{"id":220437,"date":"2019-10-03T14:00:58","date_gmt":"2019-10-03T08:30:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=220437"},"modified":"2019-10-10T17:35:06","modified_gmt":"2019-10-10T12:05:06","slug":"ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court<\/strong>: A.M. Babu, J. dismissed a regular second appeal filed by a lady on the ground that no substantial question of law was involved therein.<\/p>\n

The appellant herein and the respondent herein were neighbors. The appellant claimed that the respondent constructed his house between the period 2003-2012 and that the construction was without the permission of the panchayat, and it was also violative of the Kerala Building Rules. Parts of the respondent\u2019s property were extended and constructed close to the appellant\u2019s property. Being aggrieved by the respondent\u2019s actions, the appellant herein filed a suit praying for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against him. In a trial before the Court, the respondent (defendant in the suit) contended that he had completed the construction of his property in 2000, and also the building was in compliance with the Kerala Building Rules and permitted by the panchayat. It was constructed with the consent of the previous owner and the appellant started residing on her property only after 2007. Hearing arguments of both the parties, the trial court dismissed the appellant\u2019s suit. Appeal filed by her against the said order was also dismissed. Aggrieved thereby, she filed the present second appeal before this Court.<\/p>\n

The learned judge took account of the facts and evidence presented in trial court such as the report of the local commissioner where it was specified that the defendant had built his portion in the disputed land in 2003, and the plaintiff bought property only in 2005when the building of the defendant was already in existence. She filed the suit only in 2012.<\/p>\n

High Court observed that \u201cdiscretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law.\u201d<\/em> Thus, the appeal was dismissed.[T.G. Ramani v. B. Nandagopan, 2019 SCC OnLine Ker 2542<\/b><\/a>, decided on 09-08-2019]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kerala High Court: A.M. Babu, J. dismissed a regular second appeal filed by a lady on the ground that no substantial question <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37820,36300,25654],"class_list":["post-220437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-discretionary-reliefs","tag-mandatory-injunction","tag-substantial-question-of-law"],"yoast_head":"\nKer HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-\u2502discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court: A.M. Babu, J. dismissed a regular second appeal filed by a lady on the ground that no substantial question\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-\u2502discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-10-03T08:30:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-10-10T12:05:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1330\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/\",\"name\":\"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-10-03T08:30:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-10-10T12:05:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-\u2502discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law","og_description":"Kerala High Court: A.M. Babu, J. dismissed a regular second appeal filed by a lady on the ground that no substantial question","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-\u2502discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2019-10-03T08:30:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-10-10T12:05:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1330,"height":887,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/KeralaHC-e1521442636157.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/","name":"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-10-03T08:30:58+00:00","dateModified":"2019-10-10T12:05:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/03\/ker-hc-%e2%94%82discretionary-reliefs-are-not-meant-for-those-who-are-on-a-snails-pace-in-approaching-a-court-of-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ker HC | Discretionary reliefs are not meant for those who are on a snail\u2019s pace in approaching a court of law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":216154,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/06\/27\/ph-hc-presence-of-a-substantial-question-of-law-not-a-sine-qua-non-for-deciding-a-regular-second-appeal\/","url_meta":{"origin":220437,"position":0},"title":"P&H HC | Presence of a substantial question of law, not a sine qua non for deciding a regular second appeal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: Sudip Ahluwalia, J. disposed of the matter directing the parties that a disputed land cannot be used by either of them and also stated that a regular second appeal can be accepted without a substantial question of law. In the present case, a suit was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":245201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/03\/08\/grant-of-injunction\/","url_meta":{"origin":220437,"position":1},"title":"Megh HC | Grant of injunction cannot be claimed by a party as a matter of right nor can it be denied by the Court arbitrarily; Court dismisses petition on the question of effective possession","author":"Editor","date":"March 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Meghalaya High Court: H. S. Thangkhiew, J., dismissed a petition which was filed aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court by way of this application under Order 6 of Meghalaya (Jurisdiction over District Council Courts) Order, 2014. The appellant claimed that he was running a hostel in a building\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240174,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/05\/cal-hc-no-injunction-can-be-passed-restraining-a-party-from-instituting-any-proceeding-in-a-court-of-law-principles-governing-injunction-order-reiterated\/","url_meta":{"origin":220437,"position":2},"title":"Cal HC | No injunction can be passed restraining a party from instituting any proceeding in a court of law; Principles governing injunction order reiterated","author":"Editor","date":"December 5, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Division Bench of Harish Tandon and Hiranmay Bhattacharyya JJ., while allowing the present appeal, discusses upon the essentials of granting an injunction order in light of the settled precedents. Background The defendant in a suit for infringement of copyright has preferred the instant first miscellaneous appeal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":220523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/10\/05\/hp-hc-%e2%94%82-employees-compensation-act-service-of-show-cause-notice-to-the-employer-before-imposition-of-penalty-is-mandatory\/","url_meta":{"origin":220437,"position":3},"title":"HP HC | Employees Compensation Act: Service of show-cause notice to the employer before imposition of penalty is mandatory","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. partly allowed the appeal of filed by an employer challenging the compensation granted to a deceased employee\u2019s wife under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 on the ground that before passing a penalty order against the employer, a reasonable opportunity must have been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291358,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/05\/chanda-kochhar-news-bombay-hc-refuses-interim-relief-of-retirement-benefits\/","url_meta":{"origin":220437,"position":4},"title":"Interim relief would cause \u2018irreparable harm and prejudice\u2019; Bombay High Court refuses interim relief to Chanda Kochhar, former MD & CEO of ICICI Bank seeking retirement benefits","author":"Arunima","date":"May 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court observed that it is not appropriate for a Court to hold a mini trial at the stage of grant of temporary injunction.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-581.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310260,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/28\/cal-hc-overturns-temporary-injunction-in-pre-emption-case-under-section-236-of-the-mahomedan-law-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":220437,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court overturns temporary injunction in Pre-emption case due to delay in immediate demand under Section 236 of the Mahomedan Law","author":"Ritu","date":"December 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court acknowledged the importance of strict compliance with the requirements of Section 236 of the Mahomedan Law in pre-emption cases.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220437"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220437\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}