{"id":220578,"date":"2019-10-07T18:00:49","date_gmt":"2019-10-07T12:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=220578"},"modified":"2019-11-01T16:55:22","modified_gmt":"2019-11-01T11:25:22","slug":"sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/","title":{"rendered":"SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)<\/b>: G. Mahalingam, (Whole Time Member) disposed of the application allowing exemption from the Takeover Regulations, 2011 when the proposed acquisition was not prejudicial to the public shareholding.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An application seeking exemption from the applicability of, Regulations 3, 4 and 5 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 (\u201cTakeover Regulations\u201d) in the matter of proposed acquisition of shares and voting rights in the Target Company, was received by SEBI from Amit Anand on behalf of Anand Drishti Trust (\u201cAcquirer Trust\/Proposed Acquirer\u201d) for acquiring APIS India Limited (\u201cTarget Company\u201d).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The proposed acquisition involved a transfer of 71.04% equity shares from Prem Anand, Vimal Anand, Amit Anand, Manisha Anand and Sakshi Anand to Anand Drishti Trust. This transaction would result in a direct acquisition of shares by the Acquirer Trust in the Target Company attracting Regulation 3 of the Takeover Regulations 2011 The Acquirer Trust would also acquire shares in the Promoter Companies resulting in an indirect acquisition of shares\/control in the Target Company which would also result in an indirect acquisition of shares\/control in the Target Company i.e. acquisition by Anand Drishti Trust of 1.07% equity shares held by APIS Naturals Product Private Limited and 2.61% equity shares held by Modern Herbals Private Limited, attracting Regulation 5 of the Takeover Regulations 2011.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">An exemption was sought on the grounds that the proposed acquisition would take place pursuant to a private family arrangement, which was intended at consolidation of shareholding of existing Individual Promoters in APIS in a family trust to facilitate succession planning and welfare of the Anand Family. It is a non\u2013commercial transaction, which will not prejudice the interests of the public shareholders of the Target Company in any manner.<i><span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">On a careful perusal of the materials on record, it was found that the Trust was in substance, only a mirror image of the Promoters\u2019 holdings and consequently, there was no change of ownership or control of the shares or voting rights in the Target Company. The Acquirer Trust also submitted the Deed of Amendment executed on October 01, 2019, incorporating changes to the Trust Deed to ensure its compliance with the requirements specified in SEBI Circular dated December 22, 2017, The pre-acquisition and post-acquisition shareholding of the Promoters in the Target Company was to remain the same (except that of the transferors and the transferees in the Direct Acquisition). There was no change in the public shareholding of the Target Company.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">SEBI was of the view that the Target Company would continue to be in compliance with the minimum public shareholding requirements under the Securities Contracts Regulation Rules, 1957 (\u201cSCRR\u201d) and the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Accordingly, the Applicant Trust was found eligible for exemption as sought and the same was granted in exercise of the powers conferred upon the member under Section 19 read with Section 11(1) and Section 11(2)(h) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (\u201cSEBI Act\u201d) and Regulation 11(5) of the Takeover Regulations subject to certain conditions imposed in the interest of investors, wherein on completion of the proposed acquisition, the Proposed Acquirer was asked to file a report with SEBI within a period of 21 days from the date of such acquisition, as provided in the Takeover Regulations. The Proposed Acquirer was also ordered to ensure at all points in time, that Directors appointed in the Promoter Companies, viz. ANPPL and MHPL were either the individual Promoters or their immediate relatives or lineal descendants.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Such exemption for the acquisition was not be construed as exemption from the disclosure requirements under Chapter V of the aforesaid Regulations; compliance with the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015; Listing Agreement\/SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 or any other applicable Acts, Rules and Regulations.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span>[APIS (India) Ltd. v. Anand Drishti Trust, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/\/DocumentLink\/EFcH9sDH\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine SEBI 156<\/b><\/a> , decided on 04-10-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): G. Mahalingam, (Whole Time Member) disposed of the application allowing exemption from the Takeover Regulations, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): G. Mahalingam, (Whole Time Member) disposed of the application allowing exemption from the Takeover Regulations,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-07T12:30:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-01T11:25:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/SEBI1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/\",\"name\":\"SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-07T12:30:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-01T11:25:22+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders","og_description":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): G. Mahalingam, (Whole Time Member) disposed of the application allowing exemption from the Takeover Regulations,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-07T12:30:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-01T11:25:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/SEBI1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/","name":"SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-07T12:30:49+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-01T11:25:22+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/07\/sebi-acquisition-violating-takeover-regulations-allowed-where-objective-of-the-proposed-acquisitions-was-to-streamline-succession-and-promote-welfare-of-promoter-family-no-prejudice-to-interest-of\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SEBI | Acquisition violating Takeover Regulations allowed where objective of proposed acquisitions was to streamline succession and promote welfare of Promoter family, no prejudice to interest of public shareholders"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":252283,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/05\/takeover-regulations\/","url_meta":{"origin":220578,"position":0},"title":"SEBI |\u00a0Jammu &#038; Kashmir government exempted from Takeover regulations for the proposed acquisition of equity shares of Jammu and Kashmir Bank","author":"Editor","date":"August 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): S.K. Mohanty, Whole Time Member, exempted the Government of Jammu and Kashmir, from complying with the requirements of Regulation 3(2) of the Takeover Regulations with respect to the Proposed Acquisition of 6.06% equity shares in the Target Company viz., Jammu and Kashmir Bank\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":211682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/09\/sebi-exemption-from-public-announcement-of-open-offer-for-acquiring-shares-where-no-change-in-control-of-target-company-post-takeover\/","url_meta":{"origin":220578,"position":1},"title":"SEBI | Exemption from public announcement of open offer for acquiring shares, where no change in control of Target Company post-takeover","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 9, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India: The Board comprising G. Mahalingam as Whole Time Member, allowed a consortium of port trusts exemption from making a public announcement of open offer for acquiring shares of a mini-ratna public sector undertaking (PSU), opining that the takeover would cause no change in ultimate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":257596,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/23\/sebi-exception-granted-for-gifting-shares-in-an-acquisition-proposed-acquirer-to-file-report-within-21-days-post-acquisition\/","url_meta":{"origin":220578,"position":2},"title":"SEBI | Exception granted for gifting shares in an acquisition| Proposed acquirer to file report within 21 days post-acquisition","author":"Editor","date":"November 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): S.K. Mohanty, Whole Time Member, while deciding an order, granted exemption to the Anived Family Trust (Proposed Acquirer) from complying with the requirements of Regulation 3(2) of the Takeover Regulations, 2011 with respect to the proposed direct acquisition in the, Renaissance Global Limited\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":250229,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/23\/united-breweries-acquisition\/","url_meta":{"origin":220578,"position":3},"title":"SEBI | Kingfisher\u2019s chopped wings and shrinked wingspan | United Breweries Acquisition | Heineken exempted from the obligation under Takeover Regulations with exceptions","author":"Editor","date":"June 23, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): S.K. Mohanty, Whole Time Member, exempted Heineken International B.V from the obligation to make an open offer under Regulation 3(2) read with Regulation 3(3) of the Takeover Regulations, 2011 with respect to the proposed acquisitions of transfer shares of United Breweries Limited. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":244438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/26\/sebi\/","url_meta":{"origin":220578,"position":4},"title":"SEBI grants an exemption to &#8216;Pantone&#8217; from takeover norms with respect to acquisition of shares in Tata Communications Ltd.","author":"Editor","date":"February 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Security and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): S.K. Mohanty, (Whole Time Member) had granted exemptions to Pantone Finvest Ltd., from complying with the requirements of regulation 3(2) read with regulation 10(1)(a)(ii) of the Takeover Regulations 2011 with respect to direct acquisitions in Tata Communications Ltd. Pantone Finvest Ltd. had proposed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":213040,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/01\/sebi-public-announcement-of-open-offer-exempted-where-share-acquisition-is-a-non-commercial-transaction-and-part-of-a-private-family-arrangement\/","url_meta":{"origin":220578,"position":5},"title":"SEBI | Public announcement of open offer exempted where share acquisition is a non-commercial transaction and part of a private family arrangement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): The Board comprising G. Mahalingam as Whole Time Member, granted an exemption to a family trust from public announcement of an open offer for acquiring shares of one of its companies. Supriyajith Family Trust (Acquirer) filed an application under Regulation 11(1) the Securities\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220578"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220578\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}