{"id":220526,"date":"2019-10-05T13:30:01","date_gmt":"2019-10-05T08:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=220526"},"modified":"2019-10-10T17:49:04","modified_gmt":"2019-10-10T12:19:04","slug":"pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/","title":{"rendered":"Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Patna High Court:\u00a0<\/strong>Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the application by giving him an opportunity to approach the Board of Directors in order to get his punishment reviewed.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner was a Branch Manager of the respondent Bank which alleged that he did not observe the norms regarding maintenance, safety, upkeep and security of documents including banker\u2019s cheque book in the Branch.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner being on leave from 15.12.2001 to 27.12.2001, had handed over charge of the branch to another officer. He returned on 27.12.2001and on 29.12.2001 it was revealed that the banker\u2019s cheque for an amount of Rs. 2.5 lakh was encashed at the State Bank of India. The cheque was drawn from the petitioner&#8217;s branch since he had not observed the rules for safe maintenance and upkeep of valuable documents including banker\u2019s cheque, such withdrawal had been made.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The petitioner\u2019s case was that the transaction has been done during the petitioner&#8217;s period of leave and he had handed over the keys of almirah in the branch wherein all the documents including the banker\u2019s cheque book was kept to the Incharge.<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mr. Prashant Vedasen, appearing on behalf of the Bank, submitted that substantially the charge was for non-observance of adequate precaution in the matter of maintenance of safety and upkeep of the valuable documents in the bank. From a bare perusal of the statement of imputation, enclosed along with the charge memo, it would be evident that the petitioner did not ensure that there was a system of duel charge\/custody of the valuable documents including banker\u2019s cheque book in his branch. There was no system of accounting at the end of every day as to how many leaf from the banker\u2019s cheque was used or remained unused. Even after his joining on 27.12.2001, the petitioner did not verify whether the banker\u2019s cheque, which was encashed on 18.12.2001, was issued from the cheque book or not. The fraudulent withdrawal came to light on 29.12.2001. Even passbooks were not being updated on a daily basis and the banking transactions were being entered in a pseudo passbook. These allegations\/ imputations were not denied by the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court held that handing over his responsibilities to the branch in-charge in his absence would not absolve the petitioner of the observance of norms and requisite caution by at least updating of the banker&#8217;s cheque book account every day. Whether the petitioner could be attributed to the issuance of the cheque was an issue that had not been conclusively established by the authorities as the Forensic Science Laboratory had submitted a report that the petitioner&#8217;s signature on the cheque book was forged. Therefore, at best the petitioner&#8217;s lack of adequate care in the matter of maintenance and safety of the documents was an issue in the instant proceeding.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In view of the above-noted facts, the writ application was disposed of with the directions that the petitioner was permitted one opportunity to raise the issue of quantum of punishment before the Appellate Authority i.e. Board of Directors of Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank. Since the petitioner had not raised this issue, liberty was granted, but with a stipulation that if the authorities were of the view that more lenient view could have been taken in the matter, the effect of the same would be prospective and will not give rise to claim for any arrears by the petitioner, since he had not raised this issue earlier. [Vinay Kumar v. Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, <a href=\"http:\/\/scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/sBTIK1Ll\"><b>2019 SCC OnLine Pat 1708<\/b><\/a>, decided on 20-09-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court:\u00a0Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the application by giving him an opportunity to approach the Board of Directors in order <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37831,3301],"class_list":["post-220526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-branch-incharge","tag-liability"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna High Court:\u00a0Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the application by giving him an opportunity to approach the Board of Directors in order\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-05T08:00:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-10T12:19:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/\",\"name\":\"Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-05T08:00:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-10T12:19:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability","og_description":"Patna High Court:\u00a0Madhuresh Prasad, J. disposed of the application by giving him an opportunity to approach the Board of Directors in order","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-05T08:00:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-10T12:19:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/patna-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/","name":"Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-05T08:00:01+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-10T12:19:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/pat-hc-handing-over-responsibility-to-branch-incharge-during-his-own-absence-would-not-absolve-branch-manager-of-his-liability\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pat HC | Handing over responsibility to branch incharge during his own absence would not absolve Branch Manager of his liability"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":239033,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/11\/madras-hc-are-advocates-barred-from-doing-money-lending-business-with-their-clients-read-hcs-opinion-in-light-of-sc-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":220526,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC | Are Advocates barred from doing money lending business with their clients? Read HC&#8217;s opinion in light of SC decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 11, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0G.K. Ilathiraiyan, J., addressed a petition wherein it was reiterated that Advocates are barred from having any business transaction or loan transaction with his client as the same amounts to professional misconduct. Purpose of filing the present petition was to quash the proceedings taken place by the Judicial\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6445,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/01\/28\/only-drawee-bank-to-be-considered-in-cheque-bounce-offences\/","url_meta":{"origin":220526,"position":1},"title":"Only drawee bank to be considered in cheque bounce offences","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 28, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Dismissing a plea in a\u00a0 cheque bounce case, a bench comprising of S.B. Shukre, J held that only drawee bank's jurisdiction could be considered during criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments\u00a0 Act, 1881, even though the Real Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) system facility enabled the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":245718,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/18\/cheque-truncation-system\/","url_meta":{"origin":220526,"position":2},"title":"RBI |Cheque Truncation System for faster clearing of cheques to extend in all bank branches by September 30, 2021","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Extension of Cheque Truncation System (CTS) across all bank branches in the country. What is Cheque Truncation System (CTS)? Cheque Truncation System of Image-based Clearing System is for faster clearing of cheques. Cheque Truncation speeds up the process of collection of cheques resulting in better service to customers, reduces the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hot Off The Press&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":275169,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/06\/companies-having-different-establishments-or-branches-or-different-units-in-any-establishment-or-branch-can-now-nominate-an-officer-who-has-the-authority-vide-legal-metrology-general-amendment-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":220526,"position":3},"title":"Companies having different establishments or branches or different units in any establishment or branch can now nominate an officer who has the authority vide Legal Metrology (General) Amendment Rules, 2022","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 The Central Government has notified Legal Metrology (General) Amendment Rules, 2022 to amend the Legal Metrology (General) Rules, 2011 to provide for the companies to nominate an officer of the establishment or branch or unit in any establishment or branch who has the authority and responsibility for planning,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legislation Updates&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legislation Updates","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/legislationupdates\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Central Government Notification","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-226.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260583,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/cheque-gets-deposited-to-the-account-of-account-holder-with-strikingly-similar-name-bank-blames-customer-read-why-sc-was-surprised-at-ncdrcs-ruling\/","url_meta":{"origin":220526,"position":4},"title":"Cheque gets deposited to the account of account holder with strikingly similar name. Bank blames customer. Read why SC was &#8220;surprised&#8221; at NCDRC&#8217;s ruling\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"January 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In an interesting case where one SBI account holder was left with a balance of Rs. 59\/- only in his account due to the existence of another bank account with strikingly similar name in the same branch, the bench of Sanjiv Khanna and Bela M. Trivedi*, JJ has\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368088,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/28\/s-138-ni-act-sc-on-jurisdiction-to-try-complaints-for-account-payee-cheque\/","url_meta":{"origin":220526,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court clears the air on which Court has the jurisdiction to try complaint under S. 138 NI Act in respect of account payee cheque","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cFor deciding jurisdiction, it is not sufficient to establish whether a person maintains an account in a particular bank. It is necessary to also ascertain the specific branch of the bank in which he maintains the account to completely and unambiguously decide the said question\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"complaints for account payee cheque","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/complaints-for-account-payee-cheque.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/complaints-for-account-payee-cheque.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/complaints-for-account-payee-cheque.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/complaints-for-account-payee-cheque.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220526"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220526\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}