{"id":221406,"date":"2019-10-23T10:30:31","date_gmt":"2019-10-23T05:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=221406"},"modified":"2019-10-23T10:05:59","modified_gmt":"2019-10-23T04:35:59","slug":"ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/","title":{"rendered":"P&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court<\/b>: H.S. Madaan, J. dismissed the application for the transfer of a divorce petition merely on the ground of inconvenience of the attorney in attending hearings.<\/p>\n

The applicant herein was the wife of respondent who had filed a divorce petition against her in the Court of District Judge, Sangrur. Applicant filed the instant transfer application seeking transfer of the divorce case from Sangrur to a Court of competent jurisdiction in Patiala on the ground that she lives in Australia and her appointed attorney was facing difficulty in attending the hearings in Sangrur on dates of listing of a divorce case. Her second ground for seeking transfer was that since the respondent’s father was a senior advocate in the Sangrur District Court and had strong political links, there was a threat to the applicant and her family.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the contentions of the applicant were not sufficient to transfer the divorce petition. It remarked that \u201cThe Court is not to see the convenience of the attorney. If the attorney has got difficulty in attending the dates of hearing, the applicant can very well appoint some other person as her attorney, who can put in an appearance in the Court conveniently.\u201d<\/i> It was also opined that \u201cMerely because respondent\u2019s father is a senior advocate at Sangrur does not mean that he is capable of interfering in judicial proceedings or would do so.\u201d If there is an apprehension of physical harm to the applicant then she should approach the legal enforcement agency.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

In view of the above, the instant application was dismissed. [Rubalpreet Kaur v. Harbarkamaljot Singh, TA-526 of 2019 (O&M), decided on 16-07-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Punjab and Haryana High Court: H.S. Madaan, J. dismissed the application for the transfer of a divorce petition merely on the ground <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[38020,30163,32426],"class_list":["post-221406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-convenience-of-attorney","tag-divorce-petition","tag-transfer-application"],"yoast_head":"\nP&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0 | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Punjab and Haryana High Court: H.S. Madaan, J. dismissed the application for the transfer of a divorce petition merely on the ground\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-23T05:00:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/\",\"name\":\"P&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0 | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-23T05:00:31+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0 | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0","og_description":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: H.S. Madaan, J. dismissed the application for the transfer of a divorce petition merely on the ground","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-23T05:00:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/panjab_and_hariyana_high_court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/","name":"P&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0 | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-23T05:00:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/23\/ph-hc-a-transfer-application-cannot-be-allowed-merely-on-the-ground-of-inconvenience-of-attorney-in-attending-hearings\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P&H HC | A transfer application cannot be allowed merely on the ground of inconvenience of attorney in attending hearings\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":218371,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/19\/ph-hc-wifes-convenience-must-be-seen-before-deciding-transfer-application-in-matrimonial-cases\/","url_meta":{"origin":221406,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | Wife\u2019s convenience must be seen before deciding transfer application in matrimonial cases","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: H.S. Madaan, J. allowed the transfer application for the convenience of the wife in the divorce petition. An application for the transfer of divorce petition was made by the applicant on the ground of financial constraint. The brief facts of the case were that applicant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213746,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/19\/mp-hc-to-waive-off-the-mandatory-6-months-period-for-reconsidering-the-decision-of-divorce-personal-inconvenience-as-a-ground-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":221406,"position":1},"title":"MP HC | To waive off “mandatory 6 months period” for reconsidering the decision of divorce, personal inconvenience as a ground — denied","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 19, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: The Bench of G.S. Ahluwalia, J., dismissed a revision filed in respect of waiving off of the mandatory 6 months period under Section 151 CPC. The present application was filed following the stated facts, in which it has been stated that applicant and respondent filed an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":238734,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/07\/thinking-of-seeking-transfer-of-petition-for-restitution-of-conjugal-rights-under-section-21-a2b-of-the-hindu-marriage-act-1955-sc-says-you-cant\/","url_meta":{"origin":221406,"position":2},"title":"Thinking of seeking transfer of petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 21-A(2)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955? SC says you can’t","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"November 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where the husband and wife both sought transfer of cases filed against by both of them against one another, the single judge bench of V. Ramasubramanian, J allowed the transfer petition filed by the wife and transferred the divorce case instituted by the husband in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270439,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/21\/calcutta-high-court-transfers-matrimonial-suit-showing-leniency-towards-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":221406,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court transfers Matrimonial suit showing leniency towards wife","author":"Editor","date":"July 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J. took cognizance of a petition which was preferred by the petitioner -wife praying for transfer of Matrimonial Suit pending before the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Coochbehar to any other Court of Additional District Judge at Siliguri, allowing the transfer. Petitioner's marriage\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":243054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/01\/30\/restitution-of-conjugal-rights-read-how-supreme-court-imparted-justice-to-a-woman-despite-rejecting-her-transfer-petition\/","url_meta":{"origin":221406,"position":4},"title":"Restitution of conjugal rights| Read how Supreme Court imparted justice to a woman despite rejecting her Transfer Petition","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile the hardship, both social and financial, pleaded by the petitioner deserves favourable consideration, the transfer of the case at this stage of the proceeding may not be appropriate.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/sc-07-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":324228,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/06\/12\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-allows-transfer-of-divorce-petition-based-upon-wifes-inconvenience-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":221406,"position":5},"title":"Explained| Andhra Pradesh HC allows transfer of divorce petition on account of wife’s inconvenience in a matrimonial proceeding","author":"Editor","date":"June 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife has to be considered than inconvenience of the husband. There are grounds to consider the request of the petitioner to transfer the petition.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221406","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=221406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/221406\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=221406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=221406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=221406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}