where petitioner was alleged of fraud and forgery. Petitioner is an assistant teacher working in a junior primary school. Petitioner submitted that he had obtained B. Ed. degree from Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar University,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":276308,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/29\/allahabad-high-court-up-legislative-council-lal-bihari-yadav-vidhan-parishad-chairman-derecognition-natural-justice-illegal-unconstitutional-quorum-leader-of-opposition-legal-news-leagl\/","url_meta":{"origin":221576,"position":5},"title":"Chairman of the Vidhan Parishad not bound to recognise the leader of opposition party having the greatest numerical strength; Allahabad High Court upholds notification withdrawing recognition of Lal Bihari Yadav as Leader of Opposition in UP Legislative Council","author":"Editor","date":"October 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Allahabad High Court: In a proceeding initiated by member of the UP Legislative Council- Lal Bihari Yadav, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for commanding the respondents to quash and stay the operation of the impugned notification dated 07.07.2022, by which the recognition of the petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/allahabad_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}