{"id":221493,"date":"2019-10-26T08:00:31","date_gmt":"2019-10-26T02:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221493"},"modified":"2019-11-01T16:48:29","modified_gmt":"2019-11-01T11:18:29","slug":"mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/","title":{"rendered":"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam"},"content":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/b> G. S. Ahluwalia, J., allowed a petition and directed the respondents to not take any coercive step against the petitioner unless and until an enquiry is conducted under Section 89 of\u00a0<\/span>M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj, Adhiniyam, 1993.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span>The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has against the order passed under Section 92 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj, Adhiniyam, 1993. The facts of the case are that a show-cause notice was issued to the petitioners under Section 92 of the Adhiniyam for recovery of Rs 2,70,000. The show-cause notice was duly replied by the petitioners, however, without conducting any enquiry, the impugned order was passed.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents have already taken a final decision, which is bad because the provision of Section 92 of Adhiniyam, is merely an execution provision, and unless and until an enquiry is conducted under Section 89 of Adhiniyam, no action can be taken against the petitioners.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the State stated that the impugned order is not a final order, but it is merely a show-cause notice and no action under Section 92 of Adhiniyam would be taken unless and until an enquiry is conducted under Section 89 of Adhiniyam.<\/p>\n

In view of the above, the court relying upon the decision in Kadam Singh v. CEO<\/i>, 2019(1) MPLJ 420, directed that the respondents shall not affect any recovery or shall not take any coercive step against the petitioners, unless and until an enquiry is conducted under Section 89 of Adhiniyam. Further, the Court has also directed the respondents to initiate an enquiry under Section 89 of Adhiniyam and decide the same within a period of six months in accordance with the law. [Kamla Yadav v. State of M.P.<\/b>, 2019 SCC OnLine MP 3090<\/b><\/a>, decided on 22-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Madhya Pradesh High Court: G. S. Ahluwalia, J., allowed a petition and directed the respondents to not take any coercive step against <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30150,38053,18281],"class_list":["post-221493","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-enquiry","tag-section-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-1993","tag-show-cause-notice"],"yoast_head":"\nMP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G. S. Ahluwalia, J., allowed a petition and directed the respondents to not take any coercive step against\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-26T02:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-01T11:18:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/\",\"name\":\"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-26T02:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-01T11:18:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam","og_description":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: G. S. Ahluwalia, J., allowed a petition and directed the respondents to not take any coercive step against","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-26T02:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-01T11:18:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/MP-high-court1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/","name":"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-26T02:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-01T11:18:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/26\/mp-hc-no-final-order-can-be-passed-without-conducting-enquiry-under-s-89-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-awam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MP HC | No final order can be passed without conducting enquiry under S. 89 of M.P. Panchayat Raj Awam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":205499,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/19\/state-government-has-power-under-section-91-of-the-panchayat-raj-and-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-1993-to-interfere-with-an-order-passed-by-an-authority-under-the-adhiniyam\/","url_meta":{"origin":221493,"position":0},"title":"State Government has power under Section 91 of the Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993 to interfere with an order passed by an authority under the Adhiniyam","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 19, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: A review petition was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Sujoy Paul, J., to review an order passed by this court. Respondent had availed all the remedies available to him under M.P. Panchayat Service (D&A) Rules, 1999 where these rules were created under Section 70\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/MP-HC-JABALPUR.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":208390,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/18\/mp-hc-order-in-excess-of-powers-under-section-391a-of-m-p-panchayat-raj-avam-gram-swaraj-adhiniyam-is-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":221493,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | Order in excess of powers under Section 39(1)(a) of M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam is illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 18, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: This case was filed before a Bench of Rohit Arya, J., where petitioner who was a sarpanch was suspended. Petitioner contended that he was suspended by the impugned order on the ground that a case had been registered for the commission of offence under Sections 7,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":208711,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/24\/kar-hc-karnataka-gram-swaraj-and-panchayat-raj-act-1993-no-confidence-motion-moved-against-adhyaksha-within-first-30-months-of-election-is-invalid\/","url_meta":{"origin":221493,"position":2},"title":"Kar HC | Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: No-confidence motion moved against Adhyaksha within first 30 months of election is invalid","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: The Bench comprising of S. Sunil Dutt Yadav, J. hearing a petition challenging motion of no-confidence moved against President of Hallare Gram Panchayat, held the same to be invalid for not being in accordance with law. Petitioner, the President of Hallare Gram Panchayat, was issued a notice\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":259635,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/07\/mp-hc-state-saddled-with-costs-for-colourable-exercise-of-power-reflecting-favours-petition-allowed\/","url_meta":{"origin":221493,"position":3},"title":"MP HC | State saddled with costs for colourable exercise of power reflecting favours; petition allowed","author":"Editor","date":"January 7, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Division Bench of Sheel Nagu and Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, JJ. allowed petition filed under Art 226 of the Constitution filed by Smt Rampyari Patel and quashed impugned order dated 06-07-2021 passed by State Government. Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat was suspended u\/s 39 of M.P. Panchayat\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":349348,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/02\/chief-executive-officer-zila-panchayat-can-withdraw-financial-powers-of-sarpanch-facing-corruption-charges-mp-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":221493,"position":4},"title":"Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, can withdraw Financial Powers of Sarpanch facing corruption charges: MP High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"June 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is the duty of Chief Executive Officer to ensure that no loss of money or property of Panchayat is caused\u2026\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":49981,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/06\/01\/stay-on-constitution-of-gram-panchayats-in-80-villages-within-industrial-township-of-yamuna-expressway-industrial-developmental-authority\/","url_meta":{"origin":221493,"position":5},"title":"Stay on constitution of Gram Panchayats in 80 villages within ‘industrial township’ of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Developmental Authority","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 1, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Deciding a petition challenging the validity of the elections held to the Gram Panchayats in 80 villages included within the territorial limits of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Developmental Authority which was declared to be an 'industrial township' by the Governor of\u00a0 State of Uttar Pradesh vide notification dated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221493","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221493"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221493\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221493"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221493"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221493"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}